Skip to main content

Modeling Social Deviance in Artificial Agent Societies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Multi-Agent Systems and Agreement Technologies (EUMAS 2015, AT 2015)

Abstract

Rule-governed artificial agent societies consisting of autonomous members are susceptible to rule violations, which can be seen as the acts of agents exercising their autonomy. As a consequence, modeling and allowing deviance is relevant, in particular, when artificial agent societies are used as the basis for agent-based social simulation. This work proposes a belief framework for modeling social deviance in artificial agent societies by taking into account both endogenous and exogenous factors contributing to rule compliance. The objective of the belief framework is to support the simulation of social environments where agents are susceptible to adopt rule-breaking behaviors. In this work, endogenous, exogenous and hybrid decision models supported by the event calculus formalism were implemented in an agent-based simulation model. Finally, a series of simulations was conducted in order to perform a sensitivity analysis of the agent-based simulation model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Artikis, A., Pitt, J., Sergot, M.: Animated specifications of computational societies. In: International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: Part 3, pp. 1053–1061. ACM Press (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Artikis, A., Sergot, M., Pitt, J.: Specifying norm-governed computational societies. ACM Trans. Comput. Logic 10(1), 1 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Asch, S.E.: Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgements. In: Guetzkow, H. (ed.) Groups, Leadership, and Men, pp. 222–236. Carnegie Press, Pittsburgh (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boella, G., Van der Torre, L.: Fulfilling or violating obligations in normative multiagent systems. In: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, pp. 483–486. IEEE Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cialdini, R.B., Kallgren, C.A., Reno, R.R.: A focus theory of normative conduct: a theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 24(20), 1–243 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davidsson, P.: Agent based social simulation: a computer science view. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 5(1) (2002). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/5/1/7.html. Accessed 28 March 2016

  7. Deguchi, T.: A simulation of rule-breaking behavior in public places. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 32(4), 439–452 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dignum, V., Dignum, F.P.: Modelling agent societies: co-ordination frameworks and institutions. In: Brazdil, P.B., Jorge, A.M. (eds.) EPIA 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2258, pp. 191–204. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Freeman, J., McMaster, M., Rakotonirainy, A.: An exploration into younger and older pedestrians’ risky behaviours at train level crossings. Safety 1(1), 16–27 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gerber, C.: An artificial agent society is more than a collection of “social” agents. Technical report, AAAI Fall Symposium (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gutierrez-Garcia, J.O., Rodríguez, L.F.: Corruptible social agents. Comput. Anim. Virtual Worlds (2014). doi:10.1002/cav.1613

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hammond, R.: Endogenous transition dynamics in corruption: an agent-based computer model. Working paper no. 19, Center on Social and Economic Dynamics, pp. 1–18 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Riveret, R., Rotolo, A., Sartor, G.: Probabilistic rule-based argumentation for norm-governed learning agents. Artif. Intell. Law 20(4), 383–420 (2012)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Sabater, J., Sierra, C.: Review on computational trust and reputation models. Artif. Intell. Rev. 24(1), 33–60 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Situngkir, H., Khanafiah, D.: Theorizing corruption through agent-based modeling. In: Joint International Conference on Information Sciences, pp. 1–4. Atlantis Press, Paris (2006). doi:10.2991/jcis.2006.183

  16. van der Torre, L.: Contextual deontic logic: normative agents, violations and independence. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 37(1–2), 33–63 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilensky, U.: NetLogo. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL (1999). http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author acknowledges the support provided by Asociación Mexicana de Cultura, A.C. and CONACYT under grant 216101. The second author wishes to thank UVM Laureate International Universities for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Octavio Gutierrez-Garcia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gutierrez-Garcia, J.O., Lopez-Neri, E. (2016). Modeling Social Deviance in Artificial Agent Societies. In: Rovatsos, M., Vouros, G., Julian, V. (eds) Multi-Agent Systems and Agreement Technologies. EUMAS AT 2015 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9571. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33509-4_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33509-4_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33508-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33509-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics