Conclusion
We have shown that metatheorizing is an integral part of theorizing in sociology. We have delineated four overarching philosophical frameworks within which sociological metatheorizing is practiced. Although positivists, hermeneuticists, and critical theorists would all study theory to gain a more profound understanding of it, to produce new theories, and to create new metatheories, there are differences among them in terms of their relative emphasis on the three specific types of metatheorizing (i.e., MK, Mp, and Mo) and the ways in which they would practice each. For example, while critical theorists would share these three goals, the accomplishment of each would be subordinated to the broader objective of transforming society.
While the first three philosophical approaches fit well with the three more specific types of metatheorizing, the same cannot be said about the fourth, postmodern approach. The three specific types all share a very modern orientation toward progress in understanding theory and metatheory. Postmodernists tend to reject the modern notion of progress in general, as well as in metatheoretical work. Postmodernists who study theory tend to have a very different sense of the objectives of such study. While it is possible to look at postmodern theory as a threat to modern forms of theorizing and metatheorizing, it is also possible to see it as offering an array of provocative new ideas that could be used by both. In our exposition we have adopted the latter view toward postmodern theory and see it as offering theorists and all types of metatheorists (and metatheorizing) a set of new ideas and tools that can be used in their work.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Antonio, R. J. (1991). Postmodern storytelling versus pragmatic truth-seeking: The discursive bases of social theory. Sociological Theory, 9, 154–163.
Barthes, R. (1977). Image-music-text. New York: Hill and Wang.
Bitzer, L. (1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1, 1–14.
Blalock, H. M., Jr. (1969). Theory construction: From verbal to mathematical formulation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bourdieu, P. (1971). Intellectual field and creative project. In M. E D. Young (Ed.), Knowledge and control (pp. 161–188). London: Collier-Macmillan.
Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (1989). Multimethod research: A synthesis of style. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Brown, R. H. (1992). Social science and society as discourse: Toward a sociology for civic competence. In S. Seidman & D. G. Wagner (Eds.), Postmodernism and social theory (pp. 223–243). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Calhoun, C. (1992). Culture, history, and the problem of specificity in social theory. In S. Seidman & D. G. Wagner (Eds.), Postmodernism and social theory (pp. 244–288). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Collins, R. (1986). Is 1980s sociology in the doldrums? American Journal of Sociology, 91, 1336–1355.
Comte, A. (1930/1942/1974). The positive philosophy. New York: AMS Press.
Connolly, W. E. (1973). Theoretical self-consciousness. Polity, 6, 5–36.
Cooper, H. M. (1984). The integrative research review: A systematic approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Derrida, J. (1974). Ofgrammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and difference. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
Diggins, J. P. (1999). Thorstein Veblen: Theorist of the leisure class. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dubin, R. (1969). Theory building. New York: The Free Press.
Eckberg, D. L., & Hill, L., Jr. (1979). The paradigm concept and sociology: A critical review. American Sociological Review, 44, 925–937.
Effrat, A. (1972). Power to the paradigms: An editorial introduction. Sociological Inquiry, 42, 3–33.
Fiske, D. W., & Schweder, R. A. (Eds.). (1986). Metatheory in social science: Pluralism and subjectivities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, M. (1969/1971/1976). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse of language. New York: Harper Colophon.
Foucault, M. (1966/1973). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage.
Freese, L. (Ed.). (1980). Theoretical methods in sociology. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Friedrichs, R. W. (1970). A sociology of sociology. New York: Free Press.
Fuhrman, E. R., & Snizek, W. (1990). Neither proscience nor antiscience: Metasociology as dialogue. Sociological Forum, 5, 17–36.
Furfey, P. H. (1965). The scope and method of sociology: A metasociological treatise. New York: Cooper Square.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and method. New York: Seabury Press.
Gibbs, J. P. (1972). Sociological theory construction. Hinsdale, IL: The Dryden Press.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Giddens, A. (1987). Social theory and modern sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Genosko, G. (1994). Baudrillard and signs: Signification ablaze. London: Routledge.
Gouldner, A. (1965). Enter Plato: Classical Greece and the origins of social theory. New York: Basic Books.
Gouldner, A. (1970). The coming crisis of Western sociology. New York: Basic Books.
Hage, J. (1972). Techniques and problems of theory construction in sociology. New York: Wiley.
Hage, J. (Ed.). (1994). Formal theory in sociology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Hedstrom, P., & Swedberg, R. (Eds.). (1998). Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hoecker-Drysdale, S. (2000). Harriet Martineau. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to major social theorists (pp. 53–80). Oxford, England and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Hoy, D. C. (1978). The critical circle. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hoy, D. C. (1985). Jacques Derrida. In Q. Skinner (Ed.), The return of grand theory in the human sciences (pp. 43–64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huaco, G. (1986). Ideology and general theory: The case of sociological functionalism. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 28, 34–54.
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F L. (1989). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Kuhn, T. (1962/1970). The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lemert, C. (2000). Charlotte Perkins Gilman. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to major social theorists (pp. 279–301). Oxford, England and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Lengermann, P. M., & Niebrugge-Brantley, J. (Eds.). (1998). The women founders: Sociology and social theory, 1830–1930. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Levine, D. N. (1995). Visions of the sociological tradition. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Lzotard, J.-F. (1989). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
McMullin, E. (1970). The history and philosophy of science: A taxonomy. In R. H. Stuewer (Ed.), Historical and philosophical perspectives of science (pp. 12–67). Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.
Merton, R. K. (1949/1957/1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
Mitzman, A. (1969). The iron cage: An historical interpretation of Max Weber. New York: Grosset and Dunlap.
Mowitt, J. (1992). Text: The genealogy of an antidisciplinary object. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press.
Mullins, N. C. (1971). The art of theory construction and use. New York: Harper & Row.
Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Osterberg, D. (1988). Metasociology: An inquiry into the origins and validity of social thought. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian University Press.
Parsons, T. (1937). The structure of social action. New York: McGraw Hill.
Parsons, T. (1979/1980). On theory and metatheory. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 7, 5–16.
Radnitzky, G. (1973). Contemporary schools of metascience. Chicago: Henry Regnery.
Reynolds, P. D. (1971). A primer in theory construction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Ritzer, G. (1975). Sociology: A multiple paradigm science. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Ritzer, G. (1981). Toward an integrated sociological paradigm: The search for an exemplar and an image of the subject matter. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Ritzer, G. (1988). Sociological metatheory: A defense of a subfield by a delineation of its parameters. Sociological Theory, 6, 187–200.
Ritzer, G. (1990). Symposium: Metatheory: Its uses and abuses in contemporary sociology. Sociological Forum, 5, 1–74.
Ritzer, G. (1991a). Recent explorations in sociological metatheorizing. Sociological Perspectives, 34, 237–390.
Ritzer, G. (1991b). Metatheorizing in sociology. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Ritzer, G. (Ed.). (1992). Metatheorizing. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ritzer, G. (Ed.). (2000). The Blackwell companion to major social theorists. Oxford, England and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Ritzer, G., Wiedenhoft, W., & Murphy, J. (2001). Thorstein Veblen in the age of hyperconsumption. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Fast food, credit cards and the cathedrals of consumption: Explorations in the sociology of consumption (pp. 203–221). London: Sage.
Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rule, J. B. (1994). Dilemmas of theoretical progress. Sociological Forum, 9, 241–257.
Seidman, S. (1991). The end of sociological theory: The postmodern hope. Sociological Theory, 9, 131–146.
Skocpol, T. (1986). The dead end of metatheory. Contemporary Sociology, 16, 10–12.
Sorokin, P (1928). Contemporary sociological theories. New York: Harper Brothers.
Spivak, G. (1974). Translator’s preface. In J. Derrida, Ofgrammatology (pp. ix–lxxxvii). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1968). Constructing social theory. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Sturrock, J. (1979). Roland Barthes. In J. Sturrock, Structuralism and since (pp. 52–80). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Swartz, D. (1997). Culture and power: The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Taylor, C. (1985). Philosophy and the human sciences: Philosophical papers 2. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tiryakian, E. (1979). The significance of schools in the development of sociology. In W. Snizek, E. Fuhrman, & M. K. Miller (Eds.), Contemporary issues in theory and research (pp. 211–233). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Tiryakian, E. (1986). Hegemonic schools and the development of sociology: Rethinking the history of the discipline. In R. C. Monk (Ed.), Structures of knowing (pp. 417–441). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Turner, J. (Ed.). (1989). Theory building in sociology: Assessing theoretical cumulation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Turner, J. (1991). The structure of sociological theory, 5th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Turner, S. P., & Turner, J. H. (1990). The impossible science: An institutional analysis of American sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Wacquant, L. J. D. (1996). Toward a reflexive sociology: A workshop with Pierre Bourdieu. In S. P. Turner (Ed.), Social theory and sociology: The classics and beyond (pp. 213–228). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Wagner, D. G. (1984). The growth of sociological theories. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Wallace, W. (1988). Toward a disciplinary matrix in sociology. In N. Smelser (Ed.), Handbook of sociology (pp. 1–59). Chicago: Aldive.
Weber, M. (1904–1905/1958). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. NY: Scribner’s.
Weber, M. (1921/1968). Economy and society. Totowa, NJ: Bedminster Press.
Weber, M. (1896–1906/1976). The agrarian sociology of ancient civilizations. London: New Left Books.
Weinstein, D., & Weinstein, M. A. (1992). The postmodern discourse of metatheory. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Metatheorizing (pp. 135–150). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
White, H. (1978). Tropics of discourse. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Willer, D. (1967). Scientific sociology: Theory and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Wolf, F. M. (1986). Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Zetterberg, H. L. (1954/1963/1965). On theory and verification in sociology. Totowa, NJ: The Bedminster Press.
Zhao, S. (1996). The beginning of the end or the end of the beginning? The theory construction movement revisited. Sociological Forum, 11, 305–318.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ritzer, G., Zhao, S., Murphy, J. (2001). Metatheorizing in Sociology: The Basic Parameters and the Potential Contributions of Postmodernism. In: Turner, J.H. (eds) Handbook of Sociological Theory. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36274-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36274-6_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-32458-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-36274-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive