Abstract
This paper focuses on how older people in Sweden imagine the potential role of robots in their lives. The data collection involved mixed methods, including focus groups, a workshop, a questionnaire and interviews. The findings obtained and lessons learnt from one method fed into another. In total, 88 older people were involved. The results indicate that the expectations and preconceptions about robots are multi-dimensional and ambivalent. Ambivalence can been seen in the tension between the benefits of having a robot looking after the older people, helping with or carrying out tasks they no longer are able to do, and the parallel attitudes, resilience and relational inequalities that accompany these benefits. The participants perceived that having a robot might be “good for others but not themselves”, “good as a machine not a friend” while their relatives and informal caregivers perceived a robot as “not for my relative but for other older people”.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Czaja, S.J., Lee, C.C.: The impact of aging on access to technology. Universal Access in the Information Society 5(4), 341–349 (2007)
Koskinen, I., et al.: Design Research Through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom. Morgan Kaufmann (2011)
Latour, B., Woolgar, S.: Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton Univ. Pr. (1979)
Wyatt, S.: Non-users also matter: The construction of users and non-users of the Internet. In: How Users Matter The Co-construction of Users and Technology, pp. 67–79 (2003)
Ihde, D.: Bodies in technology, vol. 5. U. of Minnesota Press (2002)
Salvini, P., Laschi, C., Dario, P.: Design for acceptability: improving robots’ coexistence in human society. International Journal of Social Robotics 2(4), 451–460 (2010)
Forlizzi, J., DiSalvo, C., Gemperle, F.: Assistive robotics and an ecology of elders living independently in their homes. Human–Computer Interaction 19(1-2), 25–59 (2004)
Broadbent, E., Stafford, R., MacDonald, B.: Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: Review and future directions. International Journal of Social Robotics 1(4), 319–330 (2009)
Bemelmans, R., et al.: Socially assistive robots in elderly care: A systematic review into effects and effectiveness. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 13(2), 114–120 (2012), e1
Kidd, C.D., Taggart, W., Turkle, S.: A sociable robot to encourage social interaction among the elderly. In: Proceedings of 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA. IEEE (2006)
Heerink, M., et al.: Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: The Almere model. International Journal of Social Robotics 2(4), 361–375 (2010)
Young, J.E., et al.: Toward acceptable domestic robots: Applying insights from social psychology. International Journal of Social Robotics 1(1), 95–108 (2009)
Beer, J.M., et al.: The domesticated robot: Design guidelines for assisting older adults to age in place. ACM (2012)
Frennert, S., Östlund, B., Eftring, H.: Would Granny Let an Assistive Robot into Her Home? In: Ge, S.S., Khatib, O., Cabibihan, J.-J., Simmons, R., Williams, M.-A. (eds.) ICSR 2012. LNCS, vol. 7621, pp. 128–137. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of innovations. Free Pr. (1995)
Dautenhahn, K., et al.: What is a robot companion-friend, assistant or butler? In: 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2005). IEEE (2005)
Akrich, M.: The description of technical objects. Shaping Technology/Building Society, 205–224 (1992)
Latour, B.: Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press (1999)
Tornstam, L.: Gerotranscendence: The contemplative dimension of aging. Journal of Aging Studies 11(2), 143–154 (1997)
Melenhorst, A.-S.: Making decisions about future activities: The role of age and health. Gerontechnology 1(3), 153–162 (2002)
Bouma, H., et al.: Gerontechnology in perspective. Gerontechnology 6(4), 190–216 (2007)
Eisma, R., et al.: Early user involvement in the development of information technology-related products for older people. Universal Access in the Information Society 3(2), 131–140 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Frennert, S., Eftring, H., Östlund, B. (2013). What Older People Expect of Robots: A Mixed Methods Approach. In: Herrmann, G., Pearson, M.J., Lenz, A., Bremner, P., Spiers, A., Leonards, U. (eds) Social Robotics. ICSR 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8239. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02675-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02675-6_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02674-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02675-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)