Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How Do You Get to Carnegie Hall? Gifted Education in New York City

  • Chapter
International Handbook on Giftedness

Abstract

New York City provides a dynamic case study of problems and possibilities in urban gifted education. The story is grounded globally in changing understandings of teaching, learning, and expertise, based on converging evidence from developmental psychology, neuroscience, cognitive science, and education. Diverse forces are at play locally, including bottom-up and top-down political pressures, concerns about equity and social justice, media responses, and changing legislation and standards. Resulting changes in NYC educational practice are interpreted as a movement toward a mastery model of giftedness, including providing a flexible range of programming options to address individual students’ diverse gifted learning needs, expanded teacher development and networking opportunities, and changing identification policies. Recommendations focus on urban concerns and opportunities, with an emphasis on the importance to gifted development of practice, practice, practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 669.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ambrose, D. (2006). From the editor’s desk. Roeper Review, 28, 2, 60–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assouline, S. G., Colangelo, N., Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. E., Lipscomb, J., & Forstadt, L. (2003). The Iowa acceleration scale (2nd ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago, IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomberg, M. (2005, January). 2005 State of the city address. Retrieved August 28, 2006, from http://www.gothamgazette.com/article/searchlight/20050111/203/1243

  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borland, J. H. (2003). Evaluating gifted programs: A broader perspective. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp.293–310). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracken, B. A., & Brown, E. F. (2006) Behavioral identification and assessment of gifted andtalented students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24(2), 112–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, E., Avery, L., VanTassel-Baska, J., Worley, B., & Stambaugh, T. (2006). A Five-State analysis of gifted education policy. Roeper Review, 29(1), 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, C. M. (2000). Evaluation as a critical component of program development and implementation. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp.537–547). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, C. M. (2003). Searching for answers or creating more questions? A response to Robinson. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26, 274–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students. Iowa City, IO: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Education and the Law. (2003, Spring). Ending discrimination in gifted education in the New York City public schools. The Record, 58(2), 174–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council for Exceptional Children. (2003). What every special educator must know: Ethics, standards, and guidelines for special educators (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, D. Y. (2009). Essential tensions in conceptions of giftedness: A historical-dialectical perspective. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), Handbook of gifted education. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, D. Y., & Renzulli, J. S. (2008). Snowflakes, living systems, and the mystery of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs, D. (2006, September). How to be a genius. New Scientist, 2569, 40–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., Hoffman, R. J. (2006). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. Y. (2003a). Desegregating gifted education: Seeking equity for culturally diverse students. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp.143–158). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. Y. (2003b). Two other wrongs don’t make a right: Sacrificing the needs of diverse students does not solve gifted education’s unresolved problems. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26, 283–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fruchter, N., & Siegel, D. (2004, November 28). Point/counterpoint: Are gifted programs good? No. The Daily News, p.46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. G. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, M. (2006, March 19). Smart kids need not apply. New York Daily News. p.33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried, A., Gottfried, A. E., & Guerin, D. W. (in press). Issues in early prediction and identification of intellectual giftedness. In F. D. Horowitz, R. F. Subotnik, & D. J. Matthews (Eds.), The development of giftedness and talent: A life-span perspective. Washington: APA Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herszenhorn, D. (2005, October 22). Under siege on schools, mayor pledges new programs. New York Times, p. B2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, F. D. (1987). A developmental view of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31(4), 165–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, F. D., & O’Brien, M. (Eds.). (1985). The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, F. D., Subotnik, R. F., & Matthews, D. J. (in progress). The development of giftedness and talent across the life-span. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, M. J. A. (1990). The origins of exceptional abilities. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, C. E., & Murawski, W. A. (2001). Lessons from another field: Applying co-teaching strategies to gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45(3), 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., & Jessel, T. M. (2000). Principles of neural science (4th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, D. P. (1991). Curriculum options for the developmentally advanced. Exceptionality Education Canada, 1, 53–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, D. P. (in press). Developmental science and giftedness: An integrated life-span perspective. In F. D. Horowitz, R. F. Subotnik, & D. J. Matthews (Eds.), Developmental approaches to giftedness. Washington: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschenbaum, R. J., Armstrong, D. C., & Landrum, M. S. (1999). Resource consultation model in gifted education to support talent development in today’s inclusive schools. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landrum, M. (2001). Resource consultation and collaboration in gifted education. Psychology in the Schools, 38(5), 457–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. (2005, February 17). Concern spreads on gifted programs. New York Sun (p.6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtman, M. (2006). Qualitative research in education: A user’s guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohman, D. F. (2005). An aptitude perspective on talent: Implications for identification of academically gifted minority students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 333–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohman, D. F. (2006). Beliefs about differences between ability and accomplishment: From folk theories to cognitive science. Roeper Review, 29, 32–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London Gifted and Talented. (2006). London gifted and talented: Realizing our city’s potential. Retrieved August 30, 2006, from http://www.londongt.org/homepages/index.php

  • Matthews, D. J. (2004, November). Point/counterpoint. Are gifted programs good? Yes. New York Daily News.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, D. J., & Foster, J. (2005a). A dynamic scaffolding model of teacher development: The gifted education consultant as catalyst for change. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(3), 222–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, D. J., & Foster, J. F. (2005b). Being smart about gifted children: A guidebook for parents and educators. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, D. J., & Foster, J. F. (2006). Mystery to mastery: Shifting paradigms in gifted education. Roeper Review, 28(2), 64–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, D. J., Foster, J. F., Gladstone, D., Schieck, J., & Meiners, J. (2007). Supporting professionalism, diversity, and context within a Consultation, collaborative approach to gifted education. Journal of Educational and Psychological, 17, 315–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, D. J., & Keating, D. P. (1995). Domain specificity and habits of mind: An investigation of patterns of high-level development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 15, 319–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, D. J., & Kitchen, J. (2007a). Allowing idiosyncratic learners to thrive: Policy implications of a study of school-within-a-school gifted programs. Journal of School Choice, 1, 4, 27–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, D. J., & Kitchen, J. (2007b). School-within-a-school gifted programs: Perceptions of students and teachers in public secondary schools. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 3, 256–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association for Gifted Children. (2006). CEC-NAGC Initial knowledge and skill standards for gifted and talented education. Retrieved August 28, 2006, from http://www.nagc.org/uploadedFiles/Information_and_Resources/NCATE_standards/final%20initial%20standards%20(4.14.06).pdf

  • Nelson, C. A. (1999). Neural plasticity and human development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 42–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New York City Department of Education. (2006a). Gifted/talented & enrichment. Retrieved Augus t 19, 2006, from http://schools.nyc.gov/Offices/TeachLearn/OfficeCurriculumProfessionalDevelopment/GiftedTalented/default.htm

  • New York City Department of Education. (2006b). New York City Department of Education Continuum of Programs/Services for Gifted & Talented. Retrieved August 19, 2006, from http://schools.nyc.gov/Offices/TeachLearn/OfficeCurriculumProfessionalDevelopment/GiftedTalented/Programs/default.htm

  • New York State Education Department. (2003). New York State teacher certification examinations preparation guide gifted education content specialty test (64). Amherst MA: National Evaluation Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York State Education Department. (2005). Regulations of the commissioner of education: Registration of Curricula. Retrieved August 29, 2006, from http://www.highered.nysed.gov/tcert/part52.21.htm

  • Oreck, B. A., Owen, S. V., & Baum, S. M. (2003). Validity, reliability, and equity issues in an observational talent assessment process in the performing arts. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(1), 62–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., & Barab, S. A. (2005). The importance of contexts in theories of giftedness: Learning to embrace the messy joys of subjectivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 201–216). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse And Revival Of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C., & Becker, H. S. (1992). What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, S. M. (2005). Feminist perspectives on talent development. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp.217–245). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (2002). Expanding the conception of giftedness to include co-cognitive traits and to promote social capital. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(1), 33–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2003). The schoolwide enrichment model: Developing creative and productive giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp.184–203). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, R. (2004). Class and schools: Using social, economic and educational reform to close the black-white achievement gap. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, R. (2006, January). Review of Equity and excellence in American higher education, by William G. Bowen, Martin A. Kurzweil, & Eugene M. Tobin (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2005). Academe. Retrieved March 24, 2006, from http://www.epi.org/content.cfm/webfeatures_viewpoints_equity_and_excellence

  • Schwartz, R. (2005, January 13). Mike’s gift for kids: Finally, programs for city’s gifted get a deserved boost. New York Daily News.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shonkoff, J. P., & Phillips, D. A. (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Splitter, L. (2006). Philosophy in a crowded curriculum. In H. W. Kam (Ed.), Philosophy in schools: Developing a community of inquiry: Report on the proceedings of the conference (pp.56–65). Singapore: Singapore Teachers Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Splitter, L. (2007). Delving ever deeper: Gifted students and philosophy. Gifted Education International, 22(2/3), 207–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F., & Calderon, J. (2008). Developing giftedness and talent. In F. Karnes & K. Stephens (Eds.), Achieving excellence: Educating the gifted and talented (pp.49–61). Columbus, OH: Pearson Education Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F., & Jarvin, L. (2005). Beyond expertise: Conceptions of giftedness as great performance. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (3rd ed., 343–357). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Arnold, K. D. (2003). Beyond Bloom: Revisiting environmental factors that enhance or impede talent development. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp.227–238). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F., Worrell, F. C., & Matthews, D. J. (August, 2006). The development of giftedness and talent across the life-span. Symposium presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, A. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, A. J. (2003). Nature and nurture of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp.45–59). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanTassel-Baska, J. (2005). Gifted programs and services: What are the non-negotiables? Theory into practice, 44(2), 90–97. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanTassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2006). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westberg, K. L., Archambault, F. X., Dobyns, S. M., & Slavin, T. J. (1993). An observational study of instructional and curricular practices used with gifted and talented students. National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, A. (2006, August 25). Why we’re losing ground. New York Sun, p.9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrell, F. C. (2003). Why are there so few African Americans in gifted programs? In C. C Yeakey & R. D. Henderson (Eds.), Surmounting the odds: Education, opportunity, and society in the new millennium (pp.423–454). Greenwich, CT: Information Age, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrell, F. C. (in press). What does gifted mean? Personal and social identity perspectives on Giftedness in adolescence. In F. D. Horowitz, R. F. Subotnik, & D. J. Matthews (Eds.), The development of giftedness and talent: A life-span perspective. Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. City University of New York, New York, NY, USA

    Dona J. Matthews

Authors
  1. Dona J. Matthews
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Département des sciences administratives Pavillon Lucien-Brault, Université du Québec en Outaouais, 101, rue Saint-Jean-Bosco, Case postale 1250, succursale Hull, J8X 3X7, Gatineau, Québec, Canada

    Larisa V. Shavinina

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Matthews, D.J. (2009). How Do You Get to Carnegie Hall? Gifted Education in New York City. In: Shavinina, L.V. (eds) International Handbook on Giftedness. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_72

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation