Skip to main content

Automatic Checklist Generation for the Assessment of UML Models

  • Conference paper
Book cover Models in Software Engineering (MODELS 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5421))

Abstract

Assessing numerous models from students in written exams or homework is an exhausting task. We present an approach for a fair and transparent assessment of the completeness of models according to a natural language domain description. The assessment is based on checklists generated by the tool Sumo χ. Sumo χ directly works on an annotated version of the original exam text, so no ‘gold standard’ is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gelhausen, T., Tichy, W.F.: Thematic Role based Generation of UML Models from Real World Requirements. In: First IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC 2007), pp. 282–289 (September 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abbott, R.J.: Program Design by Informal English Descriptions. Communnications of the ACM 26(11), 882–894 (1983)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Moreno, A.M.: Object Oriented Analysis from Textual Specification. In: Ninth International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Madrid, Spain (June 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Landhäußer, M.: Sumo χSAL E -based UML MOdel eXamination (August 2008), http://www.ipd.uka.de/~gelhausen/sumox/

  5. Landhäußer, M.: Automatische Erzeugung von Prüflisten zur spezifikationsbezogenen Beurteilung der Vollständigkeit von UML-Modellen. Studienarbeit, Institute for Program Structures and Data Organization (IPD), University of Karlsruhe (July 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Parr, T.: ANTLR, http://www.antlr.org/

  7. Geiß, R., Batz, G.V., Grund, D., Hack, S., Szalkowski, A.: GrGen: A fast SPO-based graph rewriting tool. In: Corradini, A., Ehrig, H., Montanari, U., Ribeiro, L., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) ICGT 2006. LNCS, vol. 4178, pp. 383–397. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Howell, D.C.: Fundamental Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, 4th edn. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rupp, C.: Requirements and Psychology. IEEE Software 19(3), 16–18 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lange, C.F.J., DuBois, B., Chaudron, M.R.V., Demeyer, S.: An Experimental Investigation of UML Modeling Conventions. In: Nierstrasz, O., Whittle, J., Harel, D., Reggio, G. (eds.) MoDELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4199, pp. 27–41. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Lange, C.F.J., Chaudron, M.R.V.: Managing Model Quality in UML-Based Software Development. In: Chaudron, M.R.V. (ed.) Proc. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice, pp. 7–16 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lange, C.F.J., Chaudron, M.R.V.: Effects of Defects in UML models: An Experimental Investigation. In: ICSE 2006: Proceeding of the 28th international conference on Software engineering, pp. 401–411. ACM, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lange, C.F.J., Chaudron, M.R.V.: An Empirical Assessment of Completedness in UML Designs. In: EASE 2004: Proceedings of the 8th Internation Conference on Empirical Assessment in Software Engineering, vol. 920, pp. 111–119 (May 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mohagheghi, P., Aagedal, J.: Evaluating Quality in Model-Driven Engineering. In: MISE 2007: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Modeling in Software Engineering, p. 6. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lange, C.F.J., Chaudron, M.R.V., Muskens, J.: In Practice: UML Software Architecture and Design Description. IEEE Software 23(2), 40–46 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Briand, L.C., Hove, S.E., Labiche, Y., Arisholm, E.: Guiding the Application of Design Patterns Based on UML Models. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM), Philadelphia, USA, pp. 234–243 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kim, H., Boldyreff, C.: Developing Software Metrics Applicable to UML Models. In: Proceedings of QAOOSE 2002 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. McQuillan, J.A., Power, J.F.: On the Application of Software Metrics to UML Models. In: Kühne, T. (ed.) MoDELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4364, pp. 217–226. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gelhausen, T., Landhäußer, M., Körner, S.J. (2009). Automatic Checklist Generation for the Assessment of UML Models. In: Chaudron, M.R.V. (eds) Models in Software Engineering. MODELS 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5421. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01648-6_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01648-6_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01647-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01648-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics