Spatial Optimization and Geographic Uncertainty: Implications for Sex Offender Management Strategies
Purchase on Springer.com
$29.95 / €24.95 / £19.95*
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Residence restrictions are increasingly popular policy-based tools for managing the spatial distribution of sex offenders in the USA.
Frequently implemented with limited study or practical guidance, it is likely that spatial uncertainty in many evaluative efforts creates interpretive and policy questions. For example, sex offender locations, prohibited areas, proximity evaluation, and travel uncertainties all have the potential to jeopardize analysis, policy development, and enforcement, but, more importantly, have the potential to raise legitimacy issues and obscure the interpretation of impacts. The purpose of this chapter is to examine the effects of spatial uncertainty in the context of sex offender analysis and management as well as review spatial optimization approaches to support this. This work enables a framework and direction for improving the quality of sex offender analysis and also provides the basis for quantifying certainty relative to data quality.
Supplementary Material (0)
- Abler, R. (1987). The National Science Foundation Center for geographic information and analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 1, 303–326. CrossRef
- American Civil Liberties Union [ACLU]. (2005). ACLU Ask U.S. Supreme Court to review Iowa’s sex offender residency restriction. http://www.aclu.org/racial-justice_prisoners-rights_drug-law-reform_immigrants-rights/aclu-asks-us-supreme-court-review- Last Accessed 07/31/11.
- American Civil Liberties Union [ACLU]. (2009). ACLU challenges Miami-Dade County’s 2,500-foot sex offender residency restriction. http://www.aclufl.org/news_events/?action=viewRelease&emailAlertID=3760 Last Accessed 07/31/11.
- Asami, Y., & Isard, W. (1989). Imperfect information, uncertainty and optimal sampling in location theory: an initial reexamination of Hotelling, Weber, and Von Thunen. Journal of Regional Science, 29, 507–521. CrossRef
- Bedarf, A. (1995). Examining sex offender community notification laws. California Law Review, 83, 885–939. CrossRef
- Boyd, S. (2008). Allouez restrictions on sex offenders unchanged. Green Bay Press Gazette. http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20081222/GPG0101/812220535/1207/GPG01 Last Accessed 07/31/11.
- Cayo, M. R., & Talbot, T. O. (2003). Positional error in automated geocoding of residential addresses. International Journal of Health Geographics, 3, 5.
- Chaiken, J. M. (1998). Sex offenders and offending: Learning more from national data collection programs. National Conference on Sex Offender Registries. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
- Chajewski, M., & Calkins Mercado, C. (2009). An evaluation of sex offender residency restriction functioning in town, county and city-wide jurisdictions. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20(1), 44–61. CrossRef
- Cohen, M., & Jeglic, M. L. (2007). Sex offender legislation in the United States. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51, 369–383. CrossRef
- Curtis, K. (2003). California ‘Loses’ 33,000 sex offenders. Associated Press. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/01/08/national/main535654.shtml Last Accessed 07/31/11.
- Curtin, K.M. & R.L. Church. (2006). A Family of Multiple-Type Discrete Dispersion Models. Geographical Analysis, 38(3), 248–270.
- Dangermond, J. (1988). A review of digital data commonly available and some of the practical problems of entering them into a GIS. In W. J. Ripple (Ed.), Fundamentals of geographic information systems: a compendium (pp. 41–58). Bethesda, MD: American Congress on Surveying and Mapping.
- Duwe, G., Donnay, W., & Tewksbury, R. (2008). Does residential proximity matter? A geographic analysis of sex offense recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 484. CrossRef
- Eakins, P. (2008). Long beach neighbourhood fights to move sex offenders. Press-Telegram. http://www.presstelegram.com/news/ci_8291281 Last Accessed 01/31/11.
- Environmental Systems Research Institute [ESRI]. (2010). Euclidean distance algorithm. http://webhelp.esri.com/arcgisdesktop/9.3/index.cfm?TopicName=Euclidean_Distance_algorithm Last Accessed 07/31/11.
- Freeman, N.H., & Sandler, J.C. (2010). The Adam Walsh Act: a false sense of security or an effective public policy?. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 21(1), 31–49.
- Goodchild, M. F. (1972). The trade area of a displaced hexagonal lattice point. Geographical Analysis, 4, 105–107. CrossRef
- Goodchild, M. F., & Gopal, S. (1989). Accuracy of spatial databases. London: Taylor and Francis.
- Grubesic, T. H. (2010). Sex offender clusters. Applied Geography, 30(1), 2–18. CrossRef
- Grubesic, T.H., & Murray, A.T. (2004). Assessing the locational uncertainties of geocoded data. Proceedings from the 24th Urban Data Management Symposium. Chioggia, Italy.
- Grubesic, T. H., & Murray, A. T. (2008). Sex offender residency and spatial equity. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 1(3), 175–192. CrossRef
- Grubesic, T. H., & Murray, A. T. (2009). Methods to support the evaluation of sex offender laws. Papers in Regional Science, 89(3), 669–684. CrossRef
- Harris, A. J., & Lobanov-Rostovsky, C. (2010). Implementing the Adam Walsh Act’s sex offender registration and notification provisions: a survey of the states. Criminal Justice Research Policy, 21(2), 202–222. CrossRef
- Jones, C. B. (1997). Geographical information systems and computer cartography. Harlow: Longman.
- Larson, R. C., & Stevenson, K. A. (1972). On sensitivities in urban redistricting and facility location. Operations Research, 20, 595–612. CrossRef
- Leung, Y., Ma, J.-H., & Goodchild, M. F. (2004a). A general framework for error analysis in measurement-based GIS. Part 1: the basic measurement-error model and related concepts. Journal of Geographical Systems, 6, 325–354. CrossRef
- Leung, Y., Ma, J.-H., & Goodchild, M. F. (2004b). A general framework for error analysis in measurement-based GIS. Part 3: error analysis in intersections and overlays. Journal of Geographical Systems, 6, 381–402. CrossRef
- Leung, Y., Ma, J.-H., & Goodchild, M. F. (2004c). A general framework for error analysis in measurement-based GIS. Part 4: error analysis in length and area measurements. Journal of Geographical Systems, 6, 403–428. CrossRef
- Longley, P. A., Goodchild, M. F., Maguire, D. J., & Rhind, D. W. (2005). Geographic information systems and science (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
- Love, R. F., Morris, J. G., & Wesolowsky, G. O. (1988). Facility location: models and methods. New York: North-Holland.
- Matson, S. (1999). Sex offender registration: policy overview and comprehensive practices. http://www.csom.org/pubs/sexreg.html Last Accessed 07/31/11.
- Mazza, S. (2008). Gardena gets tougher on sex offenders. Daily Breeze. http://www.dailybreeze.com/ci_9834634 Last Accessed 01/31/11.
- Meloy, M. L., Miller, S. L., & Curtis, K. M. (2008). Making sense out of nonsense: the deconstruction of state-level sex offender residence restrictions. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(2), 209–222. CrossRef
- Miller, H. J., & Wentz, E. A. (2003). Representation and spatial analysis in geographic information systems. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(3), 574–594. CrossRef
- Mulford, C. F., Wilson, R. E., & Parmley, A. M. (2009). Geographic aspects of sex offender residency restrictions. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20(1), 3–12. CrossRef
- Murray, A. T. (2003). Site placement uncertainty in location analysis. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 27, 205–221. CrossRef
- Murray, A. T., & O’Kelly, M. E. (2002). Assessing representation error in point-based coverage modeling. Journal of Geographical Systems, 4, 171–191. CrossRef
- Mustaine, E. E., Tewksbury, R., & Stengel, K. M. (2006). Residential location and mobility of registered sex offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 30(2), 177. CrossRef
- National Center for Missing and Exploited Children [NCMEC]. (2010). Map of registered sex offenders in the United States. http://www.missingkids.com/en_US/documents/sex-offender-map.pdf Last Accessed 07/31/11.
- Openshaw, S., & Taylor, P. (1981). The modifiable areal unit problem. In N. Wrigley & R. Bennett (Eds.), Quantitative geography: a British view (pp. 60–69). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- Peterson, A. T., & Cohoon, K. P. (1999). Sensitivity of distributional prediction algorithms to geographic data completeness. Ecological Modelling, 117, 159–164. CrossRef
- Ratcliffe, J. H. (2001). On the accuracy of TIGER-type geocoded address data in relation to cadastral and census areal units. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15, 473–485. CrossRef
- Robinson, L. O. (2003). Sex offender management: the public policy challenges. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 1–7. CrossRef
- Robinson, A. H., Morrison, J. L., Muehrcke, P. C., Kimerling, A. J., & Guptill, S. C. (1995). Elements of cartography (6th ed.). New York: Wiley.
- Sample, L. L., & Kadleck, C. (2008). Sex offender laws: legislators’ accounts of the need for policy. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19(1), 40–62. CrossRef
- Thomas, T. (2005). When public protection becomes punishment? The UK use of civil measures to contain the sex offender. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 10, 337–351. CrossRef
- United States Census Bureau [Census]. (2001). Scale, generalization, and limitations of the cartographic boundary files. http://www.census.gov/geo/www/cob/scale.html Last Accessed 07/31/11.
- Verigin, H. (1999). Data quality parameters. In P. A. Longley, M. F. Goodchild, D. J. Maguire, & D. W. Rhind (Eds.), Geographical information systems: principles and technical issues. New York: Wiley.
- Winston, W. L. (2004). Operations research: applications and algorithms (4th ed.). New York: Wadsworth.
- Zandbergen, P. A. (2008). Does residential proximity matter? A geographic analysis of sex offender recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1449. Commentary on Duwe, Donnay, and Tewksbury (2008). CrossRef
- Zandbergen, P. A., & Hart, T. C. (2009). Geocoding accuracy considerations in determining residency restrictions for sex offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20(1), 62–90. CrossRef
- Zgoba, K. M., Levenson, J. A., & McKee, T. (2009). Examining the impact of sex offender residence restrictions on housing availability. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20(1), 91–110. CrossRef
About this Chapter
- Spatial Optimization and Geographic Uncertainty: Implications for Sex Offender Management Strategies
- Book Title
- Community-Based Operations Research
- Book Subtitle
- Decision Modeling for Local Impact and Diverse Populations
- pp 121-142
- Print ISBN
- Online ISBN
- Series Title
- International Series in Operations Research & Management Science
- Series Volume
- Series ISSN
- Springer New York
- Copyright Holder
- Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- eBook Packages
- Michael P. Johnson (ID1)
- Editor Affiliations
- ID1. Dept. Public Policy & Public Affairs, University of Massachusetts, Boston
- Author Affiliations
- 1. GeoDa Center for Geospatial Analysis and Computation, School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
- 2. Geographic Information Systems and Spatial Analysis Laboratory, College of Information Science and Technology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
To view the rest of this content please follow the download PDF link above.