Skip to main content

Validity of Developmental Delay Screening Test; Using Latent Class Model

  • Conference paper
  • 1557 Accesses

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 261))

Abstract

The purpose of this study was measured and compared validity including sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive values using latent class analysis. Data were collected from 229 children from 3 to 5 years old in local nurseries whose parents agreed with the purpose of study. Especially this study, validity of each test was measured for three developmental screening tests after establishing the last one developmental screening test as a standard and utility of the four screening tests was calculated four two latent class model. When a child was included in the developmental delay class through a latent class analysis. Positive predictive values were 86%-54% in K-DIAL3, K-DDSTII, K-ASQ and K-CDI respectively and those of combination of two of them were 95%-78%. It was suggested that tests of children of two or more rather than one and shall be used to of developmental screening tests for detecting developmental delay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Glascoe, F.P., Foster, M., Wolraich, M.L.: An economic analysis of developmental detection methods. Pediatrics 99, 830–837 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sohn, W.K.: Exploration for the development of developmental screening test. Open Infant. Edu. Research 9, 81–100 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pepe, M.S., Jenes, H.: Insights into latent class analysis good diagnostic test performance. Biostatistics 8, 474–484 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Garrett, E.S., Eaton, W.W., Zeger, S.: Methods for evaluating the performance of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard: a latent class model approach. Stat. Med. 21, 1289–1307 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cho, G.S., Chun, B.Y., Lee, J.S.: Korean edition sensitivity and clearness, consent index of DIAL-3. Emotion Behaviors Obstacle Research 21, 25–46 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chun, B.Y., Cho, G.S., Lee, K.H., Lee, E.S., Im, J.T.: Feasibility research for standardization of (DIAL-3) of an infant development selection tool. Infant Edu. Research 24, 119–140 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chun, B.Y., Cho, G.S., Lee, K.H., Lee, E.S., Im, J.T.: K-DIAL3 guideline book. Special Education, Seoul (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shin, H.S., Kwon, B.S., Im, S.O.: Research on feasibility of Korean type Denver II test for danger children selection of development problem. Children Nursing J. 11, 316–321 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frenkenburg, W.K., Dodds, J., Archer, P., Shapiro, H., Bresnick, B.: The Denver II: A major revision and re-standardization of the Denver Developmental Screening Test. Pediatrics 89, 91–97 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Glascoe, F.P., Byrne, K.E., Ashford, L.G., Johnson, K.L., Chang, B., Strickland, B.: Accuracy of the Denver-II in developmental screening. Pediatrics 89, 1221–1225 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, J.M., Shin, H.S.: K-CDI children development test guideline book. Special Education, Seoul (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ieton, H.: Child Development Inventory Manual. Behavior Science system, Minneapolis (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huh, G.H., Moon, J.S., Chung, Y.R.: Preliminary research for standardization of Parents preparation infant & children development selection tool of ASQ. Special Educational Science Research 36, 275–296 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Huh, G.H., Squires, J., Lee, S.Y., Lee, J.S.: Guideline book to use K-ASQ. Seoul Welfare Hall for Persons with Disabilities, Seoul (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Glascoe, F.P., Squires, J.: Issues with the new developmental screening and surveillance policy statement. Pediatrics 119, 861–863 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McPhillips, M., Jordan-Black, J.A.: The effect of social disadvantage on motor development in young children: a comparative study. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 48, 1214–1222 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Palfrey, J.S., Singer, J.D., Walker, D.K., Butler, J.A.: Early identification of children’s special needs: a study in five metropolitan communities. J. Pediatr. 111, 651–659 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lee, SA., Park, CY., Lee, KS. (2011). Validity of Developmental Delay Screening Test; Using Latent Class Model. In: Kim, Th., et al. Grid and Distributed Computing. GDC 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 261. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27180-9_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27180-9_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27179-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27180-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics