Skip to main content

Learning Within the BDI Framework: An Empirical Analysis

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3683))

Abstract

One of the limitations of the BDI (Belief-Desire-Intention) model is the lack of any explicit mechanisms within the architecture to be able to learn. In particular, BDI agents do not possess the ability to adapt based on past experience. This is important in dynamic environments since they can change, causing methods for achieving goals that worked well previously to become inefficient or ineffective. We present a model in which learning can be utilised by a BDI agent and verify this model experimentally using two learning algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Jennings, N.R.: An Agent-based Approach for Building Complex Software Systems. Communications of the ACM 44(4), 35–41 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wooldridge, M.: An Introduction To MultiAgent Systems, 1st edn. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bratman, M.E.: Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason, 1st edn. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: BDI-Agents: From Theory to Practice. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multiagent Systems (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Muggleton, S.: Inductive Logic Programming, 1st edn. Academic Press, London (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Ng, K.S.: Alkemy: A Learning System Based on an Expressive Knowledge Representation (2004), Available from http://users.rsise.anu.edu.au/~kee/Alkemy/

  7. Laird, J.E., Newell, A., Rosenbloom, P.: SOAR: An Architecture for General Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 3, 1–64 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Olivia, C., Chang, C.F., Enguix, C.F., Ghose, A.K.: Case-Based BDI Agents: An Effective Approach for Intelligent Search on the World Wide Web. In: AAAI Spring Symposium (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alonso, E., Kudenko, D.: Logic-Based Multi-Agent Systems for Conflict Simulations. In: d’Inverno, M., Luck, M., Fisher, M., Preist, C. (eds.) UKMAS Workshops 1996-2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2403, p. 59. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Veloso, M., Carbonell, J., Perez, A., Borrajo, D., Fink, E., Blythe, J.: Integrating Planning and Learning: The PRODIGY Architecture. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 7(1) (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Phung, T., Winikoff, M., Padgham, L. (2005). Learning Within the BDI Framework: An Empirical Analysis. In: Khosla, R., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3683. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11553939_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11553939_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28896-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31990-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics