Skip to main content

Destination Inspiration Using eTourism Tool

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2014
  • 6462 Accesses

Abstract

In rural areas tourism is often seen as an opportunity for economic development. Policymakers are searching for instruments to measure values of regions for tourism development. As landscape can be an important unique selling point in rural areas, understanding land use preferences of tourists is essential to describe the value of rural areas. For the tourism industry it is important to know if there are similarities among the tourists in terms of landscape preferences to invest in or promote certain regions. The goal of this project is to collect data of landscape preferences for policymakers and the tourism industry. Information was gathered using geographical data in a Destination Discovering System within www.myplacetobe.eu website, where visitors can discover their favourite holiday destinations in Europe according to their preferences. About 7,000 personalized maps are made by more than 3,300 unique visitors. Forest is the most preferred landscape type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bidoglio, G. & Braat, L. (2012). PRESS-PEER Research on Ecosystem Services. (JRC) Italy: Joint Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovagnet, F. (2005). ‘ICT in the tourism sector. Statistics in focus: Industry, trade and Services; population and social conditions’. Science and Technology Report 34/2005. European Communities, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breman, B. C., Luttik, J. & Vreke, J. (2009). The attractiveness of the Dutch landscape. An exploration of the relation between spatial factors and incoming tourism. Wageningen, Statutory Research Tasks Unit for Nature & the Environment. WOt-rapport No. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabholkar, P. A. (1996). Consumer evaluations of new technology-based self-service options: An investigation of alternative models of service quality. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13, 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ETC (2006). Tourism trends for Europe. Brussels (European Travel Commission).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurobaromter (1998). Facts and Figures on THE EUROPEANS ON HOLIDAYS. European Commission, Directorate General XXIII.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2012). Statistics in focus 50/2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goossen, M., Meeuwsen, H., Franke, J., & Kuyper, M. (2009). My ideal tourism destination: Personalized destination recommendation system combining individual preferences and GIS data. Journal of Information Technology and Tourism, 11(1), 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häubl, G., & Trifts, V. (2000). Consumer decision making in online shopping environments: The effects of interactive decision aids. Marketing Science, 19(1), 4–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, Y.-H., Gretzel, U., Xiang, Z., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2006). Information search for travel decisions. In D. R. Fesenmaier, H. Werther, & K. W. Wöber (Eds.), Destination recommendation systems: Behavioural foundations and applications (pp. 3–16). Oxfordshire: Cabi International.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ING (2010). ING Economisch Bureau, 7 mei 2010. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, A., Nolet, C., Roodhuyzen, D., & Schuurman, S. (2008). Daar moet ik zijn? Een onderzoek naar de invloed van de website www.daarmoetikzijn.nl op toeristisch-recreatief gedrag en beleid in Nederland. Stageverslag Wageningen Universiteit.

  • Lee, J., Soutar, G., & Daly, T. (2007). Tourists search for different types of information: A cross-national study. Journal of Information Technology and Tourism, 9(3/4), 165–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, M., & Kaim, E. (1999). Weather and holiday destination preferences: Image attitude and experience. The Tourist Review, 2, 54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, T., Ricci, F. & Venturini, A. (2009). Learning adaptive recommendation strategies for online travel planning. In: W. Höpken, U. Gretzel & R. Laws (Eds.), Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism, 2009. Proceedings of the International Conference in Amsterdam (pp 149–160). Vienna: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton-Lefevre, J. & Borges, M. A. (2011). A new big plan for nature: Opportunities for travel and tourism. In The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2011. World Economic Forum, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mieczokowski, Z. (1995). Environmental issues of tourism and recreation. Lanham: Maryland, University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mücher, C. A., Klijn, J. A., Wascher, D. W., & Schaminée, J. H. J. (2010). A new European Landscape Classification (LANMAP): A transparent, flexible and user-oriented methodology to distinguish landscape. Ecological Indicators, 10(2010), 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Multiscope (2010). www.multiscope.nl/organisatie/nieuws/berichten/online-vakantie-boeken-onnodig-tijdrovend.html

  • NBTC (2006). Destinatie Holland: De buitenlandse toerist nader bekeken. Netherlands Board of Tourism and Conventions, Leidschendam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, P. (2002). ‘ESTIA-efficient electronic services for tourists’. In: S. Flanagan, J. Ruddy, & N. Andrews (Eds.), Action: Innovation in tourism planning (pp. 23–38) Tourism Research Centre, Dublin Institute of Technology: Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyscanner (2012). Press Release. July 3, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telegraaf (2010). 17 April 2010. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • TNS Political and Social (2012). Attitudes of Europeans towards Tourism. Flash Eurobarometer 334. EU commission; Directorate-General Enterprise.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quartely, 28(4), 695–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venturini, A., & Ricci, F. (2006). Applying trip@dvice recommendation technology to www.visiteurope.com. In Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 607–611). Riva del Garda, Italy, Aug 28th–Sept 1st.

  • Viner, D., & Agnew, M. (1999). Climate change and its impacts on tourism. Norwich: University of East Anglia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Goossen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Goossen, M., Meeuwsen, H., Franke, J., de Jong Alterra, A. (2013). Destination Inspiration Using eTourism Tool. In: Xiang, Z., Tussyadiah, I. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2014. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03973-2_65

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics