Teaching and Learning with Analogies
As we have illustrated in this chapter, on balance analogies are a friend to teachers and students alike but as we emphasise, analogies can be double-edged swords. In order that analogies are used as an effective tool in a science teacher’s repertoire, knowledge about their pedagogical function is essential.
In its most elementary form, science teachers’ knowledge about analogies should include:
the suitability of the analog to the target for the student audience and the extent of teacher-directed or student-generated mapping needed to understand the target concept;
an understanding that an analogy does not provide learners with all facets of the target concept and that multiple analogies can better achieve this goal;
an appreciation that not all learners are comfortable with multiple analogies because the epistemological orientation of some is to expect a single explanation for a phenomenon.
Additional understanding of how analogies can be optimally used in class can be derived from the history of scientific discovery and from accounts of the ways experienced science teachers use analogies. We do not wish to claim that analogies used in science classrooms will necessarily improve both science teaching and learning. Still, research has compellingly demonstrated that, when used effectively, analogies are a valuable pedagogical tool in teachers’ repertoires and this enhancement of practice is our aim in writing this chapter.
- Atkins, P. (1995). The periodic kingdom. London: Phoenix.
- Bronowski, J. (1973). The ascent of man. London: British Broadcasting Corporation.
- Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, The MIT Press.
- Champagne, A. B., Gunstone, R. F., & Klopfer, L. E. (1985). Effecting changes in cognitive structures among physics students. In L. H. T. West, & A. L. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 163–188). Orlando, FA: Academic Press.
- Cosgrove, M. (1995). A case study of science-in-the-making as students generate an analogy for electricity. International Journal of Science Education, 17, 295–310.
- Curtis, R. V., & Reigeluth, C. M. (1984). The use of analogies in written text. Instructional Science, 13, 99–117. CrossRef
- Dagher, Z. R. (1995a). Does the use of analogies contribute to conceptual change? Science Education, 78, 601–614.
- Dagher, Z. R. (1995b). Analysis of analogies used by teachers. Journal of Research in Science Education, 32, 259–270.
- Dupin, J. J., & Johsua, S. (1989). Analogies and “modelling analogies” in teaching. Some examples in basic electricity. Science Education, 73, 207–224.
- Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75, 649–672.
- Feynman, R. P. (1994). Six easy pieces. Reading, MA: Helix Books.
- Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1–38. CrossRef
- Glynn, S. M. (1991). Explaining science concepts: A teaching-with-analogies model. In S. Glynn, R. Yeany and B. Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science (pp. 219–240). Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum.
- Harrison, A. (2001). How do teachers and textbook writers model scientific ideas for students? Research in Science Education, 31, 401–436. CrossRef
- Harrison A.G., & Treagust, D.F. (1993). Teaching with analogies: A case study in grade 10 optics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 1291–1307.
- Harrison, A.G., & Treagust, D.F. (2000). Learning about atoms, molecules and chemical bonds: a case-study of multiple model use in grade-11 chemistry. Science Education, 84, 352–381. CrossRef
- Harrison, A.G., & de Jong, O. (2004). Using multiple analogies: Case study of a chemistry teacher’s preparations, presentations and reflections. In the proceedings of European Science Education Research Association. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
- Hesse, M. B. (1963). Models and analogies in science. London: Seed and Ward.
- Hewitt. P. G. (1999). Conceptual physics, 3rd ed. Menlo Park, CA: Addison Wesley.
- Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Nersessian, N. (1992). Constructing and instructing: The role of “abstraction techniques” in creating and learning physics. In R. Duschl & R. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 48–68). NY: SUNY Press.
- Stocklmayer, S. M., & Treagust, D.F. (1996). Images of electricity: How do novices and experts model electric current? International Journal of Science Education, 18, 163–178.
- Treagust, D. F., Duit, R., Joslin, P., & Lindauer, I. (1992). Science teachers use of analogies: Observations from classroom practice. International Journal of Science Education, 14, 413–422.
- Treagust, D.F., & Harrison, A.G. (2000). In search of explanatory frameworks: An analysis of Richard Feynman’s lecture, ‘Atoms in motion’. International Journal of Science Education. 22, 1157–1170. CrossRef
- Treagust, D. F., Harrison, A. G., & Venville, G (1998). Teaching science effectively with analogies: An approach for pre-service and in-service teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 9(1), 85–101. CrossRef
- Thiele, R. B., & Treagust, D. F. (1994). An interpretive examination of high school chemistry teachers’ analogical explanations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 227–242.
- Wong, E. D. (1993). Self generated analogies as a tool for constructing and evaluating explanations of scientific phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 367–380.
- Zook, K. B. (1991). Effect of analogical processes on learning and misrepresentation. Educational Psychology Review, 3(1), 41–72. CrossRef
- Teaching and Learning with Analogies
- Book Title
- Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education
- pp 11-24
- Print ISBN
- Online ISBN
- Series Title
- Science & Technology Education Library
- Series Volume
- Series ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Copyright Holder
- Additional Links
- eBook Packages
- Editor Affiliations
- 11. University of Technology Sydney
- 12. Central Queensland University
- 13. Queensland University of Technology
- Author Affiliations
- 14. Central Queensland University, Australia
- 15. Curtin University of Technology, Australia
To view the rest of this content please follow the download PDF link above.