Abstract
Different regulations about the permission and approval rate of biotechnology and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) between the USA and Europe have been controversial for decades. While there is a wide scientific coverage of what may be the cause of this divergence, little is known about the role that popular media play in the related political discourse. We analyzed the media coverage of biotechnology topics in both the USA and UK from 2011-2013 by examining two opinion-leading newspapers. We test the hypothesis that the respective media content reflects differences in transatlantic policies towards biotechnology. The two newspapers differed in reporting intensity but were alike in their content about GMOs: with the central actors being scientists and NGOs, arguing mostly in the field of the agricultural sector, the debate seems to be locked in a stalemate of potential risks re-iterated against potential benefits, with none of the two positions clearly dominating the discourse.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bauer, M. W., Durant, J., & Gaskell, G. (Eds.). (1998). Biotechnology in the public sphere: A European sourcebook. London: NMSI Trading Ltd.
Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (Eds.). (2000). Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: A practical handbook for social research. Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (Eds.). (2000). Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: A practical handbook for social research. London: Sage.
Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (Eds.). (2002). Biotechnology-the making of a global controversy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carlarne, C. (2007). Notes from a climate change pressure-cooker: sub-federal attempts at transformation meet national resistance in the USA. Connecticut Law Review, 40, 1351.
European Commission. Directorate-General for Economic. (2007). The joint harmonised EU programme of business and consumer surveys (No. 5-2006). European Communities.
Galinsky, E., Bond, J. T., & Friedman, D. E. (1996). The role of employers in addressing the needs of employed parents. Journal of Social Issues, 52(3), 111–136.
Gaskell, G., & Bauer, M. W. (Eds.). (2001). Biotechnology, 1996–2000: The Years of Controversy. London: NMSI Trading Ltd.
Gaskell, G., Bauer, M. W., Durant, J., & Allum, N. C. (1999). Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the US. Science, 285(5426), 384–387.
Gutteling, J. M., Fjæstad, B., & Olofsson, A. (2002). Media coverage 1973–1996: trends and dynamics.
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
Kepplinger, H. M., Ehmig, S. C., & Ahlheim, C. (1991). Gentechnik im Widerstreit: Zum Verhaltnis von Wissenschaft und Journalismus.
Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. London: Sage.
Marwell, G., & Oliver, P. (1993). The critical mass in collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, J. D. (1983). Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus, 112(2), 29–48.
Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. London: Sage.
Neuman, W. R. (1989). Parallel content analysis: Old paradigms and new proposals. Public communication and behavior, 2, 205–289.
Politi, M. C., Kaphingst, K. A., Kreuter, M., Shacham, E., Lovell, M. C., & McBride, T. (2014). Knowledge of health insurance terminology and details among the uninsured. Medical Care Research and Review, 71(1), 85–98.
Reid, I., & Association, Canadian Medical. (2002). Annual national report card on health care 2002. Ottawa, Ont: Canadian Medical Association.
Salisbury, R. H. (1969). An exchange theory of interest groups. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 13, 1–32.
Sheldon, I. M. (2002). Regulation of biotechnology: Will we ever ‘freely’ trade GMOs? European Review of Agricultural Economics, 29(1), 155–176.
Sliter, M., Boyd, E., Sinclair, R., Cheung, J., & McFadden, A. (2013). Inching Toward Inclusiveness: Diversity Climate, Interpersonal Conflict and Well-Being in Women Nurses. Sex Roles, 1–12.
Tsioumani, E. (2004). Genetically modified organisms in the EU: Public attitudes and regulatory developments. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 13(3), 279–288.
Valtysson, B. (2014). Democracy in disguise: the use of social media in reviewing the Icelandic Constitution. Media, Culture and Society, 36(1), 52–68.
WHO, F. (2000). Ad-hoc intergovernmental Codex task force on animal feeding. 13 p. First Session. Dinamarca, 13–15.
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2p2), 1.
Acknowledgments
It is a great pleasure to express my deepest gratitude to Dr. George Baourakis and the Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania (MAICh) that presented me with a most memorable learning experience and an inside look into the world of science and research. First and foremost, I could not but thank Dr. Kostas Karantininis for his invaluable guidance, advice, support, and encouragement, both in times of excitement and disappointment. My deepest appreciation goes also to Drs. Gaskell and Bauer for all their academic work that has always been an enormous inspiration for me.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Galata, L., Karantininis, K., Hess, S. (2014). Cross-Atlantic Differences in Biotechnology and GMOs: A Media Content Analysis. In: Zopounidis, C., Kalogeras, N., Mattas, K., van Dijk, G., Baourakis, G. (eds) Agricultural Cooperative Management and Policy. Cooperative Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06635-6_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06635-6_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06634-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06635-6
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)