Skip to main content

Conclusion: Building on the Strengths of Interdisciplinarity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter concludes The role of criticism in understanding problem solving. In it, the overall message of the book—that criticism and critical theories can serve to aid critical reading and synthesis of the educational technology research literature—is summarized. One of the strengths of the educational technology field is its interdisciplinarity. As students enter the field from many different academic disciplines, they should be encouraged to apply not just the content of their former disciplines but also the strategies of and frameworks for thinking about problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1979). La distinction: Critique sociale du jugement [Distinction: Social critique of judgment]. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2004). Science of science and reflexivity (R. Nice, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullough, R. V., Jr. (2006). Developing interdisciplinary researchers: What ever happened to humanities in education? Educational Researcher, 35(8), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhart, M., & DeHaan, R. L. (2005). Doctoral preparation of scientifically based education researchers. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Belland’s work on this chapter was supported by Early CAREER Grant 0953046 from the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, or conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent official positions of NSF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian R. Belland .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Belland, B.R., Fee, S.B. (2012). Conclusion: Building on the Strengths of Interdisciplinarity. In: Fee, S., Belland, B. (eds) The Role of Criticism in Understanding Problem Solving. Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies, vol 5. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3540-2_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics