Skip to main content

GOAL as a Planning Formalism

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5774))

Abstract

It has been observed that there are interesting relations between planning and agent programming. This is not surprising as agent programming was partially motivated by the lack of planners that are able to operate in dynamic, complex environments. Vice versa it has also been observed, however, that agent programming languages typically lack planning capabilities. We show in this paper that the agent programming language Goal is not only a programming language but can actually be used as a planning formalism as well. This opens up many possibilities for various approaches to mix execution and planning in agent-oriented programming. Moreover, by using the recently introduced temporal Goal we are able to include not only the stratified axioms and ADL that are part of PDDL but also plan constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Apt, K.R., Bol, R.: Logic programming and negation: A survey. Journal of Logic Programming 19, 9–71 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bacchus, F., Kabanza, F.: Using temporal logics to express search control knowledge for planning. Artificial Intelligence 16, 123–191 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Baier, J., McIlraith, S.: Planning with first-order temporally extended goals using heuristic search. In: Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2006), Boston, MA, July 2006, pp. 788–795 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bordini, R.H., Dastani, M., Dix, J., El Fallah Seghrouchni, A. (eds.): Multi-Agent Programming: Languages, Platforms and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cerrito, S., Mayer, M.C.: Using Linear Temporal Logic to Model and Solve Planning Problems. In: Giunchiglia, F. (ed.) AIMSA 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1480, pp. 141–152. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Intention Is Choice with Commitment. Artificial Intelligence 42, 213–261 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Emerson, E.A.: Temporal and Modal Mogic. In: van Leeuwen, J. (ed.) Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gerevini, A., Long, D.: Plan constraints and preferences in PDDL3. Technical report, Department of Electronics for Automation, University of Brescia (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hindriks, K.V.: Modules as Policy-Based Intentions. In: Dastani, M.M., El Fallah Seghrouchni, A., Ricci, A., Winikoff, M. (eds.) ProMAS 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4908, pp. 156–171. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Hindriks, K.V., van Riemsdijk, M.B., van der Hoek, W.: Agent programming with temporally extended goals. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mayer, M.C., Limongelli, C., Orlandini, A., Poggioni, V.: Linear temporal logic as an executable semantics for planning languages. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pednault, E.P.D.: ADL and the State-Transition Model of Action. Journal of Logic and Computation 4(5), 467–512 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Röger, G., Helmert, M., Nebel, B.: On the Relative Expressiveness of ADL and Golog. In: Proc. of the Eleventh Int. Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2008), pp. 544–550. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sardina, S., de Silva, L.P., Padgham, L.: Hierarchical planning in BDI agent programming languages. In: Proc. of the Fifth Int. Conference of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2006), pp. 1001–1008 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thiébaux, S., Hoffmann, J., Nebel, B.: In defense of PDDL axioms. Artificial Intelligence 168, 38–69 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hindriks, K.V., Roberti, T. (2009). GOAL as a Planning Formalism. In: Braubach, L., van der Hoek, W., Petta, P., Pokahr, A. (eds) Multiagent System Technologies. MATES 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5774. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04143-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04143-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04142-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04143-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics