Comparison of Deceptive and Truthful Travel Reviews

  • Kyung-Hyan Yoo
  • Ulrike Gretzel
Conference paper

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-211-93971-0_4

Cite this paper as:
Yoo KH., Gretzel U. (2009) Comparison of Deceptive and Truthful Travel Reviews. In: Höpken W., Gretzel U., Law R. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2009. Springer, Vienna

Abstract

As the use of online reviews grows, so does the risk of providers trying to influence review postings through the submission of false reviews. It is difficult for users of online review platforms to detect deception as important cues are missing in online environments. Automatic screening technologies promise a reduction in the risk but need to be informed by research as to how to classify reviews as suspicious. Using findings from deception theory, a study was conducted to compare the language structure of deceptive and truthful hotel reviews. The results show that deceptive and truthful reviews are different in terms of lexical complexity, the use of first person pronouns, the inclusion of brand names, and their sentiment. However, the results suggest that it might be difficult to distinguish between deceptive and truthful reviews based on structural properties.

Keywords

hotel reviews deception false truthful detection 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kyung-Hyan Yoo
    • 1
  • Ulrike Gretzel
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for Intelligent Systems in TourismTexas A&M UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations