Abstract
In this chapter, six important areas of ethical concern for practitioners working in the area of oocyte and embryo donation are reviewed: (1) patient/donor relationships, (2) ethical limits on the amount and manner of payment, (3) ethical issues raised in the law concerning donation, (4) ethical issues in the preimplantation diagnosis of donor embryos, (5) controversy over the use of tissue from aborted fetuses and cadavers, and (6) the ethics of cryopreservation of eggs and embryos, including those retrieved from the deceased.
Throughout the chapter, we emphasize two primary ethical principles. First, no reproduction should occur without consent. All parties involved in the process of donation, donors, and recipients must understand and agree to the procedure and specifically to the uses of donated gametes and embryos. Although protecting donors against all hazards may be impossible, clinicians have a responsibility to endeavor to protect all parties from all known hazards, particularly reproduction without consent. Second, the donation of gametes and embryos must be appropriately compensated. The donor of reproductive material must be compensated both at a level and in a manner consistent with the real risks involved in particular procedures, respect for the dignity of the donor, and in financial amounts that are reasonable for the expected use of the materials.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
McGee G. Subject to payment? JAMA. 1997;3:199–200.
Braverman A, Corson SL. Factors related to preferences in gamete donor sources. Fertil Steril. 1995;63:543–9.
Sauer MV, Paulson RJ. Understanding the current status of oocyte donation in the United States: what’s really going on out there? Fertil Steril. 1992;58:16–8.
Rosenberg H, Epstein Y. Follow-up study of anonymous ovum donors. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:2741–7.
Broderick P, Walker I. Information access and donated gametes: how much do we know about who wants to know? Hum Reprod. 1995;10:3338–41.
Soderstrom-Anttila V. Follow-up study of Finnish volunteer oocyte donors concerning their attitudes to oocyte donation. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:3071–6.
Hoffman J. Egg donations meet a need and raise ethical questions. New York Times, 8 Jan 1996. pp. 1, 10.
McGee G. Trial and tribulations: legislating gestation. Hum Reprod. 1997;3:407–11.
Shenfield F, Steele SJ. Why gamete donors should not be paid. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:253–5.
Ahuja KK, Simons EG. Anonymous egg donors and dignity. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1151–4.
American Fertility Society. Guidelines for oocyte donation. Fertil Steril. 1993;59(2):55–75.
Nevins B. The $2000 egg. Redbook, November 1992. pp. 119–26.
Sauer MV. Oocyte donation: reflections on past work and future directions. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1150.
Rodriguez del Pozo P. Paying donors and the ethics of blood supply. J Med Ethics. 1994;20:31–5.
Greenfield DA, Mazure CM, Olive DL, et al. Similarities and differences between anonymous and directed candidates for oocyte donation. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995;12:118–22.
Pennings G. Should donors have the right to decide who receives their gametes? Hum Reprod. 1995;10:2736–40.
Ahuja KK, Simons EG, Fiamanya W, et al. Egg-sharing in assisted conception: ethical and practical considerations. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1126–31.
Sauer MV, Paulson RJ. Oocyte donors: a demographic analysis of women at the University of Southern California. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:726–8.
Schenker JG, Shushan A. Ethical and legal aspects of assisted reproduction practice in Asia. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:908–11.
Caplan AL, Am I. My brother’s keeper? Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1998.
McGee G. The perfect baby: a pragmatic approach to genetics. New York: Rowman & Littlefield; 1997.
Gabriel T. Eggs and egos; Cornell staff clashed over issue of safety. The New York Times. 7 Jan 1996.
Raeburn JA. Commentary: preimplantation diagnosis raises a philosophical dilemma. Br Med J. 1995;311:540.
Stein M. Making babies or playing god? Family Circle. 20 Sept 1994.
Kazem R, Thompson LA, Hamilton MPR, et al. Current attitudes towards egg donation among men and women. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1543–8.
Lyall H, Murray E, Glaiser A, et al. Donated ovarian tissue in embryo research and assisted conception—the view of women of reproductive age. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1242–5.
Caplan AL. Due consideration. New York: Wiley; 1997.
Novaes S, Salem T. Embedding the embryo. Paper presented at the second plenary conference of the European Commission Research Project, “Fertility, infertility, and the human embryo,” 21–23 Oct 1994, Barcelona. p. 3.
Robertson JA. Ethical and legal issues in human embryo donation. Fertil Steril. 1995;64:885–93.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge assistance from Silke Weineck in the preparation of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McGee, G., Anchor-Samuels, J., Caplan, A.L. (2013). Ethical Issues in Oocyte and Embryo Donation. In: Sauer, M. (eds) Principles of Oocyte and Embryo Donation. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2392-7_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2392-7_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2391-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2392-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)