Skip to main content

Ethics of Robotic Assisted Dying

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Machine Medical Ethics

Part of the book series: Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering ((ISCA,volume 74))

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to introduce and critically assess the prospect of “robotic assisted dying”, i.e., the use of (semi-) autonomous robots for the purpose of assisting willing terminally ill patients in dying, in the medical context. The central conclusion reached here is this: Assuming that physician-assisted suicide is morally permissible, if we develop robots to serve as human caregivers in medical contexts (‘carebots’), and given that assistance in dying is sometimes an important aspect of geriatric care, it is morally permissible for such robots to be able to facilitate and assist in the dying of those patients, in those contexts, at the eligible patient’s sound request. At least, there is nothing inherent in this prospect that introduces moral problems beyond those attached to the development and use of geriatric carebots or (human) physician-assisted suicide in general. One major benefit of robotic assisted dying is that the robot would always assist those consenting patients that are genuinely eligible, and thus such patients would not be at the mercy of a willing physician clause in order to have some control over the timing and manner of their death (something that routinely usurps the effectiveness of human physician-assisted suicide in practice).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/03/the-robot-will-see-you-now/309216/.

  2. 2.

    19 people committed suicide in Foxconn factories in 2010–2011, and one potential solution that has been offered for this problem is to replace human workers with robots. See http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/02/foxconn-robots-worker-suicides.

  3. 3.

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/physician-assisted-suicide-the-case-for-legalization-1.1314119.

  4. 4.

    http://rtc.nagoya.riken.jp/RI-MAN/index_us.html.

  5. 5.

    http://public.health.oregon.gov/ProviderPartnerResources/EvaluationResearch/DeathwithDignityAct/Pages/index.aspx.

  6. 6.

    I acknowledge this as the empirical and controversial claim that it is. For a less optimistic view, see Sparrow and Sparrow [7].

  7. 7.

    Elsewhere [8], I have argued that autonomous robots should be programmed to be pacifists (rather than ‘warists’). While I will not argue for it here, there is nothing about robotic assisted dying that would be inconsistent with that view, despite the fact that such robots would be contributing to the death of their human patients (at the patient’s sound request).

  8. 8.

    http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1997/mar/27/assisted-suicide-the-philosophers-brief/?page=1

References

  1. Arkin R (2013) Lethal autonomous systems and the plight of the non-combatant. AISB Quart 137:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arkin R (2010) The case for ethical autonomy in unmanned systems. J Mil Eth 9:332–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beauchamp T, Childress J (2013) Principles of biomedical ethics, 6th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dworkin R, Nagel T, Nozick R, Rawls J, Thomson JJ (1997) Assisted suicide: the philosophers’ brief. New York review. Available via http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1997/mar/27/assisted-suicide-the-philosophers-brief/?page=1. Accessed 28 Dec 2013

  5. Johnson AM, Axinn S (2013) The morality of autonomous robots. J Mil Eth 12(2):129–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sparrow R (2007) Killer robots. J App Phil 24(1):62–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sparrow R, Sparrow L (2006) In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Minds Mach 16:141–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tonkens R (2013) Should autonomous robots be pacifists? Eth Info Tech 15(2):109–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tonkens R (2009) A challenge for machine ethics. Minds Mach 19(3):421–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan Tonkens .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tonkens, R. (2015). Ethics of Robotic Assisted Dying. In: van Rysewyk, S., Pontier, M. (eds) Machine Medical Ethics. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, vol 74. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08108-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08108-3_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08107-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08108-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics