Abstract
Connecting science to students’ everyday life experiences is an important theme in science education discourse. The aim of this article is to explore in what ways ‘everyday life’ is used in the science classroom and what problems are solved through the use of ‘everyday life’. The research approach is ethnographic. Data was gathered through participant observation during one semester, in two Swedish science classes. Results show that ‘everyday life’ is brought into the classroom and made into school tasks within different types of activities; enculturation into science, education of scientifically literate citizens and making science interesting. The results underscore the importance of understanding the use of ‘everyday life’ in science classrooms as embedded in science classroom practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science Education: Border Crossings into the Subculture of Science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1–52.
Andersson, B. (2001). Elevers tänkande och skolans naturvetenskap. Forskningsresultat som ger nya idéer. Skolverket. Liber: Stockholm.
Beach, D. (1999). Alienation and Fetish in Science Education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 43(2), 157–172.
Bergqvist, K. & Säljö, R. (1994). Conceptually blindfolded in the optics lab. Dilemmas of inductive learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 9(2), 149–158.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher 18(1), 32–42.
Campbell, B. & Lubben, F. (2000). Learning science through contexts: helping pupils make sense of everyday situations. International Journal of Science Education, 22(3), 239–252.
Carlgren, I. (1999). Pedagogiska verksamheter som miljöerr för lärande. In I. Carlgren (Ed.), Miljöer för lärande. (pp. 9–28). Studentlitteratur: Lund.
Cobern, W. & Aikenhead, G. S. (1998). Cultural Aspects of Learning Science. In Fraser, B.J. & Tobin, K.G. (Eds.), The International handbook of Science Education. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.
Crawford, T., Kelly, G. & Brown, C. (2000). Ways of Knowing beyond Facts and Laws of Science: An Ethnographic Investigation of Student Engagement in Scientific Process. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(3), 237–258.
De Boer, G. (2000). Scientific Literacy: Another look at Its Historical and Contemporary Meanings and Its Relationship to Science Education Reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601.
Delamont, S., Beynon, J. & Atkinson, P. (1988). In the Beginning was the Bunsen: the foundations of secondary school science. Qualitative Studies in Education, 1(4), 315–328.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E. & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.
Ensign, J. (1997). Ritualizing Sacredness in Math: Profaneness in Language Arts and Social Studies. Urban Review, 29(4), 253–61.
Giachardi, D. (1994). Relevance and the accessibility: the role of science education. School Science Review, 75(273), 7–14.
Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine de Guyter: New York.
Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano-Lopez, P. & Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking Diversity: Hybridity and Hybrid Language Practices in the Third Space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(4), 286–303.
Harlen, W. (2002). Links to everyday life: the roots of scientific literacy. Primary Science Review 71, 8–10.
Jewitt, C. & Scott, P. (2002). Meaning making in science classrooms: a joint perspective drawing on multimodal and sociocultural theoretical approaches. Paper presented at ISCRAT, Language, action and communication in science education symposium.
Knain, E. (2003). Identity & genre literacy in high-school students’ experimental reports. Paper presented at the 4th ESERA Conference, Noordwijkerhout, the Netherlands.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice. Perspectives on activity and context. (pp. 3–32). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating Communities: Sociocultural Perspectives on Science Education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316.
López, A. (2000). Science Teaching’s quantum leap. The UNESCO Courier, May 2000, 13–15.
Ogborn, J., Kress, G., Martin, I. & McGillicuddy, K. (1996). Explaining Science in the Classroom. Open University Press: Buckingham/Philadelphia.
Roth, W.-M. (2003). Toward an Anthropology of Graphing. Semiotic and Activity-Theoretic Perspectives. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht/Boston/London.
Roth, W.-M. (1998). Designing communities. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht/Boston/London.
Szybek, P. (2002). Science Education — An Event Staged on Two Stages Simultaneously. Science & Education 11, 525–555.
Szybek, P. (1999). Staging Science. Some Aspects of the Production and Distribution of Science Knowledge. Doctoral Dissertation Lund University. Department of Education: Lund.
Säljö, R. & Wyndhamn, J. (1993). Solving everyday problems in the formal setting. An empirical study of the school as context for thought. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice. Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 327–342). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Wolcott, H. F. (1999). Ethnography: a way of seeing. Sage Publications: Walnut Creek/London/New Delhi.
Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming Qualitative Data. Description, Analysis, and Interpretation. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Andrée, M. (2005). Ways of Using ‘Everyday Life’ in the Science Classroom. In: Boersma, K., Goedhart, M., de Jong, O., Eijkelhof, H. (eds) Research and the Quality of Science Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3673-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3673-6_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3672-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3673-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawHistory (R0)