Skip to main content

Strong LP Formulations for Scheduling Splittable Jobs on Unrelated Machines

  • Conference paper
Book cover Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization (IPCO 2014)

Abstract

We study a natural generalization of the problem of minimizing makespan on unrelated machines in which jobs may be split into parts. The different parts of a job can be (simultaneously) processed on different machines, but each part requires a setup time before it can be processed. First we show that a natural adaptation of the seminal approximation algorithm for unrelated machine scheduling [11] yields a 3-approximation algorithm, equal to the integrality gap of the corresponding LP relaxation. Through a stronger LP relaxation, obtained by applying a lift-and-project procedure, we are able to improve both the integrality gap and the implied approximation factor to 1 + φ, where φ ≈ 1.618 is the golden ratio. This ratio decreases to 2 in the restricted assignment setting, matching the result for the classic version. Interestingly, we show that our problem cannot be approximated within a factor better than \(\frac{e}{e-1}\approx 1.582\) (unless \(\mathcal{P}=\mathcal{NP}\)). This provides some evidence that it is harder than the classic version, which is only known to be inapproximable within a factor 1.5 − ε. Since our 1 + φ bound remains tight when considering the seemingly stronger machine configuration LP, we propose a new job based configuration LP that has an infinite number of variables, one for each possible way a job may be split and processed on the machines. Using convex duality we show that this infinite LP has a finite representation and can be solved in polynomial time to any accuracy, rendering it a promising relaxation for obtaining better algorithms.

This work was partially supported by Nucleo Milenio Información y Coordinación en Redes ICM/FIC P10-024F, by EU-IRSES grant EUSACOU, by the DFG Priority Programme ”Algorithm Engineering” (SPP 1307), by the Berlin Mathematical School, by ERC Starting Grant 335288-OptApprox, and by FONDECYT project 3130407.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allahverdi, A., Ng, C., Cheng, T., Kovalyov, M.: A survey of scheduling problems with setup times or costs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 187, 985–1032 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Asadpour, A., Feige, U., Saberi, A.: Santa claus meets hypergraph matchings. ACM Trans. Algorithms 24, 24:1–24:9 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bansal, N., Sviridenko, M.: The Santa Claus problem. In: STOC, pp. 31–40 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, B., Ye, Y., Zhang, J.: Lot-sizing scheduling with batch setup times. J. Sched. 9, 299–310 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Correa, J.R., Verdugo, V., Verschae, J.: Approximation algorithms for scheduling splitting jobs with setup times. In: Talk in MAPSP (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ebenlendr, T., Krčál, M., Sgall, J.: Graph balancing: A special case of scheduling unrelated parallel machines. Algorithmica (2012), doi:10.1007/s00453-012-9668-9

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feige, U.: On allocations that maximize fairness. In: SODA, pp. 287–293 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Graham, R., Lawler, E., Lenstra, J., Kan, A.: Optimization and approximation in deterministic sequencing and scheduling: a survey. Ann. Discrete Math. 5, 287–326 (1979)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Haeupler, B., Saha, B., Srinivasan, A.: New constructive aspects of the Lovász Local Lemma. J. ACM 58, 28:1–28 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, D.-W., Na, D.-G., Frank Chen, F.: Unrelated parallel machine scheduling with setup times and a total weighted tardiness objective. Robot. Com. -Int. Manuf. 19, 173–181 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lenstra, J.K., Shmoys, D.B., Tardos, E.: Approximation algorithms for scheduling unrelated parallel machines. Math. Program. 46, 259–271 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, Z., Cheng, T.C.E.: Minimizing total completion time subject to job release dates and preemption penalties. J. Sched. 7, 313–327 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Lovász, L., Schrijver, A.: Cones of matrices and set-functions and 0-1 optimization. SIAM J. Optimiz. 1, 166–190 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Polacek, L., Svensson, O.: Quasi-polynomial local search for restricted max-min fair allocation. In: Czumaj, A., Mehlhorn, K., Pitts, A., Wattenhofer, R. (eds.) ICALP 2012, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7391, pp. 726–737. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Potts, C.N., Wassenhove, L.N.V.: Integrating scheduling with batching and lot-sizing: A review of algorithms and complexity. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 43, 395–406 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Schalekamp, F., Sitters, R., van der Ster, S., Stougie, L., Verdugo, V., van Zuylen, A.: Split scheduling with uniform setup times. Arxiv (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schuurman, P., Woeginger, G.J.: Preemptive scheduling with job-dependent setup times. In: SODA, pp. 759–767 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Serafini, P.: Scheduling jobs on several machines with the job splitting property. Oper. Res. 44, 617–628 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Svensson, O.: Santa claus schedules jobs on unrelated machines. SIAM J. Comput. 41, 1318–1341 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Sviridenko, M., Wiese, A.: Approximating the configuration-lp for minimizing weighted sum of completion times on unrelated machines. In: Goemans, M., Correa, J. (eds.) IPCO 2013. LNCS, vol. 7801, pp. 387–398. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. van der Ster, S.: The allocation of scarce resources in disaster relief. MSc-Thesis in Operations Research at VU University Amsterdam (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Verschae, J., Wiese, A.: On the configuration-LP for scheduling on unrelated machines. In: Demetrescu, C., Halldórsson, M.M. (eds.) ESA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6942, pp. 530–542. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Williamson, D.P., Shmoys, D.B.: The Design of Approximation Algorithms. Cambridge University Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Xing, W., Zhang, J.: Parallel machine scheduling with splitting jobs. Discrete Appl. Math. 103, 259–269 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Correa, J.R. et al. (2014). Strong LP Formulations for Scheduling Splittable Jobs on Unrelated Machines. In: Lee, J., Vygen, J. (eds) Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization. IPCO 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8494. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07557-0_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07557-0_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07556-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07557-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics