Skip to main content

Factor and Regression Analysis, Power and Profits in Supply Chains

  • Chapter
  • 180 Accesses

Abstract

The paper explains the iterative process i.e. the difficulties, problems and practical solutions, that researchers typically experience in arriving at a final version. The context of the paper concerns the importance of market power versus firm resources for firm profitability. Recent papers using descriptive variance components analysis on Federal Trade Commission Line of Business data have focused on the relative importance of industry effects versus firm effects regardless of their underlying causes. This study examines specific factors underlying industry effects, namely multiple buyer and supplier power concepts and uses a different methodology, factor and regression analyses, on an alternative sample from the Banque de France’s Sesame database. The results indicate that, in the sample, industry effects are more important than firm effects (as measured by relative market share) in explaining seller profitability and suggest that buyer power explains a much larger percentage of the variance in seller profitability than supplier power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bain, Joseph (1959), Barriers to New Competition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J (1986), “Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck and Business Strategy”, Management Science, October, pp. 1231–1241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradburd, Ralph (1982), “Price-Cost Margins in Producer Goods Industries and The Importance of Being Unimportant” “, Review of Economics and Statistics, 64, pp 405–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cool, Karel, Ingemar Dierickx, and David Jemison. (1989), “Business Strategy, Market Structure and Risk-

    Google Scholar 

  • Return Relationships: A Structural Approach.” Strategic Management Journal 10, pp 507–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, Peter (1986), “Business Margins and Buyer/Seller Power” Review of Economics and Statistics 68, pp 333–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, Harold (1973), “Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy” Journal of Law and Economics 16, pp 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx, Ingemar, and Karel Cool (1989), “Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage.” Management Science 35, pp 1504–1511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A and B. Nalebuff (1991), Thinking Strategically, New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R (1962), “Power-dependence Relations,” American Sociological Review 27, pp 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Isaac, Shaker Srivanasan, and Paul Vaaler (1996), “A Descriptive Alternative to Cluster Analysis: Understanding Strategic Group Performance with Simulated Annealing.” in Statistical Models for Strategic Management, edited by M. Ghertman, J. Obadia, and J-L. Arregle: Kluwer Publications. Galbraith, Craig, and Curt Stiles (1983), “Firm Profitability and Relative Firm Power.” Strategic Management Journal pp 237–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, John Kenneth (1952), American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power. Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, Joseph, Ralph Anderson, Ronald Tatham, and William Black (1995), Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, G. et al (1985), The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwoka (1979), “The Effect of Market Share Distribution on Industry Performance”, Review of Economics and Statistics: pp 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFrance, Vincent (1979), “The Impact of Buyer Concentration-An Extension.” Review of Economics and Statistics 61, pp 475–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lustgarten, Stephen (1975), “The Impact of Buyer Concentration in Manufacturing Industries.” Review of Economics and Statistics 57, pp 125–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G (1977), Econometrics, New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancke, Richard (1974), “Causes of Interfirm Profitability Differences: A New Interpretation of the Evidence” Quarterly Journal of Economics 88, pp 181–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Stephen (1983a), “Market, Firm, and Economic Performance” in Salomon Brothers Center for the Study of Financial Institutions. New York: New York University Graduate School of Business Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Stephen (1983b), “Vertical Relationships and Industrial Performance” Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 23, pp 6–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGahan, Anita, and Michael Porter (1996), “The Persistence of Profitability: Comparing the Market Structure and Chicago Views” Harvard Business School Manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuckin, Robert, and Heng Chen (1976), “Interactions Between Buyer and Seller Concentration and Industry Price Cost Margins” Industrial Organization Review, pp 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, Jeffrey, and Gerry Salancik (1978), The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York, N.Y.: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael (1980), Competitive Strategy. New York, N.Y.: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott, John E., Ajay K. Kohli, and N. Venkatraman (1986), “The Market Share-Profitability Relationship: An Empirical Assessment of Major Assertions and Contradictions” Strategic Management Journal 7, pp 377–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravenscraft, David (1983), “Structure-Profit Relationships at the Line of Business and Industry Level” Review of Economics and Statistics 65, pp 22–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, Richard P (1984), “Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm” in Competitive Strategic Management, edited by Robert Boyden Lamb: Prentice-Hall, pp 556–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R (1991), “How Much Does Industry Matter”, Strategic Management Journal, pp. 167–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, Thomas (1960), The Strategy of Conflict, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, Frederick, and David Ross (1990), Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Chicago, Ill.: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, Richard (1985), “Do Markets Differ Much” American Economic Review, pp 341–351. Schmalensee, Richard (1987), “Collusion versus Differential Efficiency: Testing Alternative Hypotheses” Journal of Industrial Economics, pp 399–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, Richard (1989), “Inter-Industry Studies of Structure and Performance” in Handbook of Industrial Organization, edited by R. Schmalensee and R. Willig. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, pp 952–1009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, William G (1972), “The Elements of Market Structure” The Review of Economics and Statistics pp 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H (1971), Principles of Econometrics, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, Birger (1984), “A Resource-Based View of the Firm.” Strategic Management Journal, pp 171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H, (1982a), “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models”, Econometrica, pp 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H (19826), “Instrumental Variables Regression with Independent Observations”, Econometrica,pp 483–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersema, Margarethe, and Bowen Harry (1996), “Empirical Methods in Strategy Research: Regression Analysis and the Use of Cross-Section Versus Pooled Time-Series, Cross-Section Data” in Statistical Models for Strategic Management, edited by J-L Arregle, M. Ghertman and J. Obadia, Kluwer Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E (1979), “Transaction Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations”, Journal of Law and Economics, October 1979, pp 233–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woo, Carolyn Y (1987), “Path Analysis of the Relationship Between Market Share, Business-Level Conduct and Risk”, Strategic Management Journal 8, pp 149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cool, K., Henderson, J. (1997). Factor and Regression Analysis, Power and Profits in Supply Chains. In: Ghertman, M., Obadia, J., Arregle, JL. (eds) Statistical Models for Strategic Management. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2614-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2614-5_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5186-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2614-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics