Skip to main content

Late Merge as Lowering Movement in Minimalist Grammars

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8535))

Abstract

Minimalist grammars can be specified in terms of their derivation tree languages and a mapping from derivations to derived trees, each of which is definable in monadic second-order logic (MSO). It has been shown that the linguistically motivated operation Late Merge can push either component past the threshold of MSO-definability. However, Late Merge as used in the syntactic literature can be elegantly recast in terms of Lowering movement within the framework of Movement-generalized Minimalist grammars. As the latter are MSO-definable, the linguistically relevant fragment of Late Merge is too.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chomsky, N.: The Minimalist Program. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Fowlie, M.: Order and optionality: Minimalist grammars with adjunction. In: Proceedings of MOL 2013 (2013) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Frey, W., Gärtner, H.M.: On the treatment of scrambling and adjunction in minimalist grammars. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Formal Grammar (FGTrento), Trento, pp. 41–52 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gärtner, H.M., Michaelis, J.: A note on countercyclicity and minimalist grammars. In: Penn, G. (ed.) Proceedings of Formal Grammar 2003, pp. 95–109. CSLI-Online, Stanford (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Graf, T.: Locality and the complexity of minimalist derivation tree languages. In: de Groote, P., Nederhof, M.-J. (eds.) Formal Grammar 2010/2011. LNCS, vol. 7395, pp. 208–227. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Graf, T.: Movement-generalized minimalist grammars. In: Béchet, D., Dikovsky, A. (eds.) LACL 2012. LNCS, vol. 7351, pp. 58–73. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Graf, T.: Tree adjunction as minimalist lowering. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammars and Related Formalisms (TAG+11), pp. 19–27 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Graf, T.: Local and Transderivational Constraints in Syntax and Semantics. Ph.D. thesis, UCLA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harkema, H.: A characterization of minimalist languages. In: de Groote, P., Morrill, G., Retoré, C. (eds.) LACL 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2099, pp. 193–211. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Kobele, G.M.: On late adjunction in minimalist grammars (2010), slides for a talk given at MCFG+ 2010

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kobele, G.M.: Without remnant movement, MGs are context-free. In: Ebert, C., Jäger, G., Michaelis, J. (eds.) MOL 10/11. LNCS, vol. 6149, pp. 160–173. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Kobele, G.M.: Idioms and extended transducers. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammars and Related Formalisms (TAG+11), Paris, France, September 2012, pp. 153–161 (2012), http://www.aclweb.org/anthology-new/W/W12/W12-4618

  13. Kobele, G.M.: Importing montagovian dynamics into minimalism. In: Béchet, D., Dikovsky, A. (eds.) LACL 2012. LNCS, vol. 7351, pp. 103–118. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Kobele, G.M., Michaelis, J.: Disentangling notions of specifier impenetrability: Late adjunction, islands, and expressive power. In: Kanazawa, M., Kornai, A., Kracht, M., Seki, H. (eds.) MOL 12. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6878, pp. 126–142. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Kobele, G.M., Retoré, C., Salvati, S.: An automata-theoretic approach to minimalism. In: Rogers, J., Kepser, S. (eds.) Model Theoretic Syntax at 10, pp. 71–80 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lebeaux, D.: Language Acquisition and the Form of the Grammar. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Michaelis, J.: Transforming linear context-free rewriting systems into minimalist grammars. In: de Groote, P., Morrill, G., Retoré, C. (eds.) LACL 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2099, pp. 228–244. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Mönnich, U.: Grammar morphisms (2006), ms. University of Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mönnich, U.: Minimalist syntax, multiple regular tree grammars and direction preserving tree transductions. In: Rogers, J., Kepser, S. (eds.) Model Theoretic Syntax at 10, pp. 83–87 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mönnich, U.: A logical characterization of extended TAGs. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammars and Related Formalisms (TAG+11), Paris, France, pp. 37–45 (September 2012), http://www.aclweb.org/anthology-new/W/W12/W12-4605

  21. Nissenbaum, J.: Covert movement and parasitic gaps. Proceedings of North Eastern Linguistic Society 30 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ochi, M.: Multiple spell-out and PF adjacency. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society 29 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rogers, J.: A Descriptive Approach to Language-Theoretic Complexity. CSLI, Stanford (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Stabler, E.P.: Derivational minimalism. In: Retoré, C. (ed.) LACL 1996. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1328, pp. 68–95. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Stabler, E.P.: Computational perspectives on minimalism. In: Boeckx, C. (ed.) Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, pp. 617–643. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stabler, E.P.: Top-down recognizers for MCFGs and MGs. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics (2011) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stabler, E.P.: Bayesian, minimalist, incremental syntactic analysis. Topics in Cognitive Science 5, 611–633 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stepanov, A.: Late adjunction and minimalist phrase structure. Syntax 4, 94–125 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Takahashi, S., Hulsey, S.: Wholesale Late Merger: Beyond the A/Ā distinction. Linguistc Inquiry 40, 387–426 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Graf, T. (2014). Late Merge as Lowering Movement in Minimalist Grammars. In: Asher, N., Soloviev, S. (eds) Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics. LACL 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8535. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43742-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43742-1_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-43741-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-43742-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics