Designing Effective E-Learning Environments - Should We Use Still Pictures, Animations or Interactivity?
Purchase on Springer.com
$29.95 / €24.95 / £19.95*
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
There has been much research interest in the area of multimedia learning and using e-learning to assist student learning. A range of tools and teaching materials are used to develop students’ understanding in different domains. We have developed an online chemistry module with three different versions, designed to determine the most effective way for enhancing student learning and addressing misconceptions students may have. One version incorporates the use of still pictures, one version uses animations and simulations, and the final version uses animations and simulations together with interactivity. The present study investigated students’ perception of the modules and performance associated with using these different versions of the module. While students rated the animated and interactive versions of the module more highly than the one that had still pictures only, this did not translate to increased performance in associated tests.
- Mayer, RE and Moreno, R (1998) A Split-Attention Effect in Multimedia Learning: Evidence for Dual Processing Systems in Working Memory. J Educ Psychol 90:312–320. CrossRef
- Craincross, S and Manion, M (2001) Interactive Multimedia and Learning: Realising the Benefits. Innov Educ Teach Int 38:156–164. CrossRef
- Littlejohn, A, Suckling, C, Campbell, L et al (2002) The Amazing Patient Tutor: Student’s Interactions with an Online Carbohydrate Chemistry Course. Brit J Educ Technol 33:313–321. CrossRef
- Masterman, E and Rogers, Y (2002) A Framework for Designing Interactive Multimedia to Scaffold Young Children’s Understanding of Historical Chronology. Instr Sci 30:221–241. CrossRef
- Kennedy, GE (2004) Promoting Cognition in Multimedia Interactivity Research. J of Interact Learn Res 15:43–61.
- Scott, B (2001) Conversation Theory: A Constructivist Dialogical Approach to Educational Technology. Cybern Hum Knowing 8:1–25.
- Giardina, M (1992) Interactivity and Intelligent Advisory Considerations. In: Giardina, M (ed.), Interactive Multimedia Learning Environments, pp. 48–66. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. CrossRef
- Laurillard, D (1995) Multimedia and the Changing Experience of the Learner. Brit J Educ Technol 26:179–189. CrossRef
- Norman, D (1988) The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York.
- Read, J, George, AV, Masters, A et al (2004) Proceedings of the Scholarly Inquiry into Science Teaching and Learning Symposium. In: Merrett, D (ed.) Students’ Perceptions of Their Understanding in Chemistry 1 for Veterinary Science, pp. 45–51. UniServe Science, Sydney, NSW.
- Hutchings, GA, Hall, W and Colbourn, CJ (1993) Patterns of Students’ Interactions with a Hypermedia System. Interact Comput 5:295–313. CrossRef
- Lustria, MLA (2007) Can Interactivity Make a Difference? Effects of Interactivity on the Comprehension of and Attitudes toward Online Health Content. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec 58:766–776. CrossRef
- Aldrich, F, Rogers, Y and Scaife, M (1998) Getting to Grips With “Interactivity”: Helping Teachers Access the Educational Value of Cd-Roms. Brit J Educ Technol 29:321–332. CrossRef
- Rogers, Y and Scaife, M (1997) How Can Interactive Multimedia Facilitate Learning? In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Intelligence and Multimodalities in Multimedia, pp. 123–142. The Live Oak Press.
- Designing Effective E-Learning Environments - Should We Use Still Pictures, Animations or Interactivity?
- Book Title
- Chemistry Education in the ICT Age
- pp 235-247
- Print ISBN
- Online ISBN
- Springer Netherlands
- Copyright Holder
- Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
- Additional Links
- eBook Packages
- Editor Affiliations
- ID1. Faculty of Science, University of Mauritius
- ID2. Faculty of Science, University of Mauritius
- ID3. Faculty of Science, University of Mauritius
- ID4. Faculty of Science, University of Mauritius
- Author Affiliations
- 1. School of Chemistry, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
- 2. Faculty of Education and Social Work, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
To view the rest of this content please follow the download PDF link above.