- Ralph H. Turner
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$29.95 / €24.95 / £19.95*
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Networks of social roles constitute frameworks into which activities in society, organizations, and groups are organized and acquire meaning and by which individuals organize and understand the meaning of their own behavior and the actions of others. According to interactional role theory, roles are cultural resources but are typically vague, though people act as if they were real and relatively precise. Roles are continuously constructed and reconstructed as individuals engage in role-making in the course of interaction with incumbents of alter roles, or as legitimate role definers specify and respecify the organization of activity. When role definitions become ossified through formal organizational definition or strongly normative cultural tradition, or are too vague or internally or externally conflicting to supply a basis for action, the continuous process of role redefinition leads to the development of informal or working roles that deviate in significant ways from the formally recognized role definitions.
The dynamic reconstruction and role-making and the resolution of role conflicts are governed by three principles of functionality, representationality, and tenability. Roles are constantly modified for greater apparent effectiveness (functionality), limited by the understandings and misunderstandings of incumbents and legitimate role definers. Roles become vehicles for conveying certain images (representationality) and are framed and reframed in relation to what they are seen to represent. Roles are subject to continuous tension to supply a tenable balance of benefits to costs for role incumbents, limited by the power and resources of those incumbents.
- Allen, V. L., & van de Vliert, E. (Eds.). (1982). Role transitions: Explorations and explanations. New York: Plenum Press.
- Ambrose, S. E. (1997). Citizen soldiers: The U.S. Army from the Normandy beaches to the Bulge to the surrender of Germany. New York: Simon and Schuster.
- Bales, R. F. (1953). The equilibrium problem in small groups. In T. Parsons & R. E Bales (Eds.), Working papers in the theory of action (pp. 111–116). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
- Bales, R. E, & Slater, P. E. (1955). Role differentiation in small decision-making groups. In T. Parsons & R. E Bales (Eds.), Family, socialization, and interaction process (pp. 259–306). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
- Banton, M. (1965). Roles: An introduction to the study of social relations. New York: Basic Books.
- Barker, T. (1977). Peer group support for police occupational deviance. Criminology, 15, 353–366. CrossRef
- Benne, K. D., & Sheats, P. (1948). Functional roles of group members. Journal of Social Issues, 4, 41–49. CrossRef
- Biddle, B. J. (1979). Role theory: Expectations, identities, and behavior. New York: Academic Press.
- Burke, P J. (1968). Role differentiation and the legitimation of task activity. Sociometry, 31, 404–411. CrossRef
- Coser, R. L. (1991). In defense of modernity: Role complexity and individual autonomy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Dahrendorf, R. (1973). Homo sociologicus. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
- Davis, E (1961). Deviance disavowal: The management of strained interaction by the visibly handicapped. Social Problems, 9, 120–32.
- Davis, K. (1949). Human society. New York: Macmillan
- Ebaugh, H. R. F. (1988). Becoming an ex: The process of role exit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
- Goode, W. J. (1960). A theory of role strain. American Sociological Review, 25, 483–496. CrossRef
- Gordon, G. (1966). Role theory and illness: A sociological perspective. New Haven, CT: College and University Press.
- Gross, E. (1953). Some functional consequences of primary controls in formal work organizations. American Sociological Review, 18, 368–73. CrossRef
- Gross, N., Mason, W. S., & MacEachern, A. W. (1958). Explorations in role analysis: Studies of the school superintendency role. New York: Wiley.
- Hage, J., & Powers, C. H. (1992). Post-industrial lives: Roles and relationships in the 21st century. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
- Hogan, R. R. (1984). The stress role. Sociological Quarterly, 25, 567–579. CrossRef
- Hughes, E. C. (1937). Institutional office and the person. American Journal of Sociology, 43, 404–413. CrossRef
- Kronus, C. L. (1987). The evolution of occupational power: An historical study of task boundaries between physicians and pharmacists. Sociology of Work and Occupations, 3, 3–37.
- Lemert, E. M. (1951). Social pathology: A systematic approach to the theory of sociopathic behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Linton, R. (1936). The study of man: An introduction. New York: D. Appleton-Century.
- MacAndrew, C., & Edgerton, R. B. (1969). Drunken comportment: A social explanation. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
- Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Merton, R. M. (1957). The role set. British Journal of Sociology, 8, 106–120.
- Newcomb, T. M. (1950). Social psychology. New York: Henry Holt.
- Park, R. E. (1928) Human migration and the marginal man. American Journal of Sociology, 33, 881–893. CrossRef
- Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
- Peter, L. J., & Hull, R.(1969). The Peter principle. New York: W. Morrow.
- Scott, R. A. (1969). The making of blind men. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
- Perry, S. E., Silber, E., & Block, D. (1956). The child and his family in disaster. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council
- Roethlisberger, E J., & Dickson, W. J. (1947). Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Sieber, S. (1974) Toward a theory of role accumulation. American Sociological Review, 39, 567–578. CrossRef
- Stryker, S. (1968). Identity salience and role performance. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 30, 558–564. CrossRef
- Thornton, R., & Nardi, P. M. (1975). The dynamics of role acquisition. American Journal of Sociology, 80, 870–885. CrossRef
- Turner, R H. (1947). The Navy disbursing officer as a bureaucrat. American Sociological Review, 12, 342–348. CrossRef
- Turner, R. H. (1962). Role taking: Process versus conformity. In A. Rose (Ed.), Human behavior and social processes (pp. 20–40). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
- Turner, R. H. (1972). Deviance avowal as neutralization of commitment. Social Problems, 19, 308–321.
- Turner, R. H. (1978). The role and the person. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 1–23. CrossRef
- Turner, R. H. (1990). Role change. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 87–110. CrossRef
- Turner, R. H., & Colomy, C. (1988). Role differentiation: Orienting principles. In E. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes: A research annual, Vol. 5 (pp. 1–27). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
- Turner, R. H., & Shosid, N. (1976). Ambiguity and interchangeability in role attribution. American Sociological Review, 41, 993–1006 CrossRef
- van Gennep, A. (1909). Les rites de passage. Paris: Ferme.
- Waller, W. (1930). The old love and the new: Divorce and readjustment. New York: Horace Liveright.
- Weinstein, E., & Deutschberger, P. (1963). Some dimensions of altercasting. Sociometry, 26, 454–466. CrossRef
- Whyte, W. F. (1955). Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian slum, enlarged ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Role Theory
- Book Title
- Handbook of Sociological Theory
- Book Part
- Part III
- pp 233-254
- Print ISBN
- Online ISBN
- Series Title
- Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research
- Series ISSN
- Springer US
- Copyright Holder
- Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
- Additional Links
- eBook Packages
To view the rest of this content please follow the download PDF link above.