Abstract
The chapter introduces a distinction between a person-related and a circumstance directed type of happiness in order to investigate in which way modern technology can contribute to human happiness. This distinction is elaborated as the difference between ‘achiever’s happiness’ and ‘spectator’s happiness’. Looking at the ethical tradition, it is argued that moral philosophers have certain expectations about what should count as true happiness for human beings, who can act in accordance with moral values. The essay presents three arguments for the superiority of achiever’s happiness from a moral point of view. Looking at modern technology it is argued that we find both in an optimistic and a pessimistic evaluation of modern technology valuable insights into the role that technology can (and can not) play for the human striving for happiness. Finally persuasive technologies are presented as one type of recent technologies that promises to contribute to achiever’s happiness if developed while taking ethical requirements into account.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Therefore there is some wisdom in the old saying: Give me the strength to change those things that I can change, the patience to endure the things that I can not change and the wisdom to distinguish the former from the latter.
- 2.
In psychological literature this difference is sometimes discussed along the lines of hedonic enjoyment and person- or character related eudemonia. I differ from this distinction insofar as I want to focus not on different qualities of happiness, but on the objects (circumstance or the subject) that these are directed to. It is plausible that there is still a close relation between hedonic pleasures and external circumstances and eudaimic pleasures and person related experience. See (Deci and Ryan 2008; Huta and Ryan 2010; Waterman et al. 2008). Dualistic typologies are of course in most cases oversimplifications, but they are justified in that they serve the purpose of this chapter. One does not need to be a Hegelian to come up with a third type—and in fact even more categories—e.g. a type of happiness that lies in the expression of personality in the outside world, as e.g. in the case of expressing you creativity in art.
- 3.
- 4.
In the Christian tradition the emphasis on external fate (or fortuna) is even further diminished in the interpretation of the Priamos passage in St. Thomas (Leonhardt 1998, 143).
- 5.
The idea of three different life forms devoted to the quest of happiness is also discussed by Seligman in his distinction between the pleasant life, the good life (of virtuous engagement) and the meaningful life (in which one tries to serve something larger than oneself, e.g. an institution dedicated to moral or otherwise meaningful goals) (Seligman 2004, 260f.).
- 6.
The relation between Kant and Aristotle with regard to happiness is discussed in detail by (Fischer 1983). See also Kant’s discussion of the notion of the highest good in his Critique of Practical Reason (KpV A 198ff.). Many Kant scholar’s focus on Kant’s sharp rejection of happiness and eudemonism in his Groundwork, but tend to neglect the more balanced passages in his Metaphysics of Ethics and the Critique of Practical Reason.
- 7.
I am aware that it is difficult to get philosophers to agree on a claim, or to find agreement amongst different philosophers from different traditions such as virtue ethics, deontology and utilitarianism on the notion of ‘true happiness’. Indeed in a insightful review an external anonymous referee disagreed with my statement about alleged agreement to prefer achiever’s happiness in different traditions. I cannot settle the issue in this chapter. The question of the similarities and differences between different strands of ethical theories and their likely vote on spectator’s or achiever’s happiness certainly merits a closer investigation that cannot be given in detail in this chapter.
- 8.
This argument motivates also much of Plato’s critique on poetry: it should not depict the Gods to do immoral things and evil people to end up being happy. This might be referred to as the famous Plato-Hollywood-Ending-Defense Argument.
- 9.
In positive psychology this philosophical insight is most famously reproduced in the attempts to systematically compare exercises of fun and of gratitude, as in the gratitude days during his teaching duties, that Seligman reports (Seligman 2004, 72f.).
References
Adorno, T. (1979). Dialectic of enlightenment. (New ed). London: Verso.
Anderson, J. (2010). Review: Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness by Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein. Economics and Philosophy, 26(3), 369–375.
Bacon, F. [1620] (2000). The new organon. repr In: L. Jardine & M. Silverthorne (Eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baker, S., & Martinson, D. (2001). The TARES test: Five principles for ethical persuasion. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 16(2&3), 148–175.
Berdichevsky, D., & Neunschwander, E. (1999). Persuasive technologies—toward an ethics of persuasive technology. Communications of the ACM, 42(5), 51.
Bentham, J. [1789] (2007). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. In: Laurence JL (Ed.) New York: Hafner Publication Co. (reprinted Dover Publication: New York 2007).
Bodley, J. (1975). Victims of progress. Menlo Park Calif: Cummings Publication Co.
Brey, P., Briggle, A., & Spence, E. (2012). The good life in a technological age. New York: Routledge.
Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(8), 917–927.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, Eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 1–11. doi:10.1007/s10902-006-9018-1.
Diener, Ed. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34.
Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2007.09.001.
Eid, M., & Larsen, R. J. (2008). The science of subjective well-being. New York: Guilford Press.
Fischer, N. (1983). Tugend und Glückseligkeit. Zu ihrem Verhältnis bei Aristoteles und Kant. Kant-Studien, 74(1), 1–21. doi:10.1515/kant.1983.74.1.1.
