Abstract
Human beings have a sophisticated ability to reason about the minds of others, often referred to as using one’s theory of mind or mentalizing. Just like any other cognitive ability, people engage in reasoning about other minds when it seems useful for achieving particular goals, but this ability remains disengaged otherwise. We suggest that understanding the factors that engage our ability to reason about the minds of others helps to explain anthropomorphism: cases in which people attribute minds to a wide range of nonhuman agents, including animals, mechanical and technological objects, and supernatural entities such as God. We suggest that engagement is guided by two basic motivations: (1) the motivation to explain and predict others’ actions, and (2) the motivation to connect socially with others. When present, these motivational forces can lead people to attribute minds to almost any agent. When absent, the likelihood of attributing a mind to others, even other human beings, decreases. We suggest that understanding the factors that engage our theory of mind can help to explain the inverse process of dehumanization, and also why people might be indifferent to other people even when connecting to them would improve their momentary wellbeing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Abraham, A.T., Pocheptsova, A., Ferraro, R. (2012). The effect of mobile phone use on prosocial behavior. Unpublished manuscript, University of Maryland.
Apperly, I. A., Riggs, K. J., Simpson, A., Chiavarino, C., & Samson, D. (2006). Is belief reasoning automatic? Psychological Science, 17, 841–844.
Atran, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2004). Religion’s evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 713–770.
Avery, M. E. (1993). Preface. In K. J. S. Anand & P. J. McGrath (Eds.), Pain in neonates. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Aydin, N., Fischer, P., & Frey, D. (2010). The effects of social exclusion on religiousness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 742–753.
Aydin, N., Krüger, J., Fischer, J., Hahn, D., Frey, D., Kastenmüller, A., et al. (2012). A man´s best friend—how the presence of a dog decreases mental distress after social exclusion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 446–449.
Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
Baron-Cohen, S. (2002). The extreme male brain theory in autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 248–254.
Barr, D. J., & Keysar, B. (2004). Making sense of how we make sense: The paradox of egocentrism in language use. In H. L. Colston & A. N. Katz (Eds.), Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural influences. Mahwaw: Erlbaum.
Bastian, B., & Haslam, N. (2010). Excluded from humanity: the dehumanizing effects of social ostracism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 107–113.
Baumeister, R. F., Masicampo, E. J., & Vohs, K. D. (2011). Do conscious thoughts cause behavior? Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 331–361.
Bering, J. M. (2006). The cognitive science of souls: Clarifications and extensions of the evolutionary model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29, 486–498.
Castelli, F., Frith, C., Happe, F., & Frith, U. (2002). Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 125, 1839–1849.
Chamberlain, B., Kasari, C., & Rotheram-Fuller, E. (2007). Involvement or isolation. The social networks of children with autism in regular classrooms. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 230–242.
Chevallier, C., Kohls, G., Troiani, V., Brodkin, E. S., & Schultz, R. T. (2012a). The social motivation theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 231–239.
Chevallier, C., Molesworth, C., & Happé, F. (2012b). Diminished social motivation negatively impacts reputation management: autism spectrum disorders as a case in point. PLoS ONE, 7, e31107.
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 08–205 (2010).
Cunningham, W. A., & Brosch, T. (2012). Motivational salience: amygdala tuning from traits, needs, values, and goals. Psychological Science, 21(1), 54–59.
Dando-Collins, S. (2004). Standing Bear is a person: the true story of a Native American’s quest for justice. Cambridge: Da Capo Press.
DeCasper, A. J., & Fifer, W. P. (1980). Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mothers’ voices. Science, 208, 1174–1176.
Demoulin, S., Leyens, J. P., Paladino, M. P., Rodriguez, R. T., Rodriguez, A. P., & Dovidio, J. F. (2004). Dimensions of “uniquely” and “nonuniquely” human emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 71–96.
Dennett, D. C. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13, 80–83.
Epley, N. & Schroeder, J. (2012). Mistakenly seeking solitude. Unpublished manuscript.
Epley, N. (2008). Solving the (real) other minds problem. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1455–1474.
Epley, N., & Waytz, A. (2010). Mind perception. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindsay (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (5th ed., pp. 498–541). New York: Wiley.
Epley, N., Akalis, S., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008a). Creating social connection through inferential reproduction: Loneliness and perceived agency in gadgets, gods, and greyhounds. Psychological Science, 19, 114–120.
Epley, N., Waytz, A., Akalis, S., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008b). When we need a human: Motivational determinants of anthropomorphism. Social Cognition, 26, 143–155.
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114, 864–886.
Farah, M. J., & Heberlein, A. S. (2007). Personhood and neuroscience: Naturalizing or nihilating? American Journal of Bioethics, 7, 37–48.
Feith, D. (2011). Will the lights go out in the NFL? The Wall Street Journal. Accessed at http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704415104576066153465352540.html.
Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621–628.
Fleeson, W., Malanos, A. B., & Achille, N. M. (2002). An intraindividual process approach to the relationship between extraversion and positive affect: Is acting extraverted as “good” as being extraverted? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1409–1422.
Gaunt, R., Leyens, J. P., & Demoulin, S. (2002). Intergroup relations and the attribution of emotions: control over memory for secondary emotions associated with ingroup versus outgroup. Journal of Experiment Social Psychology, 38, 508–514.
Gebauer, J. E., & Maio, G. R. (2012). The need to belong can motivate belief in god. Journal of Personality, 80, 465–501.
Gilovich, T., Kruger, J., & Savitsky, K. (1999). Everyday egocentrism and everyday interpersonal problems. In R. M. Kowalski & M. R. Leary (Eds.), The social psychology of emotional and behavioral problems: Interfaces of social and clinical psychology (pp. 69–95). Washington, DC: APA Books.
Goff, P. A., Eberhardt, J. L., Williams, M., & Jackson, M. C. (2008). Not yet human: Implicit knowledge, historical dehumanization, and contemporary consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 292–306.
Graham, T., & Ickes, W. (1997). When women’s intuition isn’t greater than men’s. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Empathic accuracy (pp. 117–143). New York: Guilford.
Gray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315, 619.
Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2010). Blaming God for our pain: human suffering and the divine mind. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 7–16.
Gruenfeld, D. H., Inesi, M. E., Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Power and the objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 111–127.
Guthrie, S. (1993). Faces in the clouds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hall, J. A., & Schmid-Mast, M. (2008). Are women always more interpersonally sensitive than men? Impact of goals and content domain. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 144–155.
Haque, O. S., & Waytz, A. (2012). Dehumanization in medicine: Causes, solutions, and functions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 176–186.
Harris, L. T., & Fiske, L. T. (2006). Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: Neuroimaging responses to extreme outgroups. Psychological Science, 17, 847–853.
Harrison, M. A., & Hall, A. E. (2010). Anthropomorphism, empathy, and perceived communicative ability vary with phylogenetic relatedness to humans. The Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 4, 34–48.
Haslam, N., Loughnan, S., Holland, E. (2013). The psychology of humanness. In S.J. Gervais (Ed.), Objectification and dehumanization (pp. 25–52). New York: Springer.
Hebb, D. O. (1946). Emotion in man and animal: an analysis of the intuitive processes of recognition. Psychological Review, 53, 88–106.
Heberlein, A. S., & Adolphs, R. (2004). Perception in the absence of social attribution: selective impairment in anthropomorphizing following bilateral amygdala damage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 7487–7491.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243–249.
Herrmann, E., Call, J., Hernández-Lloreda, M. V., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Humans have evolved specialized skills of social cognition: the cultural intelligence hypothesis. Science, 317, 1360–1366.
Hill, J. B. (2000). The legacy of Luna: the story of a tree, a woman, and the struggle to save the Redwoods. New York: HarperCollins.
Horowitz, A. (2009). Inside of a dog: What dogs see, smell, and know. New York: Scribner.
Howlin, P., Goode, S., Hutton, J., & Rutter, M. (2004). Adult outcome for children with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 212–229.
Hume, D. (1957). The natural history of religion. Stanford: Stanford University Press (Original work published 1757).
Humphrey, N. (1976). The social function of intellect. In P. P. G. Bateson & R. A. Hinde (Eds.), Growing points in ethology. Oxford: Cambridge University Press.
Humphrey, N. (2002). Bugs and beasts before the law. In N. Humphrey (Ed.), The Mind Made Flesh: Essays from the Frontiers of Psychology and Evolution (pp. 235–254). New York: Oxford University Press.
Ickes, W. (2003). Everyday mind reading: Understanding what other people think and feel. Amherst: Prometheus Books.
Ickes, W., Gesn, P. R., & Graham, T. (2000). Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation? Personal Relationships, 7, 95–109.
Izuma, K., Matsumoto, K., Camerer, C. F., & Adolphs, R. (2011). Insensitivity to social reputation in autism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 17302–17307.
Johnson, S. C. (2003). Detecting agents. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 358, 549–559.
Jones, W., Carr, K., & Klin, A. (2008). Absence of preferential looking to the eyes of approaching adults predicts level of social disability in 2-year-old toddlers with autism spectrum disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 65, 946–954.
Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192–240). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Klin, A., Jones, W., Schultz, R., Volkmar, F. R., & Cohen, D. J. (2002). Visual fixation patterns during viewing of naturalistic social situations as predictors of social competence in individuals with autism. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 809–816.
