Abstract
Expressing contractual agreements electronically potentially allows agents to automatically perform functions surrounding contract use: establishment, fulfilment, renegotiation etc. For such automation to be used for real business concerns, there needs to be a high level of trust in the agent-based system. While there has been much research on simulating trust between agents, there are areas where such trust is harder to establish. In particular, contract proposals may come from parties that an agent has had no prior interaction with and, in competitive business-to-business environments, little reputation information may be available. In human practice, trust in a proposed contract is determined in part from the content of the proposal itself, and the similarity of the content to that of prior contracts, executed to varying degrees of success. In this paper, we argue that such analysis is also appropriate in automated systems, and to provide it we need systems to record salient details of prior contract use and algorithms for assessing proposals on their content. We use provenance technology to provide the former and detail algorithms for measuring contract success and similarity for the latter, applying them to an aerospace case study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aerogility (2009), http://www.aerogility.com/
IST CONTRACT project (2009), http://www.ist-contract.org
Aha, D.W., Kibler, D., Albert, M.K.: Instance-based learning algorithms. Machine Learning 6, 37–66 (1991)
Boella, G., van der Torre, L.W.N.: Regulative and constitutive norms in normative multiagent systems. In: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference (KR 2004), pp. 255–266 (2004)
Castelfranchi, C.: Prescribed mental attitudes in goal-adoption and norm-adoption. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7(1), 37–50 (1999)
Dignum, V., Meyer, J.J., Dignum, F., Weigand, H.: Formal specification of interaction in agent societies. In: Proceedings of the Second Goddard Workshop on Formal Approaches to Agent Based Systems, pp. 37–52 (2002)
Gambetta, D.: Can we trust trust? In: Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, pp. 213–237. Basil Blackwell, Malden (1988)
Gil, Y., Artz, D.: Towards content trust of web resources. Journal of Web Semantics 5(4), 227–239 (2007)
Governatori, G.: Representing business contracts in ruleml. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 14(2-3), 181–216 (2005)
Grossi, D.: Designing Invisible Handcuffs. PhD thesis, Dutch Research School for Information and Knowledge Systems (2007)
Guerin, F., Pitt, J.: Proving properties of open agent systems. In: The First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2002), pp. 557–558 (2002)
Jones, A.J.I., Sergot, M.: A formal characterisation of institutionalised power. Journal of the IGPL 3, 427–443 (1996)
Miles, S., Groth, P., Munroe, S., Moreau, L.: Prime: A methodology for developing provenance-aware applications. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (June 2009)
Moreau, L., Groth, P., Miles, S., Vazquez, J., Ibbotson, J., Jiang, S., Munroe, S., Rana, O., Schreiber, A., Tan, V., Varga, L.: The provenance of electronic data. Communications of the ACM 51(4), 52–58 (2008)
Moreau, L., Plale, B., Miles, S., Goble, C., Missier, P., Barga, R., Simmhan, Y., Futrelle, J., McGrath, R.E., Myers, J., Paulson, P., Bowers, S., Ludaescher, B., Kwasnikowska, N., Van den Bussche, J., Ellkvist, T., Freire, J., Groth, P.: Open Provenance Model (2009), http://openprovenance.org/
Oren, N., Panagiotidi, S., Vazquez-Salceda, J., Modgil, S., Luck, M., Miles, S.: Towards a formalisation of electronic contracting environments. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Coordination, Organization, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems at AAAI 2008, COIN 2008 (2008)
Panagiotidi, S., Alvarez, S., Vazquez, J., Oren, N., Ortega, S., Confalonieri, R., Jakob, M., Biba, J., Solanki, M., Willmott, S.: Contracting language syntax and semantics specification (2009), http://www.ist-contract.org
Ruohomaa, S., Kutvonen, L.: Trust management survey. In: Herrmann, P., Issarny, V., Shiu, S.C.K. (eds.) iTrust 2005. LNCS, vol. 3477, pp. 77–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Sabater, J., Sierra, C.: Review on computational trust and reputation models. Artificial Intelligence Review 24(1), 33–60 (2005)
Simmhan, Y., Plale, B., Gannon, D.: A survey of data provenance in e-science. SIGMOD Record 34(3), 31–36 (2005)
van der Torre, L., Tan, Y.: Contextual deontic logic. In: Bonzon, P., Cavalcanti, M., Nossum, R. (eds.) Formal Aspects of Context, pp. 143–160. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1997)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Groth, P., Miles, S., Modgil, S., Oren, N., Luck, M., Gil, Y. (2009). Determining the Trustworthiness of New Electronic Contracts. In: Aldewereld, H., Dignum, V., Picard, G. (eds) Engineering Societies in the Agents World X. ESAW 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5881. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10203-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10203-5_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-10202-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-10203-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)