Abstract
Research on talented women who have achieved eminence in a variety of domains illustrates that no one formula leads to success. Some successful women marry and have children; some do not. Some work and live at high speed; others move more calmly through the world and achieve at similar or even higher levels. The current chapter draws from two decades of research pertaining to the lives of women who have successfully navigated the obstacles that often prevent high achievement in women, offering a new theory of female talent development. Issues explored include the spheres in which women express their talents, factors that may promote or inhibit the development of gifts, and gender differences in experiences that contribute to the unique nature of female achievement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ajzenberg-Selove, F. (1994). A matter of choices: Memoirs of a female physicist. Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Antler, J. (1987). Lucy Sprague Mitchell. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Arnold, K. D. (1995). Lives of promise. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Arnold, K. D., Noble, K. D., & Subotnik, R. F. (1996). Remarkable women: Perspectives on female talent development. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Baer, J. (1997). Gender differences in the effects of anticipated evaluation of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 10(1), 25–31.
Bateson, M. C. (1990). Composing a life. New York. Plume, The Penguin Group.
Burke, R. J. (2001a). Managerial women’s career experiences, satisfaction, and well-being: A five country study. Cross-Cultural Management, 8(3/4), 117–133.
Burke, R. J. (2001b). Women in management: Cross-cultural research. Cross-Cultural Management, 8(3/4), 3–10.
Burton, L. J. (2002). Talent development in female Olympians: A phenomenological approach. Unpublished dissertation: University of Connecticut.
Callahan, C. M. (1979). The gifted and talented woman. In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and talented (pp. 401–423). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
Dash, J. (1973). A life of one’s own: Three gifted women and the men they married. New York: Paragon House.
Dash, J. (1988). A life of one’s own. New York: Paragon House Publishers.
Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Gabor, A. (1995). Einstein’s wife: Work and marriage in the lives of five great twenty-first century women. New York: Viking/Penguin.
Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (2002). An introduction to Educational Research. (Seventh Edition). New York: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gruber, H. E. (1996). The life space of a scientist: The visionary function and other aspects of Jean Piaget’s thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 9(2), 251-265.
Hardwick, J. (1990). An immodest violet. London: Andre Deutsch.
Helson, R. (1996). In search of the creative personality. Creativity Research Journal. 9(4), 295–306.
Hollinger, C. L., & Fleming, E. S. (1988). Gifted and talented young women: Antecedents and correlates of life satisfaction. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32(2), 254–260.
Kennedy, C. J. & McConnell, M. (2001). Generally speaking. New York: Warner Books.
Kerr, B. A. (1985). Smart girls, gifted women. Columbus, OH: Ohio Psychology Publishing Company.
Kerr, B. A. (1994). Smart girls two: A new psychology of girls, women and giftedness. Dayton, OH: Ohio Psychology Press.
Kirschenbaum, R. J. & Reis, S. M. (1997). Conflicts in creativity: Talented female artists. Creativity Research Journal, 10(2&3), pp. 251–263.
Knights, D., & Richards, W. (2003) Sex discrimination in UK academia. Gender, Work, and Organization, 10(2), 213–238.
Linehan, M. (2001). Women international managers: The European experience. Cross-Cultural Management, 8(3/4), 68–84.
List, K. & Renzulli, J. (1991). Creative women’s developmental patterns through age thirty-five. Gifted Education International, 7(3), 114–122.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational Researcher, 13(5), 20–30.
Miller, J. B. (1976). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon Press.
Moon, S. M. (2005). Personal talent. High Ability Studies.
Nelson, D. L., & Burke, R. J. (eds.) (2002) Gender, work stress, and health. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Ochse, R. (1991). Why there were relatively few eminent women creators. Journal of Creative Behavior, 25(4), 334–343.
O’Connell, A. N., & Russo, N. F. (1983). Models of achievement: Reflections of eminent women in psychology. New York: Columbia University Press.
O’Donovan-Polter, S. (2001). The scales of success: Constructions of life-career success of eminent men and women lawyers. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Omar, A., & Davidson, M. J. (2001). Women in management: A comparative cross-cultural overview. Cross-Cultural Management, 8(3/4), 35–67.
Oppenheimer, J. (1988). Private demons: The life of Shirley Jackson. New York: Ballantine Books.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Piirto, J. (1991). Why are there so few? (creative women: visual artists, mathematicians, musicians). Roeper Review, 13(3), 142–147.
Reis, S. M. (1987). We can’t change what we don’t recognize: Understanding the special needs of gifted females. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 83–88.
Reis, S. M. (1995). Talent ignored, talent diverted: The cultural context underlying giftedness in females. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 162–170.
Reis, S. M. (1996). Older women’s reflections on eminence: Obstacles, and opportunities. In K. D. Arnold, K. D. Noble, and R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Remarkable women: Perspectives on female talent development (pp. 149–168). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Reis, S. M. (1998). Work left undone. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
Reis, S. M. (2001). Toward a theory of creativity in diverse creative women. In, M. Bloom, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Promoting creativity across the lifespan (pp. 231–275). Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
Reis, S. M. (2002). Toward a theory of creativity in diverse creative women. Creativity Research Journal, 14 (3 & 4), 305–316.
Reis, S. M. (2005). Feminist perspectives on talent development: A research based conception of giftedness in women. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness, Second Edition. Cambridge University Press: Boston, MA.
Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Re-examining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180–184, 261.
Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53–92). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Renzulli, J. S. (2003). A conception of giftedness and its relationship to the development of social capital. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.) Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp, 75–87). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Roberts, T. (1991). Gender and the influence of evaluations on self- assessments in achievement settings. Psychological Bulletin,109(2), 297–308.
Roberts, T., & Nelson-Hoeksema, S. (1994). Gender comparisons in responsiveness to others’ evaluations in achievement settings. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 221–240.
Roe, A (1952). The making of a scientist. New York: Dodd Mead.
Roscher, N. (1987). Chemistry’s creative women. Journal of Chemical Education, 56(9), 748–752.
Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triarchic theory of intellectual giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 233–243). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1999). The theory of successful intelligence. Review of General Psychology. 3,292–316.
Sternberg, R. J. & Gregorenko, E. L. (2002). The theory of successful intelligence as a basis for gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly. 46(4), 265–277.
Subotnik, R. & Arnold, K. (1995). Passing through the gates: Career establishment of talented women scientists. Roeper Review, 13(3), 55–61.
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2000). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (3rd edition). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Tannenbaum, A. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. New York: Macmillan.
Tannenbaum, A. J. (1986). Giftedness: A psychosocial approach. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 21–52). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Tannenbaum, A. J. (1991). The social psychology of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 27–44). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Vance, C. M., & Paik, Y. (2001). Where do American women face their biggest obstacle to expatriate success? Back in their own backyard. Cross-Cultural Management, 8(3/4), 98–116.
Varma, A., & Stroh, L. K. (2001). Different perspectives on selection for international assignments: The impact of LMX and gender. Cross-Cultural Management, 8(3/4), 85–97.
Wallace, T. & Walberg, H. (1995). Girls who became famous literalists of the imagination. Roeper Review, 13(3), 24–27.
Wasserman, E. (2000). The door in the dream: Conversations with eminent women in science. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
Winstone, H. V. F. (1978). Gertrude Bell. New York: Quartet Press.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reis, S.M., Sullivan, E.E. (2009). A Theory of Talent Development in Women of Accomplishment. In: Shavinina, L.V. (eds) International Handbook on Giftedness. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6161-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6162-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)