Kozak, M. J., Marsh, A. A., & Wegner, D. M. (2006). What do I think you’re doing? Action identification and mind attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 543–555.
Kraus, M. W., Cote, S., & Keltner, D. (2010). Social class, contextualism, and empathic accuracy. Psychological Science, 21, 1716–1723.
Krienen, F. M., Tu, P., & Buckner, R. L. (2010). Clan mentality: evidence that the medial prefrontal cortex responds to close others. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 13906–13915.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lesher, J.H. (Trans.) (1992). Xenophanes of Colophon: fragments. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Leyens, J. P., Paladino, P. M., Rodriguez, R. T., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S., Rodriguez, A. P., et al. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The role of secondary emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 186–197.
Locke, J. (1997). An essay concerning human understanding. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books (Original work published 1841).
Luczak, H., Roetting, M., & Schmidt, L. (2003). Let’s talk: anthropomorphization as a means to cope with stress of interacting with technical devices. Ergonomics, 46, 1361–1374.
Martin, A., & Weisberg, J. (2003). Neural foundations for understanding social and mechanical concepts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 575–587.
McConnell, A. R., Brown, C. M., Shoda, T. M., Stayton, L. E., & Martin, C. E. (2011). Friends with benefits: On the positive consequences of pet ownership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1239–1252.
Medin, D. L., & Atran, S. (2004). The native mind: biological categorization and reasoning in development and across cultures. Psychological Review, 111, 960–983.
Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198, 75–78.
Morewedge, C.K. (2006). A mind of its own: Negativity bias in the perception of intentional agency. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
Morewedge, C. K., Preston, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2007). Timescale bias in the attribution of mind. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1–11.
Nickerson, R. S. (1999). How we know—and sometimes misjudge—what others know: imputing one’s own knowledge to others. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 737–759.
Norenzayan, A., & Shariff, A. F. (2008). The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science, 322, 58–62.
Osterling, J. A., Dawson, G., & Munson, J. A. (2002). Early recognition of 1-year-old infants with autism spectrum disorder versus mental retardation. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 239–251.
Piaget, J. (1929). The child’s conception of the world. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Riby, D. M., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2008). Viewing it differently: social scene perception in Williams syndrome and autism. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2855–28600.
Serpell, J. A. (2003). Anthropomorphism and anthropomorphic selection: beyond the “cute response”. Society & Animals, 11, 83–100.
Shaw, G. (1901). Three plays for puritans. Chicago and New York: Herbert S. Stone and Company.
Sherman, G.D. & Chandler, J. (2012). Cuteness cues elicit anthropomorphism. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University.
Sherman, G. D., & Haidt, J. (2011). Cuteness and disgust: the humanizing and dehumanizing effects of emotion. Emotion Review, 3, 245–251.
Sherrod, L. R. (1979). Social cognition in infants: attention to the human face. Infant Behavior and Development, 2, 279–294.
Singer, P. W. (2009). Wired for war: The robotics revolution and conflict in the 21st century. New York: Penguin Press.
Spitzer, G. (2011). Clever apes (Episode #19). Chicago: WBEZ.
Sproull, L., Subramani, M., Kiesler, S., Walker, J. H., & Waters, K. (1996). When the interface is a face. Human–Computer Interaction, 11, 97–124.
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675–735.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human rights. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/.
Van Kleef, G. A., Oveis, C., Van der Löwe, I., LuoKogan, A., Goetz, J., & Keltner, D. (2009). Power, distress, and compassion: turning a blind eye to the suffering of others. Psychological Science, 19, 1315–1322.
Wantanabe, S. (2007). How animal psychology contributes to animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 106, 193–202.
Waytz, A., & Epley, N. (2012). Social connection enables dehumanization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 70–76.
Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J., Epley, N. (2012). Loneliness and anthropomorphic representations of the universe are positively correlated. Unpublished data, University of Chicago.
Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J. T., & Epley, N. (2010a). Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 219–232.
Waytz, A., Epley, N., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010b). Social cognition unbound: psychological insights into anthropomorphism and dehumanization. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 58–62.
Waytz, A., Gray, K., Epley, N., & Wegner, D. M. (2010c). Causes and consequences of mind perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 14, 383–388.
Waytz, A., Morewedge, C. K., Epley, N., Monteleone, G., Gao, J.-H., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010d). Making sense by making sentient: effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 410–435.
White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297–331.
Xu, X., Zuo, X., Wang, X., & Han, S. (2009). Do you feel my pain? Racial group membership modulates empathic neural responses. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 8525–8529.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Epley, N., Schroeder, J., Waytz, A. (2013). Motivated Mind Perception: Treating Pets as People and People as Animals. In: Gervais, S. (eds) Objectification and (De)Humanization. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, vol 60. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6959-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6959-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6958-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6959-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)