Skip to main content

A Theory of Talent Development in Women of Accomplishment

  • Chapter
International Handbook on Giftedness

Abstract

Research on talented women who have achieved eminence in a variety of domains illustrates that no one formula leads to success. Some successful women marry and have children; some do not. Some work and live at high speed; others move more calmly through the world and achieve at similar or even higher levels. The current chapter draws from two decades of research pertaining to the lives of women who have successfully navigated the obstacles that often prevent high achievement in women, offering a new theory of female talent development. Issues explored include the spheres in which women express their talents, factors that may promote or inhibit the development of gifts, and gender differences in experiences that contribute to the unique nature of female achievement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 669.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ajzenberg-Selove, F. (1994). A matter of choices: Memoirs of a female physicist. Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antler, J. (1987). Lucy Sprague Mitchell. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, K. D. (1995). Lives of promise. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, K. D., Noble, K. D., & Subotnik, R. F. (1996). Remarkable women: Perspectives on female talent development. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J. (1997). Gender differences in the effects of anticipated evaluation of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 10(1), 25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, M. C. (1990). Composing a life. New York. Plume, The Penguin Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. J. (2001a). Managerial women’s career experiences, satisfaction, and well-being: A five country study. Cross-Cultural Management, 8(3/4), 117–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. J. (2001b). Women in management: Cross-cultural research. Cross-Cultural Management, 8(3/4), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, L. J. (2002). Talent development in female Olympians: A phenomenological approach. Unpublished dissertation: University of Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, C. M. (1979). The gifted and talented woman. In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and talented (pp. 401–423). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dash, J. (1973). A life of one’s own: Three gifted women and the men they married. New York: Paragon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dash, J. (1988). A life of one’s own. New York: Paragon House Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabor, A. (1995). Einstein’s wife: Work and marriage in the lives of five great twenty-first century women. New York: Viking/Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (2002). An introduction to Educational Research. (Seventh Edition). New York: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. E. (1996). The life space of a scientist: The visionary function and other aspects of Jean Piaget’s thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 9(2), 251-265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardwick, J. (1990). An immodest violet. London: Andre Deutsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helson, R. (1996). In search of the creative personality. Creativity Research Journal. 9(4), 295–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger, C. L., & Fleming, E. S. (1988). Gifted and talented young women: Antecedents and correlates of life satisfaction. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32(2), 254–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C. J. & McConnell, M. (2001). Generally speaking. New York: Warner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, B. A. (1985). Smart girls, gifted women. Columbus, OH: Ohio Psychology Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, B. A. (1994). Smart girls two: A new psychology of girls, women and giftedness. Dayton, OH: Ohio Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschenbaum, R. J. & Reis, S. M. (1997). Conflicts in creativity: Talented female artists. Creativity Research Journal, 10(2&3), pp. 251–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D., & Richards, W. (2003) Sex discrimination in UK academia. Gender, Work, and Organization, 10(2), 213–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, M. (2001). Women international managers: The European experience. Cross-Cultural Management, 8(3/4), 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List, K. & Renzulli, J. (1991). Creative women’s developmental patterns through age thirty-five. Gifted Education International, 7(3), 114–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational Researcher, 13(5), 20–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. B. (1976). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, S. M. (2005). Personal talent. High Ability Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D. L., & Burke, R. J. (eds.) (2002) Gender, work stress, and health. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochse, R. (1991). Why there were relatively few eminent women creators. Journal of Creative Behavior, 25(4), 334–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, A. N., & Russo, N. F. (1983). Models of achievement: Reflections of eminent women in psychology. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donovan-Polter, S. (2001). The scales of success: Constructions of life-career success of eminent men and women lawyers. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omar, A., & Davidson, M. J. (2001). Women in management: A comparative cross-cultural overview. Cross-Cultural Management, 8(3/4), 35–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, J. (1988). Private demons: The life of Shirley Jackson. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piirto, J. (1991). Why are there so few? (creative women: visual artists, mathematicians, musicians). Roeper Review, 13(3), 142–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis, S. M. (1987). We can’t change what we don’t recognize: Understanding the special needs of gifted females. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 83–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis, S. M. (1995). Talent ignored, talent diverted: The cultural context underlying giftedness in females. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 162–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis, S. M. (1996). Older women’s reflections on eminence: Obstacles, and opportunities. In K. D. Arnold, K. D. Noble, and R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Remarkable women: Perspectives on female talent development (pp. 149–168). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, S. M. (1998). Work left undone. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, S. M. (2001). Toward a theory of creativity in diverse creative women. In, M. Bloom, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Promoting creativity across the lifespan (pp. 231–275). Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, S. M. (2002). Toward a theory of creativity in diverse creative women. Creativity Research Journal, 14 (3 & 4), 305–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis, S. M. (2005). Feminist perspectives on talent development: A research based conception of giftedness in women. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness, Second Edition. Cambridge University Press: Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Re-examining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180–184, 261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53–92). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (2003). A conception of giftedness and its relationship to the development of social capital. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.) Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp, 75–87). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, T. (1991). Gender and the influence of evaluations on self- assessments in achievement settings. Psychological Bulletin,109(2), 297–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, T., & Nelson-Hoeksema, S. (1994). Gender comparisons in responsiveness to others’ evaluations in achievement settings. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 221–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe, A (1952). The making of a scientist. New York: Dodd Mead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roscher, N. (1987). Chemistry’s creative women. Journal of Chemical Education, 56(9), 748–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triarchic theory of intellectual giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 233–243). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1999). The theory of successful intelligence. Review of General Psychology. 3,292–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. & Gregorenko, E. L. (2002). The theory of successful intelligence as a basis for gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly. 46(4), 265–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. & Arnold, K. (1995). Passing through the gates: Career establishment of talented women scientists. Roeper Review, 13(3), 55–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2000). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (3rd edition). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, A. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, A. J. (1986). Giftedness: A psychosocial approach. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 21–52). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, A. J. (1991). The social psychology of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 27–44). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, C. M., & Paik, Y. (2001). Where do American women face their biggest obstacle to expatriate success? Back in their own backyard. Cross-Cultural Management, 8(3/4), 98–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varma, A., & Stroh, L. K. (2001). Different perspectives on selection for international assignments: The impact of LMX and gender. Cross-Cultural Management, 8(3/4), 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, T. & Walberg, H. (1995). Girls who became famous literalists of the imagination. Roeper Review, 13(3), 24–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, E. (2000). The door in the dream: Conversations with eminent women in science. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winstone, H. V. F. (1978). Gertrude Bell. New York: Quartet Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sally M. Reis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reis, S.M., Sullivan, E.E. (2009). A Theory of Talent Development in Women of Accomplishment. In: Shavinina, L.V. (eds) International Handbook on Giftedness. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics