Skip to main content

Religious Diversity and Education for Democratic Citizenship: The Contribution of the Council of Europe

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: International Handbooks of Religion and Education ((IHRE,volume 4))

Abstract

Issues about the study of religion in public education are being discussed internationally as never before. The discussions include not only specialists in religion but also many outside the professional field of religious education – politicians, civil servants, NGOs and other groups within civil society as well as educators concerned with fields such as citizenship and intercultural education. This is partly due to the global attention given to religion as a result of the events of September 11, 2001 in the United States, their causes, on-going consequences and associated incidents that have affected people in many parts of the world. In Europe, it also relates to the challenge of transcultural diversities (Robins, 2006) and the growing climate of racism in some states (MacEwen, 1995), much of it directed against Muslims, exacerbated by 9/11 and its consequences (Modood, Triandafyllidou, & Zapata-Barrero, 2006).

An earlier version of this chapter appeared as ‘European institutions and the contribution of studies of religious diversity to education for democratic citizenship’, in Jackson, Miedema, Weisse, & Willaime (2007, pp. 27–55).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   509.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.dalailama.com/ (accessed 15 January 2009).

  2. 2.

    For example, ‘Faith as Social Capital: Connecting or Dividing?’ Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2005. http://www.jrf.org.uk/bookshop/eBooks/9781861348388.pdf (accessed 19 January 2009).

  3. 3.

    http://www.coe.int/T/E/Cultural_Co-operation/education/E.D.C/ (accessed 15 May 2006).

  4. 4.

    Formed 31 years ago, IEA is a non-profit, private association which carries out international comparative studies on schools. Policy-makers and educators use data from IEA studies to assess the impact of alternative curricular offerings; monitor the quality of schooling worldwide; identify effective schools and learn how to improve their own educational systems, and better understand the instructional learning process.

  5. 5.

    For further information see: http://www.wam.umd.edu/~iea/ (accessed 19 January 2009).

  6. 6.

    Eurydice is a network of institutions collecting, monitoring, processing and circulating comparable information on education systems and policies across Europe. Eurydice was established in 1980 by the European Commission and member states as a strategic mechanism to foster co-operation, through improving understanding of educational systems and policies.

  7. 7.

    Downloadable from http://www.eurydice.org (accessed 19 January 2009).

  8. 8.

    For example, religion is mentioned in relation to social exclusion or discrimination (Belgium [Flemish]); diversity (Italy); understanding religious values (Denmark); strengthening values (Slovakia); understanding religions (Slovenia) and respecting each other’s religions (Bulgaria). Links between religious and citizenship education are seen through visits to neighbourhood or community groups including religious bodies. Some countries make no reference to religious education in their official documentation on citizenship education (e.g. Poland, Estonia, the Netherlands and Malta).

  9. 9.

    See also Kerr, 1999, 12f on distinguishing between education about, through and for citizenship.

  10. 10.

    The research was conducted under the auspices of the Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre), set up in 1993 to address the need for a systematic approach to the organisation and review of evidence-based work on social interventions. Both reports are published on EPPI-Centre’s website as part of The Research Evidence in Education Library (REEL) (http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/EPPIWeb /home.aspx?page=/reel/intro.htm accessed July 2006).

  11. 11.

    Following Gearon (2003), she points out that there was little or no UK research on citizenship education before the 1990s, but some research and writing in fields such as values education, character education and PSHE, and in fields operative since the 1970s, called collectively by Gearon ‘implicit citizenship education’ – peace education, global/world studies, human rights education and political education. In particular, there was very little research on practice at the school level and little attempt to integrate citizenship education into broader educational philosophies and practices.

  12. 12.

    Since this chapter was first published, highly important work in this field has been completed by the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights of the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe. I have written about the Toledo Guiding Principles on Teaching about Religions and Beliefs in Public Schools (OSCE, 2007) in Jackson (2008a).

  13. 13.

    http://europa.eu/constitution/en/ptoc1_en.htm#a1 (accessed 19 January 2009).

  14. 14.

    The International Seminar on Religious Education and Values (ISREV) was founded in 1978 and has met biennially since that time. Originally, it included western Europeans and north Americans. The membership is now much more international. See http://www.isrev.org/ (accessed 19 January 2009).

  15. 15.

    The driving figure behind the establishment of ENRECA was Prof. Hans-Günther Heimbrock. Heimbrock, Scheilke, and Schreiner (2001) is ENRECA’s first book; Miedema, Schreiner, Skeie, and Jackson (2004) explain the ENRECA’s goals; see also http://enreca.isert-network.com/docs/index.htm (accessed 1 June 2006). ENRECA now has its own European Book Series on ‘Religious Diversity and Education in Europe’, published from Germany by Waxmann. The first titles published were Zonne (2006) and Afdal (2006).

  16. 16.

    The International Network for Inter-religious and Inter-cultural Education was set up in 1994, soon after the election of a democratic government in South Africa, and had its first meeting at the University of Hamburg. The aim was to promote links between Southern African and Northern European research groups working in fields connecting religion and education in culturally diverse democratic societies. The seminar brought together Northern European and Southern African members of research and development groups working in the fields of religion, education and cultural diversity. Publications include Andree, Bakker, and Schreiner (1997); Chidester, Stonier, and Tobler (1999); Jackson (2003a); Weisse (1996) and contributions to a special issue of Scriptura: International Journal of Bible, Religion and Theology in South Africa, 89(2), 2005.

  17. 17.

    http://www.cogree.com/ (accessed 19 January 2009).

  18. 18.

    See http://www.iaie.org/ (accessed 19 January 2009).

  19. 19.

    The others are: the Directorate of Legal Affairs (DGI), the Directorate of Human Rights (DGII) and the Directorate of Social Cohesion (DGIII).

  20. 20.

    A general discussion of education policies within the Council of Europe is provided in Bîrzéa (2005).

  21. 21.

    http://www.coe.int/T/e/human_rights/ecri/5-Archives/2-Other_texts/2-Vienna_Summit/Declaration/Declaration_Vienna_Summit.asp (accessed 19 January 2009).

  22. 22.

    The policy review was piloted in South Eastern European countries and then applied in the Northern, Western, Southern, Central and Eastern regions. The results of these studies are published in Council of Europe (2004b), as is a synthesis of them.

  23. 23.

    Parliamentary Assembly, 4 October 2005 Recommendation 1720 (2005) http://assembly.coe.int/Main.asp?link=/Documents/AdoptedText/ta05/EREC1720.htm (accessed 19 January 2009).

  24. 24.

    The conclusion to the seminar report states that: ‘In the majority of Council of Europe member states the new generations do not even receive an education in their own religious heritage, much less that of others. For this reason, it had previously been suggested to establish an Institute capable of contributing to the development of teaching programmes, methods and materials in the member states. At the same time this Institute would serve as a research centre on these matters. It should also be a training centre for instructors, a meeting place and a forum for dialogue and exchange. Course content should be defined in close collaboration with representatives of the different religions traditionally present in Europe’ (Anon, 2006).

    Participants discussed the nature of such a centre (it should be independent, but organised within the structures of the Council of Europe), the kind of curriculum that might be taught there, the place that religious communities might have in a consultative role (the group envisaged an advisory body from the religious communities who could work with the Council of Europe), and the Centre’s organisation, management and staffing. For example, the group envisaged an advisory body from the religious communities who could work with the Council of Europe.

  25. 25.

    http://assembly.coe.int/Main.asp?link=/Documents/WorkingDocs/Doc06/EDOC10944.htm (accessed 19 January 2009).

  26. 26.

    The conference was held in Nizhniy Novgorod in the Russian Federation, September 7–9, 2006, under the auspices of the Ministry of Regional Development of the Russian Federation, the Inter-Faith Council of Russia and the Council of Europe. The quotation is from the ‘Volga Forum Declaration’, Final Document of the International Conference ‘Dialogue of Cultures and Inter-Faith Cooperation’, paragraph 4. http://www.strasbourg-reor.org/modules.php?name=News&new_topic=42&file=article&sid=352 http://www.coe.int/T/DC/Press/news/20060908_declaration_volga_en.asp (both accessed 19 January 2009).

  27. 27.

    The issue of faith-based religious education is a separate issue. One view expressed within the Council of Europe, based on human rights arguments, recognises the complementary nature of faith-based education (mainly in the private sphere) and a generic public education ‘about’ religion (McGrady, 2006).

  28. 28.

    http://www.strasbourg-reor.org/modules.php?name=News&new_topic=42&file=article&sid=352 http://www.coe.int/T/DC/Press/news/20060908_declaration_volga_en.asp (both accessed 19 January 2009).

  29. 29.

    http://https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1247647&Site=CM&BackColorInternet=9999CC&BackColorIntranet=FFBB55&BackColorLogged=FFAC75 (accessed 19 January 2009).

  30. 30.

    Moreover, the appreciation of religion as a ‘cultural fact’ should not inhibit the observation in classroom practice that many religious people believe their convictions to be true.

  31. 31.

    Eg Ban it! Daily Express, 21 October, 2006.

  32. 32.

    Research on the values of European youth also shows that most young people rate the value of personal autonomy highly (Kay & Ziebertz, 2006).

  33. 33.

    For example, Jackson 1997, 2004; Meijer, 1995, 2006; Ouellet, 2006; Skeie, 1995, 2006; Wright, 2006.

  34. 34.

    For example Jackson and Nesbitt 1993; Nesbitt, 2004, 2006; Østberg, 2003, 2006.

  35. 35.

    For example Ipgrave, 2003, 2005; Jackson, 1997, 2004, 2006; 2008b, 2008c; Leganger-Krogstad, 2000, 2001, 2003; O’Grady, 2003, 2005; Weisse, 2003.

  36. 36.

    See the view that exploration of fundamental questions also contributes to citizenship education (e.g. Ipgrave, 2003) and the view that religious education has much to offer considerations of global citizenship (Jackson, 2003b). Note also that some research conducted in the broad religious education field is highly relevant to the exploration of the relationship between religious and citizenship education at the conceptual level. Geir Afdal’s monumental study of ‘tolerance’ comes to mind (Afdal, 2006).

  37. 37.

    A ‘community of practice’ based at the University of Warwick (teachers and teacher training providers) has conducted action research studies in schools and teacher training institutes, developing interpretive and dialogical approaches using action research. This was done as part of the EC REDCo Project (Ipgrave, Jackson, & O’Grady, 2009).

  38. 38.

    There are also interesting developments in the Canadian province of Quebec that are very relevant to the European debate (see Milot, 2001; Ouellet, 2000, 2001, 2006).

References

  • Afdal, G. (2006). Tolerance and curriculum. Religious Diversity and Education in Europe series. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Assembly. (2000). Matters of faith: Religion in American public life. New York: American Assembly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andree, T., Bakker, C., & Schreiner, P. (Eds.). (1997). Crossing boundaries: Contributions to interreligious and intercultural education. Münster: Comenius Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon (2006) Unpublished ‘Conclusions’ following the seminar on ‘dialogue, tolerance and education: The concerted action of the Council of Europe and the religious communities’ Seminar organised by the Commissioner for Human Rights, Mr Alvaro Gil-Robles, Kazan, Russian Federation, 22–23 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audigier, F. (2000). Basic concepts and core competencies for education for democratic citizenship. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäckman, E., & Trafford, B. (2006). Democratic governance and educational institutions. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bîrzéa, C. (2005). Learning democracy: Education policies within the council of Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaylock, L. (2003). Why citizenship needs to take its spiritual and religious frontiers more seriously. Teaching Citizenship, Summer, 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, L., & Forrester, K. (2000). Sites of citizenship: Empowerment, participation and partnerships. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chidester, D., Stonier, J., & Tobler, J. (Eds.). (1999). Diversity as ethos: Challenges for interreligious and intercultural education. Cape Town: Institute for Comparative Religion in Southern Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, P. (2004). Children’s participation in ethnographic research: Issues of power and representation. Children and Society, 18, 165–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2002). Education for intercultural and interfaith dialogue: Proposal for a new project. unpublished working document prepared by the Secretariat, Educational Policies and European Dimension Division, Directorate of School, Out-of-School and Higher Education, Directorate General IV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (Ed.). (2004a). The religious dimension of intercultural education. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (Ed.). (2004b). All european study on education for democratic citizenship policies. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2004c). The council of Europe: 800 Million Europeans. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (Ed.). (2007). Religious diversity and intercultural education: A reference book for schools. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing (also available in French and Greek translation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2008a). ‘Recommendation CM/Rec(2008)12 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the dimension of religions and non-religious convictions within intercultural education’, available online at: http://https://wcd.coe.int//ViewDoc.jsp?Ref=CM/Rec(2008)12&Language=lanEnglish&Ver=original&BackColorInternet=DBDCF2&BackColorIntranet=FDC864&BackColorLogged=FDC864 (accessed 30 December 2009).

  • Council of Europe. (2008b). White paper on intercultural dialogue: ‘Living together as equals with dignity’. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Souza, M., Engebretson, K., Durka, G., Jackson, R., & McGrady, A., (Eds.). (2006). International Handbook of the religious, moral and spiritual dimensions of education. The Netherlands: Springer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin Crick, R. (2005). Citizenship education and the provision of schooling: A systematic review of evidence. International Journal of Citizenship and Teacher Education, 1(2), December, 56–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin Crick, R., Coates, M., Taylor, M., & Ritchie, S. (2004). A Systematic Review of the Impact of Citizenship Education on The Provision of Schooling. Research Evidence in Education Library (REEL) (London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education). http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/EPPIWeb/home.aspx?page=/reel/review_groups/citizenship/review_one.htm (accessed 19 January 2009)

  • Deakin Crick, R., Tew, M., Taylor, M., Durant, K., & Samuel, E. (2005). A Systematic Review of the Impact of Citizenship Education on Learning and Achievement. In: Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debray, R. (2002). L’Enseignment du Fait Religieux dans L’École Laïque: Rapport au Ministre de l’Éducation Nationale. Paris: Odile Jacob.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diez de Velasco, F. (2008). Religion, identity and education for peace: Beyond the dichotomies: Confessional/non confessional and global/local. In R. Jackson & S. Fujiwara (Eds.), Peace Education and Religious Plurality: International Perspectives. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dürr, K. (2005). The school: A democratic learning community. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dürr, K., Spajic-Vrkaš, V., & Martins, I. F. (2000). Strategies for learning democratic citizenship. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estivalezes, M. (2005). L’enseignement religieux en France: Un état des lieux de la situation contemporaine. In J. -P. Willaime & S. Mathieu (Eds.), Des Maîtres et des Dieux: Ecoles et Religions en Europe (pp. 223–235). Paris: Belin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estivalezes, M. (2006). Teaching about religion in the French education system. In: M. de Souza, K. Engebretson, G. Durka, R. Jackson & A. McGrady (Eds.), International handbook of the religious, moral and spiritual dimensions of education (pp. 475–486). The Netherlands: Springer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2003). Open Learning Environment, Active Citizenship and Social Inclusion. Implementation of Education and Training 2010, Work Programme: Progress Report. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurydice. (2005). Citizenship Education at School in Europe. The Information Network on Education in Europe (Eurydice). Brussels: European Commission available from at: http://www.eurydice.org accessed 19 January 2009

  • Eurydice. (2006). Spanish enquiry on the teaching of religious education in the 10 new Member States of the European Union (Cyprus, Slovakia, Slovenia, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Czech Republic), Eurydice at NFER website http://www.nfer.ac.uk/eurydice/ (accessed 19 January 2009).

  • Flutter, J., & Rudduck, J. (2004), Consulting pupils: What’s in it for schools? London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandolfo-Censi, G. (2000). Italy. In P. Schreiner (Ed.), Religious education in Europe (pp. 107–109). Münster: ICSS and the Comenius Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gearon, L. (2003). Citizenship education: A professional user review of research. Nottinghamshire: British Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gearon, L. (2006). Human rights and religious education: Some postcolonial perspectives. In M. de Souza, K. Engebretson, G. Durka, R. Jackson & A. McGrady (Eds.), International handbook of the religious, moral and spiritual dimensions of education (pp. 375–385). The Netherlands: Springer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grelle, B. (2006). Defining and promoting the study of religion in British and American schools. In M. de Souza, K. Engebretson, G. Durka, R. Jackson & A. McGrady (Eds.), International Handbook of the religious, moral and spiritual dimensions of education (pp. 461–474). The Netherlands: Springer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2006). Religion in the public sphere. European Journal of Philosophy, 14(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallett, C., & Prout, A. (Eds.). (2003). Hearing the voices of children: Social policy for a new century. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimbrock, H. G., Scheilke, C., & Schreiner, P., (Eds.). (2001). Towards religious competence: Diversity as a challenge for education in Europe. Münster: Lit Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huddleston, E., & Garabagiu, A. (Eds.) (2005). Education for Democratic Citizenship 2001–2004: Tool on Teacher Training for Education for Democratic Citizenship and Human Rights Education. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, J. (2002). The contribution of religious education to religious freedom: A global perspective. In H. Spinder, J. Taylor & W. Westerman (Eds.), Committed to Europe’s future: Contribitions from education and religious education: A reader (pp. 107–110). Münster: Coordinating Group for Religious Education in Europe (CoGREE) and the Comenius Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ipgrave, J. (2003). Dialogue, citizenship, and religious education. In R. Jackson (Ed.), International Perspectives on citizenship, education and religious diversity (pp. 147–168). London: RoutledgeFalmer

    Google Scholar 

  • Ipgrave, J. (2005). Pupil-to-pupil dialogue as a tool for religious education in the primary classroom. In R. Jackson & U. McKenna (Eds.), Intercultural Education and Religious Plurality (pp. 39–42). Oslo Coalition Occasional Papers (1). Oslo: The Oslo Coalition on Freedom of Religion or Belief

    Google Scholar 

  • Ipgrave, J., Jackson, R., & O’Grady, K. (Eds.). (forthcoming 2009). Religious education research through a community of practice: Action research and the interpretive approach. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. (1997). Religious education: An interpretive approach. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. (2000). Law, politics and religious education in England and Wales: Some history, some stories and some observations. In M. Leicester, C. Modgil & S. Modgil (Eds.), Spiritual and religious education (pp. 86–99). London: Falmer [Education, Culture and Values (Vol 5)].

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. (Ed.). (2003a). International perspectives on citizenship, education and religious diversity. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. (2003b). Citizenship, religious and cultural diversity and education. In R. Jackson (Ed.), International Perspectives on citizenship, education and religious diversity (pp. 1–28). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. (2004). Rethinking Religious Education and Plurality: Issues in Diversity and Pedagogy. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. (2006). Understanding religious diversity in a plural world: The interpretive approach. In M. de Souza, K. Engebretson, G. Durka, R. Jackson & A. McGrady (Eds.), International Handbook of the Religious, Moral and Spiritual Dimensions of Education (pp. 399–414). The Netherlands: Springer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. (2008a). Teaching about religions in the public sphere: European policy initiatives and the interpretive approach. Numen: International review for the history of religions, 55(2/3), 151–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. (2008b). The Emergence and Development of the Interpretive Approach. In H. Streib, A. Dinter, & K. Söderblom (Eds.), Lived Religion – Conceptual, Empirical and Practical-Theological Approaches: Essays in Honour of Hans-Günter Heimbrock (pp. 309–322). Leiden: Brill.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. (2008c). Hermeneutics and religious education: The interpretive approach in relation to the work of Jürgen Lott. In C. Dommel & G. Mitchell (Eds.), Religion education. On the boundaries between study of religions, education and theologies: Jürgen Lott and the Bremen Approach in International Perspective (pp. 189–208). Bremen: Kleio Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R., & Fujiwara, S. (Eds.). (2008). Peace education and religious plurality: International perspectives. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. Miedema, S. Weisse, W., & Willaime, J. -P. (Eds.). (2007). Religion and education in Europe: Developments, contexts and debates. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R., & Nesbitt, E. M. (1993). Hindu children in Britain. Stoke on Trent: Trentham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, W. K., & Ziebertz, H. -G. (2006). A nine-country survey of youth in Europe: Selected findings and issues. British Journal of Religious Education, 28(2), 119–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaymakcan, R. (2006). Relıgıous educatıon culture in modern Turkey. In M. de Souza, K. Engebretson, G. Durka, R. Jackson & A. McGrady (Eds.), International handbook of the religious, Moral and spiritual dimensions of education. (pp. 449–460). The Netherlands: Springer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Keast, J. (Ed.) (2007). Religious diversity and intercultural education: a reference book for schools. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, D. (1999). Citizenship education: An international comparison. International review of curriculum and assessment frameworks archive, http://www.inca.org.uk/thematic.asp (Accessed online, 2/2/04).

  • Kerr, D. (2003). Citizenship: Local, national and international. In L. Gearon (Ed.), Learning to teach citizenship in the secondary school (pp. 5–27). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knauth, T., Jozsa, D.-P., Bertram-Troost, G., & Ipgrave, J. (Eds.). (2008). Encountering religious pluralism in school and society: a qualitative study of teenage perspectives in Europe. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodelja, Z., & Bassler, T. (2004). Religion and schooling in open society: A framework for informed dialogue. Ljubljana: Open Society Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozyrev, F., & ter Avest, I. (2007). ‘Religious culture’ as a school subject. British Journal of Religious Education, 29(3), 245–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuyk, E., Jensen, R., Lanskhear, D., Löh Manna, E., & Schreiner, P. (Eds.). (2007). Religious education in Europe. Situation and current trends in schools. Oslo: IKO/ICCS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, R. (2000). Sweden. In P. Schreiner (Ed.), Religious education in Europe (pp. 159–164). Münster: ICCS and Comenius Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, R., & Gustavsson, C. (Eds.). (2004). Towards a European perspective on religious education. Stockholm: Artos & Norma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leganger-Krogstad, H. (2000). Developing a contextual theory and practice of religious education. Panorama: International Journal of Comparative Religious Education and Values, 12(1), 94–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leganger-Krogstad, H. (2001). Religious education in a global perspective: A contextual approach. In H. -G. Heimbrock, P. Schreiner & C. Sheilke (Eds.), Towards Religious competence: Diversity as a Challenge for education in Europe (pp. 53–73). Hamburg: Lit Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leganger-Krogstad, H. (2003). Dialogue among young citizens in a pluralistic religious education classroom. In R. Jackson (Ed.). International Perspectives on citizenship, education and religious diversity (pp. 169–190). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacEwen, M. (Ed.). (1995). Tackling racism in Europe: An examination of anti-discrimination law in practice. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrady, A. (2006). Religious education, citizenship and human rights. In M. de Souza, K. Engebretson, G. Durka, R. Jackson & A. McGrady (Eds.), International Handbook of the religious, moral and spiritual dimensions of education. The Netherlands: Springer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, U., Ipgrave, J., & Jackson, R. (2008). Interfaith dialogue by email in primary schools: An evaluation of the building e-bridges project. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. H. (1992). Citizenship, diversity and education: A philosophical perspective. Journal of Moral Education, 21(3), 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, B. (2002). The rise of the European right, BBC News, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/1944157.stm accessed 19 January, 2009.

  • Meijer, W. A. J. (1995). The plural self: A hermeneutical view on identity and plurality. British Journal of Religious Education, 17(2), 92–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, W. A. J. (2006). Plural selves and living traditions: A hermeneutical view on identity and diversity, tradition and historicity. In M. de Souza, K. Engebretson, G. Durka, R. Jackson & A. McGrady (Eds.), International handbook of the religious, moral and spiritual dimensions of education (pp. 321–332). The Netherlands: Springer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miedema, S., Schreiner, P., Skeie, G., & Jackson, R. (2004). The European Network for Religious Education through Contextual Approaches (ENRECA): Its policy and aims. In U. Nembach, H. Rusterholz & P. Zulehner (Eds.), Informationes Theologiae Europae: Internationales Õkumenisches Jahrbuch für Thelogie (Vol. 13, pp. 227–232). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Langand; Panorama: International Journal of Comparative Religious Education and Values, 16(Summer/Winter 2004), 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milot, M., (2001). Etude des religions et éducation citoyenne: enjeux politiques et juridiques. In M. Pagé, F. Ouellet et & L. Cortesão (Eds.), L’éducation à la citoyenneté (pp. 203–212). Editions du CRP, Faculté d’éducation, Université de Sherbrooke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T. (1997). ‘Difference’, cultural racism and antiracism. In P. Werbner & T. Modood (Eds.), Debating cultural hybridity (pp. 154–172). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T., Triandafyllidou, A., & Zapata-Barrero, R. (Eds.). (2006). Multiculturalism, Muslims and citizenship: A European approach. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesbitt, E. (2004). Intercultural education: Ethnographic and religious approaches. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesbitt, E. (2006). Ethnography, religion and intercultural education. In M. de Souza, K. Engebretson, G. Durka, R. Jackson & A. McGrady (Eds.), International handbook of the religious, moral and spiritual dimensions of education (pp. 387–398). The Netherlands: Springer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • O’Grady, K. (2003). Motivation in religious education: A collaborative investigation with year eight students. British Journal of Religious Education, 25(3), 212–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Grady, K. (2005). Pedagogy, dialogue and truth: Intercultural education in the religious education classroom. In R. Jackson & U. McKenna (Eds.), Intercultural education and religious plurality (pp. 25–33). Oslo Coalition Occasional Papers (1) Oslo: The Oslo Coalition on Freedom of Religion or Belief.

    Google Scholar 

  • Østberg, S. (2003). Pakistani children in Norway: Islamic nurture in a Secular context (Monograph Series). Leeds: University of Leeds, Community Religions Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Østberg, S. (2006). Islamic nurture and identity management: The lifeworld of Muslim children and young people in Norway. In M. de Souza, K. Engebretson, G. Durka, R. Jackson & A. McGrady (Eds.), International handbook of the religious, moral and spiritual dimensions of education (pp. 501–512). The Netherlands: Springer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • OSCE. (2007). Toledo guiding principles on teaching about religions and beliefs in public schools, (Warsaw: Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe, Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights). (full text available at http://www.osce.org/item/28314.html accessed 30 December, 2009).

  • Ouellet, F., (2000). L’enseignement culturel des religions. Le débat (Editions du CRP, Faculté d’éducation, Université de Sherbrooke).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouellet F., (2001). Les questions touchant le sens dans l’éducation à la citoyenneté. In M. Pagé, F. Ouellet et, & L. Cortesão, L’éducation à la citoyenneté (pp. 243–258). Editions du CRP, Faculté d’éducation, Université de Sherbrooke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouellet, F. (2006). Religious education and citizenship in postmodern societies. In M. de Souza, K. Engebretson, G. Durka, R. Jackson & A. McGrady (Eds.), International handbook of the religious, moral and spiritual dimensions of education (pp. 363–374). The Netherlands: Springer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • QCA. (2004). Religious education: The non-statutory national framework. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paludan, P., & Prinds, E. (1999). Evaluation of education in citizenship and moral judgement. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prout, A. (2001). Researching children as social actors: An introduction to the children 5–16 research programme. Children and society, 16(2), 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. The Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, R. (Ed.). (2004). Islamophobia: Issues, challenges and action, commission on British Muslims and Islamophobia. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, K. (2006). The challenge of transcultural diversities. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runnymede Trust. (1997). Islamophobia: A challenge for US all. London: Runnymede Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schihalejev, O. (2010). Estonian young people, religion and religious diversity: personal views and the role of the school. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiner, P. (2002). Different approaches – common aims? current developments in religious education in Europe. In P. Schreiner, H. Spinder, J. Taylor & W. Westerman (Eds.), Committed to Europe’s future: Contributions from education and religious education: A reader (pp. 95–100). Münster: Coordinating Group for Religious Education in Europe (CoGREE) and the Comenius Institut).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, F. (2006). Let the captives speak for themselves! More dialogue between religious education in England and Germany. British Journal of Religious Education, 28(2), 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skeie, G. (1995). Plurality and pluralism: A challenge for religious education, British Journal of Religious Education, 25(1), 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skeie, G. (2006). Plurality and pluralism in religious education. In M. de Souza, K. Engebretson, G. Durka, R. Jackson & A. McGrady (Eds.), International handbook of the religious, moral and spiritual dimensions of education (pp. 307–319).The Netherlands: Springer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Torney-Purta, J., Lehmann, R., Oswald, H., & Schulz, W. (2001). Citizenship and education in twenty-eight countries: Civic knowledge and engagement at age fourteen: Executive summary. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA)). http://www.wam.umd.edu/~jtpurta/exec_summ/Exe%20Sum%20embargoed.pdf. accessed July 2006.

  • Tutu, D. (2000). No future without forgiveness: A personal overview of South Africa’s truth and reconciliation commission. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (1996). Learning: The Treasure Within (the Delors Report), The report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valk, P. (2000). From the Soviet atheism to the national identity: A specific background for the religious education in Estonia. Panorama: International Journal of Comparative Religious Education and Values, 12(1), 78–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valk, P., Bertram-Troost, G., Friederici, M., & Beraud, C. (Eds.). (2009). Teenagers’ perspectives on the role of religion in their lives, school and Society. A European quantitative study. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisse, W. (Ed.). (1996). Interreligious and intercultural education: Methodologies, conceptions and pilot projects in South Africa, Namibia, Great Britain, the Netherlands and Germany. Münster: Comenius Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisse, W. (2003). Difference without discrimination: Religious education as a field of learning for social understanding. In R. Jackson (Ed.), International Perspectives on Citizenship, Education and Religious Diversity (pp. 191–208). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willaime, J. -P. (2005). Europe et Religions. Les Enjeux du XXIe Siècle. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willaime, J. -P., (2008). The paradoxes of laïcité in France. In: E. Barker (Ed.), The centrality of religion in social life: Essays in honour of James A. Beckford (pp. 41–54). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willaime, J. -P., & Mathieu, S. (Eds.). (2005). Des Maîtres et des Dieux: Ecoles et Religions en Europe. Paris: Belin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, A. (2006). Critical realism as a tool for the interpretation of cultural diversity in liberal religious education. In M. de Souza, K. Engebretson, G. Durka, R. Jackson & A. McGrady (Eds.), International handbook of the religious, moral and spiritual dimensions of education (pp. 333–347). The Netherlands: Springer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zonne, E. (2006). Interreligiöses und Interkulturelles Lernen und Grundschulen in Rotterdam-Rijnmond, religious diversity and education in Europe series. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Jackson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jackson, R. (2010). Religious Diversity and Education for Democratic Citizenship: The Contribution of the Council of Europe. In: Engebretson, K., de Souza, M., Durka, G., Gearon, L. (eds) International Handbook of Inter-religious Education. International Handbooks of Religion and Education, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9260-2_66

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics