Skip to main content

Temporary immersion system: a new concept for use liquid medium in mass propagation

  • Chapter
Liquid Culture Systems for in vitro Plant Propagation

Abstract

Mass propagation of plants by tissue culture is labour intensive and costly. Gelling agents have many drawbacks: they are not inert medium components and do not enable easy automation for commercial mass propagation. So liquid culture systems are considered to have advantages, e.g. culture conditions are much more uniform, media can be changed easily. The use of liquid medium for in vitro culture has many advantages and has been the subject of many studies over many years. It has also frequently been considered an ideal technique for mass production as it reduces manual labor and facilitates changing the medium composition. Techniques and culture vessels of varying complexity have been developed as a result of studies.

The major disadvantage of a liquid medium is hyperhydricity, which is a severe physiological disorder. So we considered that to compensate for this problem it would be necessary to expose the plant to the liquid medium intermittently rather than continuously. For this the bioreactors previously developed are not suitable as they are mainly adapted to bacterial culture and do not take into account the specific requirements of plant cells and tissues, such as sensitivity to shear forces, mechanical damages or foam formation in bubble aerated bioreactors.

So temporary immersion systems for plant micropropagation have been described and grouped into 4 categories according to operation: i) tilting and rocker machines, ii) complete immersion of plant material and renewal of nutrient medium, iii) partial immersion and a liquid nutrient renewal mechanism, iiii) complete immersion by pneumatic driven transfer of liquid medium and without nutrient medium renewal. The positive effects of temporary immersion on micropropagation are indicated for shoot proliferation and microcuttings, microtuberization and somatic embryogenesis. Immersion time, i.e. duration or frequency, is the most critical parameter for system efficiency. Optimizing the volume of nutrient medium and the volume of container also substancially improves efficiency, especially for shoot proliferation. Temporary immersion also generally improves plant tissue quality. It results in increased shoot vigour and quantity of morphologically normal somatic embryos. Hyperhydricity, which seriously affects cultures in liquid medium, is eliminated with these culture systems or controlled by adjusting the immersion times.

Plant material propagated by temporary immersion performs better during the acclimatization phase than material obtained on semi-solid or liquid media. Successful regeneration of Solanum tuberosum microtubers and Coffea arabica somatic embryos produced in temporary immersion bioreactors after direct sowing on soil has been demonstrated. As was predicted, when using liquid medium for micropropagation, several investigations have confirmed large gains in efficiency from temporary immersion. The parameters most involved in reducing production costs are, firstly a large reduction in labour, followed by a reduction in shelving area requirement and the number of containers used, along with better biological yields. Scaling up embryogenesis and shoot proliferation procedures involving temporary immersion systems are now taking place, in order to commercialize this process. To improve this system as well in research as in commercial production, CIRAD has developed a new simple and specific apparatus for plant tissue culture using temporary immersion in liquid medium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aitken-Christe J & Davies HE (1988) Development of a semi-automated micropropagation system. Acta Hort. 230: 81–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitken-Christie J, Jones C & Bond S (1985) Wet and waxy shoots in radiata pine micropropagation. Acta Hortic. 166: 93–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitken-Christie J & Jones C (1987) Towards automation: radiata pine shoot hedges in vitro. Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 8: 185–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Akita M & Takayama S (1994) Stimulation of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tuberization by semicontinuous liquid medium surface level control. Plant Cell Rep. 13: 184–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvard D, Côte F & Teisson C (1993) Comparison of methods of liquid medium culture for banana micropropagation. Effects of temporary immersion of explants. Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 32: 55–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthouly M, Dufour M, Alvard D, Carasco C, Alemano L & Teisson C (1995) Coffee micropropagation in a liquid medium using the temporary immersion technique. In: ASIC Publishers (eds) 16th International Scientific Colloquium on Coffee, Kyoto, Japon (pp. 514–519). Vevey, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthouly M & Etienne H (1999) Somatic embryogenesis of coffee. In: Jain SM, Gupta PK & Newton RJ (eds) Somatic Embryogenesis in Woody Plants, Vol. 5 (pp. 259–288). Kluwer Academic Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabasson C, Alvard D, Dambier D, Ollitrault P & Teisson C (1997) Improvement of Citrus somatic embryo development by temporary immersion. Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 50: 33–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu I (1995) Economic analysis of automated micropropagation. In: Aitken-Christie J, Kozai T, Smith MAL (eds) Automation and Environmental Control in Plant Tissue Culture (pp. 19–27). Kluwer Academic Publischers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor AJ & Meredith CP (1984) An improved polyurethane support system for monitoring growth in plant cell cultures. Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 3: 59–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Debergh P (1988) Improving mass propagation of in vitro plantlets. In: Kozai T (ed) Horticulture in High Technology Era (pp. 45–57). International Symposium on High Technology in Protected Cultivation, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Debergh P, Harbaooui Y & Lemeur R (1981) Mass propagation of globe artichoke (Cynara scolymus) Evaluation of different hypotheses to overcome vitrification with special reference to water potential. Physiol. Plant. 53: 181–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Escalant J-V, Teisson C & Côte F (1994) Amplified somatic embryogenesis from male flowers of triploid banana and plantain cultivars (Musa spp.). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 30: 181–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Escalona M, Lorenzo JC, González B, Daquinta M, Fundora Z, Borroto CG, Espinosa D, Arias E & Aspiolea ME (1998) New system for in vitro propagation of pineapple (Ananas comosus (L.) Merr). Pineapple News 5: 5–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Escalona M, Lorenzo JC, González B, Daquinta M, González JL, Desjardins Y & Borroto CG (1999) Pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr) micropropagation in temporary immersion systems. Plant Cell Rep. 18: 743–748

    Google Scholar 

  • Etienne H, Berger A & Carron MP (1991) Water status of callus from Hevea brasiliensis during induction of somatic embryogenesis. Physiol. Plant. 82: 213–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Etienne H, Bertrand B, Anthony F, Côte F & Berthouly M (1997a) L’embryogenèse somatique: un outil pour l’amélioration génétique du caféier. In: ASIC Publishers (eds) 17th International Scientific Colloquiun on Coffee, Nairobi, Kenya (pp. 457–465). Vevey, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Etienne H, Lartaud M, Michaux-Ferrière N, Carron MP, Berthouly M & Teisson C (1997b) Improvement of somatic embryogenesis in Hevea brasiliensis (Müll. Arg.) using the temporary immersion technique. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant. 33: 81–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Etienne-Barry D, Bertrand B, Vásquez N & Etienne H (1999) Direct sowing of Coffea arabica somatic embryos mass-produced in a bioreactor and regeneration of plants. Plant Cell Rep. 19: 111–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawel NJ & Robacker CD (1990) Somatic embryogenesis in two Gossypium hirsutum genotypes on semi-solid versus liquid proliferation media. Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 23: 201–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton R, Pederson H & Chin CK (1985) Plant tissue culture on membrane rafts. Bio Techniques. March/April, p. 96

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerschlag F (1982) Factors affecting establishment and growth of peach shoots in vitro. HortScience 17: 85–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris RE & Mason EB (1983) Two machines for in vitro propagation of plants in liquid media. Can. J. Plant Sci. 63: 311–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris RE & Stevenson JH (1982) In vitro propagation of Vitis. Vitis 21: 22–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussey G (1986) Problems and prospects in the in vitro propagation of herbaceous plants. In: Withers LA & Alderson PG (eds) Plant Tissue Culture and its Agricultural Applications (pp. 69–84). Butterworths, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez E, Pérez J, Gil V, Herrera J, García Y & Alonso E (1995) Sistema para la propagación de la caña de azucar. In: Estrade M, Riego E, Limonta E, Tellez P & Fuente J (eds) Avances en Biotecnología Moderna, Vol 3 (pp. 11–20). Elfos Scientiae, Cuba

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones AM & Petolino JF (1988) Effects of support medium on embryo and plant production from cultured anthers of soft-red winter wheat. Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 12: 243–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitto SL (1997) Commercial micropropagation. Hort. Sci. 32: 1012–1014

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger S, Robacker C & Simonton W (1991) Culture of Amelanchier x grandiflora in a programmable micropropagation apparatus. Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 27: 219–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu CM, Xu Z-H & Chua N-H (1993) Auxin polar transport is essential for the establishment of bilateral symmetry during early plant embryogenesis. The Plant Cell 5: 621–630

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzo JC, Gonzalez BL, Escalona M, Teisson C, Espinosa P & Borroto C (1998) Sugarcane shoot formation in an improved temporary immersion system. Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 54: 197–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Maene L & Debergh P (1985) Liquid medium additions to established tissue cultures to improve elongation and rooting in vivo. Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 5: 23–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Monette PL (1983) Influence of size of culture vessel on in vitro proliferation of grape in a liquid medium. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 2: 327–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Noriega C & Söndahl MR (1993) Arabica coffee micropropagation through somatic embryogenesis via bioreactors. In: ASIC publishers (eds) 15th International Scientific Colloquium on Coffee, Montpellier, France (pp. 73–81). Vevey, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuther G (1985) Principles and application of the micropropagation of ornemental plants. In: Schäfer-Menuhr A (ed) In Vitro Techniques: Propagation and Long-Term Storage (pp. 1–14). Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton W & Robacker C (1988) Alternative system for micropropagation. Amer. Soc. Agr. Engineers, Technical Paper No 88-1028

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton W, Robacker C & Krueger S (1991) A programmable micropropagation apparatus using cycled medium. Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 27: 211–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Sluis CJ & Walker KA (1985) Commercialization of plant tissue culture propagation. Intl. Assoc. Plant Tiss. Cult. Newsl. 47: 2–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith DR (1985) Pinus radiata. In: Bajaj YPS (ed) Trees. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Vol 1 (pp. 274–291). Springer Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith MAL & Spomer LA (1995) Vessels, gels, liquid media and support systems. In: Aitken-Christie J, Kozai T & Smith MAL(eds) Automation and Environmental Control in plant tissue culture (pp. 371–405). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Söndhal SP, Nakamicra F, Medince Filho MP, Carvalho A, Fazuoli LC & Caslo WM (1989) Coffee Handbook of Plant Cell Culture, Vol III, Chap. 21

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson JH & Harris RE (1980) In vitro plantlet formation from shoot tip explants of Fuchsia hybrida cv. Swingtime. Can. J. Bot. 58: 2190–2192

    Google Scholar 

  • Teisson C & Alvard D (1995) A new concept of plant in vitro cultivation liquid medium: temporary immersion. In: Terzi M et al. (eds) Current Issues in Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology (pp. 105–110). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Teisson C & Alvard D (1999) In vitro production of potato microtubers in liquid medium using temporay immersion. Potato research 42: 499–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Teisson C, Alvard D, Lartaud M, Etienne H, Berthouly M, Escalona M & Lorenzo JC (1999) Temporary immersion for plant tissue culture. In: Plant Biotechnology and In vitro Biology in the 21st Century, Proceedings of the IXth International Congress of Plant Tissue and Cell Culture, Section H: Novel micropropagation methods (pp. 629–632). Jerusalem

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisserat B, Jones D & Galletta PD (1993) Construction and use of an inexpensive in vitro ultrasonic misting system. Hort. Technology 3: 75–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisserat B & Vandercook CE (1985) Development of an automated plant culture system. Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 5: 107–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardle K, Dobbs EB & Short KC (1983) In vitro acclimatization of aseptically cultured plantlets to humidity. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 108: 386–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Wataad A, Raghothana KG, Kochba M, Nissim A & Caba V (1997) Micropropagation of Spathiphyllum and Syngonium is facilited by use of interfacial membrane rafts. HortScience 32: 307–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Weathers PJ, Cheetham RD & Giles KL (1988) Dramatic increases in shoot number and lengths for Musa, Cordyline and Nephrolepsis using nutrient mists. Acta Hort. 230: 39–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Weathers PJ & Giles KL (1988) Regeneration of plants using nutrient mist culture. In vitro Cellular and Development Biology 24: 727–732

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamarripa A, Ducos JP, Tessereau H, Bollon H, Eskes AB & Petiard V (1991) Developpement d’un procédé de multiplication de masse en masse du caféier par embryogenèse somatique en milieu liquide. In: ASIC Publishers (eds) 14th International Scientific Colloquium on Coffee, San Francisco, US (pp. 392–402). Vevey, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziv M, Meir G & Halevy AH (1983) Factors influencing the production of hardened glaucous carnation plantlets in vitro. Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 2: 55–65

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berthouly, M., Etienne, H. (2005). Temporary immersion system: a new concept for use liquid medium in mass propagation. In: Hvoslef-Eide, A.K., Preil, W. (eds) Liquid Culture Systems for in vitro Plant Propagation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3200-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics