Abstract
We present a case study of a project to introduce a new organization-wide, integrated information system within the UK healthcare sector that we conducted as part of a wider, socio-technical exploration of factors influencing the dependability of computer-based systems. We report in detail on the problems of working with and evolving a standardized classification of work procedures that is central to the organizational purpose of the new IT system, and the responses of both users and of the project team to these problems. These have important implications for the usability of computer-based systems and for the dependability of the information they contain. Drawing insights from sociological studies of classification and standardization, we reflect upon the lessons for the development and implementation of computer-based systems designed to serve as “common information spaces.”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bannon L, Bødker S (1997) Constructing common information space. In Pro-ceedings of the European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW’97, Dordrecht. Kluwer, Lancaster, UK, pp. 81–96.
Berg M, Bowker G (1997) The multiple bodies of the medical record: Towards a sociology of an artifact. Sociological Quarterly 38: 511–535.
Berg M, Timmermans S (2000) Order and their others—On the constitution of universalities. Medical Work 8(1): 31–61.
Bowker GC, Star SL (1999) Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Brady T, Tierney M, Williams R (1992) The commodification of industry applications software. Industrial and Corporate Change 1(3): 489–514.
Clausen C, Williams R (1997) The social shaping of computer-aided production management and computer-integrated manufacture. Office of Official Publications of European Communities, Luxembourg.
Cornford J, Pollock N (2003) Putting the University Online: Information, Technology and Organizational Change. Open University Press, Milton Keynes, UK.
Ellingsen G, Monteiro E (2000) A patchwork planet: The heterogeneity of electronic patient record systems in hospitals. In Proceedings of the Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia (IRIS’2000), Uddevalla, Sweden, August.
Fincham R, Fleck J, Procter R, Scarbrough H, Tierney M, Williams R (1994) Expertise and Innovation: Information Technology Strategies in the Financial Services Sector. Oxford University Press, New York.
Fleck J (1988) The development of information integration: Beyond CIM? Edinburgh PICT Working Paper No. 9, Edinburgh University.
Hardstone G (April, 2002) PiMS Implementation: Preliminary feedback to BPCT, first interim report, unpublished (commercial-in-confidence).
Hartswood M, Procter R, Rouncefield M, Slack R, Voss A, Williams R (2001) Building information systems as universalised locals. In Dittrich K, Egyedi T (eds.) Special issue on standards, compatibility and infrastructure development. Journal of Knowledge, Technology and Policy 14(3): 90–108.
Heath C, Luff P (1996) Documents and professional practice: “Bad” organisational reasons for “good” clinical records. In Proceedings of CSCW’96, Boston, MA, November. ACM Press, pp. 354–362.
Heeks R, Munday D, Salazar A (1999) Why healthcare information systems succeed or fail. Institute for Development Policy and Management Working Paper Series No. 9. ISBN 1 9025 1825X. University of Manchester, Manchester.
Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Reddy M, Dourish P, Pratt W (2001) Coordinating heterogeneous work: Information and representation in medical care. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW’01), pp. 239–258.
Star SL (1989) The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2. Pitman, London.
Star S (1993). Cooperation without consensus in scientific problem solving: Dynamics of closure in open systems. In Easterbrook SM (ed.) CSCW: Cooperation or Conflict? Springer-Verlag, London, pp. 93–206.
Star SL, Griesemer JR (1989) Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19: 387–420.
Timmermans S, Berg M (1997). Standardization in action: Achieving universalism and localization in medical protocols. Social Studies of Science 27: 273–305.
Webster J, Williams R (1993) Mismatch and tension: Standard packages and non-standard users. In Quintas P (ed.) Social Dimensions of Systems Engineering: People, Processes, Policies and Software Development. Ellis Horwood, West Sussex, UK, pp. 179–196.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Anderson, S., Hardstone, G., Procter, R., Williams, R. (2008). Down in the (Data)base(ment): Supporting Configuration in Organizational Information Systems. In: Resources, Co-Evolution and Artifacts. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-901-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-901-9_9
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-900-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-901-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)