Fogg, B. J. (2003). Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Interactive Technologies. Amsterdam; Boston: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. (1987). Theory of communicative action: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Boston: Beacon Press.
Haferkamp, H. (1992). Social change and modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hausman, D. M., & Welch, B. (2010). Debate: To nudge or not to nudge. Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(1), 123–136. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00351.x.
Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology, and other essays (1st ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
Higgs, E., Light, A., & Strong, D. (2000). Technology and the good life?. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hösle, V. (1994). Philosophie der Ökologischen Krise: Moskauer Vorträge. Beck’sche Reihe, 432. München: Beck.
Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(6), 735–762. doi:10.1007/s10902-009-9171-4.
James, W. (1985). The varieties of religious experience: a study in human nature. The Works of William James, Volume 13, Harvard University Press: Cambridge.
Jonas, H. (1984). The Imperative of responsibility : In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Karppinen, P., & Oinas-Kukkonen, HMill. (2013). Three approaches to ethical considerations in the design of behavior change support systems. In S. Berkovsky & J. Freyne (Eds), Persuasive Technology, 7822:87–98. Berlin, Heidelberg. http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-642-37157-8_12.
Kort, Y. (2007). Persuasive technology: second international conference on persuasive technology, PERSUASIVE 2007, Palo Alto, CA, USA, April 26–27, 2007: Revised Selected Papers. Berlin; New York: Springer.
Kroes, P., & Meijers, A. (Eds.). (2001). The empirical turn in the philosophy of technology (1st ed.). Amsterdam: JAI.
Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. New York: Viking.
Leonhardt, R. (1998). Glück als Vollendung des Menschseins: die beatitudo-Lehre des Thomas von Aquin im Horizont des Eudämonismus-Problems. Berlin; New York: W. de Gruyter.
Marx, K. (1938). Capital. London: Allen & Unwin.
McDermott, J. (1969). Technology: The opiate of the intellectuals. The New York Review of Books 13 (2).
McMahon, D. M. (2006). Happiness: A history. New York: Grove Press.
Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mill, J. S. [1863] (2012). Utilitarianism. In: J. Bentham & A. Ryan. Harmondsworth, New York: Penguin Books, (reprint: Middlesex, England).
Peterson, M., & Spahn, A. (2011). Can technological artefacts be moral agents? Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(3), 411–424.
Pressnell, L. (1960). Studies in the industrial revolution, Presented to T.S. Ashton. London: University of London Athlone Press.
Richardson, F. C. (2012). On psychology and virtue ethics. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 32(1), 24–34. doi:10.1037/a0026058.
Rousseau, J-J. (1750). The social contract and discourses. London: Everyman.
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069.
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719.
Schwartz, B., & Sharpe, K. E. (2006). Practical wisdom: Aristotle meets positive psychology. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(3), 377–395. doi:10.1007/s10902-005-3651-y.
Sebnem, O, Salah, M. (2013). Measuring national well-being—what matters most to personal well-being? Office for National Statistics. May 30. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/wellbeing/measuring-national-well-being/what-matters-most-to-personal-well-being-in-the-uk-/art-what-matters-most-to-personal-well-being-in-the-uk-.html#tab-background-notes.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Learned optimism: How to change your mind and your life. New York: Vintage Books.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Authentic happiness: using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfilment. Florence: Free Press.
Smids, J. (2012). The voluntariness of persuasive technology. Persuasive Technology. Design for Health and Safety, In: M. Bang & E.L. Ragnemalm (Eds), 123–132. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 7284. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-31037-9_11.
Snow, C. P. (1959). The two cultures and the scientific revolution. The Rede Lecture, 1959. Cambridge.
Spahn, A. (2010). Technology. 21st century anthropology: A reference handbook, H. Birx (Ed), 132–144. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Spahn, A. (2011). Moralische maschinen? persuasive technik als herausforderung für rationalistische ethiken. E-Procedings Deutscher Kongress für Philosophie, 11–15. September 2011. München: http://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/12596/.
Spahn, A. (2012). And lead us (not) into persuasion? persuasive technology and the ethics of communication. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(4), 633–650.
Spence, E. H. (2011). Information, knowledge and wisdom: Groundwork for the normative evaluation of digital information and its relation to the good life. Ethics and Information Technology, 13(3), 261–275.
Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven Conn.: Yale University Press.
Thompson, S. C. (2009). The role of personal control in adaptive functioning. In Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology, In: Shane J. L., Charles R.S., (Ed), 271–278. Oxford University Press.
Waterman, A. S., Seth, J. S., & Regina, C. (2008). The implications of two conceptions of happiness (Hedonic Enjoyment and Eudaimonia) for the Understanding of Intrinsic Motivation. Journal of Happiness Studies 9 (1) : 41–79. doi:10.1007/s10902-006-9020-7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Spahn, A. (2015). Can Technology Make Us Happy?. In: Søraker, J., Van der Rijt, JW., de Boer, J., Wong, PH., Brey, P. (eds) Well-Being in Contemporary Society. Happiness Studies Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06459-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06459-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06458-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06459-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)