Skip to main content

Multi-level Governance and Natural Resource Management: The Challenges of Complexity, Diversity, and Uncertainty

  • Chapter

Abstract

Most human-environment interactions with regard to any natural resource occur on multiple scales. Furthermore, the “human” aspect of humanenvironment interactions always involves multiple communities of interest and identity, and the “environment” aspect always involves multiple dimensions, uses, and values of any natural resource. These facts pose a significant challenge in the design of institutions to aid in the sustainable management of those humanenvironment interactions. Literature addressing that challenge spreads across several disciplines, including resource economics, ecology, law, and political science. Any quest for the “right” scale of resource management institutions may end up being unsuccessful, but this does not mean there is no difference among institutional alternatives. Some arrangements offer more favorable conditions than others for information collection, deliberation, learning, and adaptation. This chapter provides arguments in support of the conclusion that polycentric arrangements operating (albeit imperfectly) in a number of settings improve human beings’ prospects for handling the challenges of complexity, diversity, and uncertainty and, therefore, enhance the possibilities for human societies to organize and maintain more nearly sustainable management of natural resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adger, W. N., Brown, K., & Tompkins, E. L. (2006). The political economy of cross-scale networks in resource co-management. Ecology and Society, 10, article 9, from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/art9/.

  • Barham, E. (2001). Ecological boundaries as community boundaries: The politics of watersheds. Society and Natural Resources, 14, 181–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (2006). From community-based resource management to complex systems: The scale issue and marine commons. Ecology and Society, 11, article 45, from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art45.

  • Berkes, F. (2007). Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 15188–15193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (Eds.) (2003). Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (Eds.). (1998). Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bish, R., & Ostrom, V. (1973). Understanding urban government. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatter, J., & Ingram, H. M. (2000). States, markets and beyond: Governance of transboundary water resources. Natural Resources Journal, 40, 439–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, R. A. (1996). Uncertainty in managing ecosystems sustainably. In J. Lemons (Ed.), Scientific uncertainty and environmental problem solving (pp. 118–159). London: Blackwell Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, D. (1989). Coordination without hierarchy: Informal structures in multiorganizational systems. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. H., Holling, C. S., & Light, St. S. (1995). Barriers broken and bridges built: A synthesis. In L. H. Gunderson, C. S. Holling, & St. S. Light (Eds.), Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions (pp. 489–532). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. H., Pritchard, Jr. L., Holling, C. S., Folke, C., & Peterson, G. D. (2002). A summary and synthesis of resilience in large-scale systems. In L. H. Gunderson & L. Pritchard, Jr. (Eds.), Resilience and the behavior of large-scale systems (pp. 249–266). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn, K. (2005, June). Integrative and segregative institutions. (Paper presented at the TransCoop workshop “Problems of polycentric governance in the growing EU”, Berlin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn, K., Arzt, K., & Peters, U. (2002). Institutional arrangements for environmental co-operatives: A conceptual framework. In K. Hagedorn (Ed.), Environmental cooperation and institutional change: Theories and policies for European agriculture (pp. 3–25). Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1978). Adaptive environmental assessment and management. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1986). Resilience of ecosystems, local surprise and global change. In W. Clark & R. E. Munn (Eds.), Sustainable development of the biosphere (pp. 297–317). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multilevel governance. American Political Science Review, 97, 233–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, M. A. (2002). Complexity and ecosystem management. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. D. (2001). Politics and the architecture of choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2005). The politics of attention: How government prioritizes problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, C. F., & Miller, C. (1996). Scientific uncertainty as a constraint to environmental problem solving: Large-scale ecosystems. In J. Lemons (Ed.), Scientific uncertainty and environmental problem solving (pp. 91–117). London: Blackwell Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knott, J., & Miller, G. (1987). Reforming bureaucracy: The politics of institutional choice. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korten, D. C. (1980). Community organization and rural development: A learning process approach. Public Administration Review, 40, 480–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, W. F. (2006). Foundations of a robust social-ecological system: Irrigation institutions in Taiwan. Journal of Institutional Economics, 2, 203–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebel, L., Garden, P., & Imamura, M. (2005). The politics of scale, position, and place in the governance of water resources in the Mekong region. Ecology and Society, 10, article 18, from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art18.

  • Lee, K. N. (1993). Compass and gyroscope: Integrating science and politics for the environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, B., Ostrom, E., Simon, & Wilson, J. (2003). Redundancy and diversity: Do they influence optimal management? In F. Berkes, J. Colding, & C. Folke (Eds.), Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change (pp. 83–114). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. (1992). Managerial dilemmas. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakerson, R. (1999). Understanding local public economies. San Francisco: ICS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1992). Crafting self-governing institutions for irrigation systems. San Francisco: ICS Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2007). A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 15181–15187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, V. (1989). The intellectual crisis in American public administration. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C. M., & Warren, R. (1961). The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. American Political Science Review, 55, 831–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe, E. (2001). Varieties of issue incompleteness and coordination: An example from ecosystem management. Policy Sciences, 34, 111–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semisovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlager, E., & Blomquist, W. (2008). Embracing watershed politics. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1957). Models of man. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (2000). Public administration in today’s world of organizations and markets. PS: Political Science and Politics, 33, 749–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, R. A., & Wiener, J. D. (2007). Water, adaptation, and property rights on the Snake and Klamath Rivers. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 43, 308–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (1988). Policy paradox and political reason. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swallow, B. M., Johnson, N. L., & Meinzen-Dick, R. S. (2001). Working with people for watershed management. Water Policy, 3, 449–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, S. -Y. (1994). Institutions and collective action: Self-governance in irrigation. San Francisco: ICS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (U.S. ACIR). (1987). The organization of local public economies (Report A-109). Washington, DC: U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C. (1986). Adaptive management of renewable resources. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther, P. (1987). Against idealistic beliefs in the problem-solving capacities of integrated resource management. Environmental Management, 11, 439–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, G. F. (1998). Reflections on the 50-year international search for integrated water management. Water Policy, 1, 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. (2002). Scientific uncertainty, complex systems and the design of common pool institutions. In E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. E. Dolsak, P. Stern, S. Stonich, & E. U. Weber (Eds.), Drama of the commons (pp. 327–359). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J., Low, B., Costanza, R., & Ostrom, E. (1999). Scale misperceptions and the spatial dynamics of a social-ecological system. Ecological Economics, 31, 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (1994). The problem of scale in human environment relationships. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6, 429–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (1995). The problem of scale in human environment relationships. In R. O. Keohane & E. Ostrom (Eds.), Local commons and global interdependence: Heterogeneity and cooperation in two domains (pp. 27–45). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (2002). The institutional dimensions of environmental change: Fit, interplay, and scale. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blomquist, W. (2009). Multi-level Governance and Natural Resource Management: The Challenges of Complexity, Diversity, and Uncertainty. In: Beckmann, V., Padmanabhan, M. (eds) Institutions and Sustainability. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9690-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics