Abstract
Glass patterns are structured dot stimuli used to investigate the visual perception of global form. Studies have demonstrated that humans and pigeons differ in their processing of circular versus linearly organized Glass patterns. To test whether this comparative difference is characteristic of birds as a phylogenetic class, we investigated for the first time how a passerine (starlings, Sturnus vulgaris) discriminated multiple Glass patterns from random-dot stimuli in a simultaneous discrimination. By examining acquisition, steady-state performance, and the effects of diminishing global coherence, it was found that the perception of Glass patterns by 5 starlings differed from human perception and corresponded to that established with pigeons. This suggests an important difference in how birds and primates are specialized in their processing of circular visual patterns, perhaps related to face perception, or in how these highly visual animals direct attention to the global and local components of spatially separated form stimuli.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bennett, A. T. D., Cuthill, I. C., Partridge, J. C., & Lunau, K. (1997). Ultraviolet plumage colors predict mate preferences in starlings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 94(16), 8618–8621.
Bock, W. J., & Farrand, J., Jr. (1980). The number of species and genera of recent birds: A contribution to comparative systematics. American Museum Novitates, 2703, 1–29.
Brown, J. W., Rest, J. S., Garcia-Moreno, J., Sorenson, M. D., & Mindell, D. P. (2008). Strong mitochondrial DNA support for a Cretaceous origin of modern avian lineages. BMC Biology, 6, 6. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-6-6
Cavoto, K. K., & Cook, R. G. (2001). Cognitive precedence for local information in hierarchical stimulus processing by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27(1), 3–16. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.27.1.3
Chojnowski, J. L., Kimball, R. T., & Braun, E. L. (2008). Introns outperform exons in analyses of basal avian phylogeny using clathrin heavy chain genes. Gene, 410(1), 89–96. doi:10.1016/j.gene.2007.11.016
Cook, R. G. (2001). Avian visual cognition retrieved from www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc
Cook, R. G., Qadri, M. A. J., Kieres, A., & Commons-Miller, N. (2012). Shape from shading in pigeons. Cognition, 124(3), 284–303. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.007
Dolan, T., & Fernández-Juricic, E. (2010). Retinal ganglion cell topography of five species of ground-foraging birds. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 75(2), 111–121.
Emery, N. J. (2006). Cognitive ornithology: The evolution of avian intelligence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 361, 23–43. doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1736
Endler, J. A., Westcott, D. A., Madden, J. R., & Robson, T. (2005). Animal visual systems and the evolution of color patterns: Sensory processing illuminates signal evolution. Evolution, 59(8), 1795–1818.
Feare, C. (1984). The starling. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Forkman, B. (1998). Hens use occlusion to judge depth in a two-dimensional picture. Perception, 27(7), 861–867. doi:10.1068/P270861
Fujita, I., Tanaka, K., Ito, M., & Cheng, K. (1992). Columns for visual features of objects in monkey inferotemporal cortex. Nature, 360(6402), 343–346. doi:10.1038/360343a0
Gallant, J. L., Braun, J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1993). Selectivity for polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in macaque visual cortex. Science, 259(5091), 100–103.
Ghim, M. M., & Hodos, W. (2006). Spatial contrast sensitivity of birds. Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 192(5), 523–534.
Glass, L. (1969). Moire effect from random dots. Nature, 223(5206), 578–580.
Gutiérrez-Ibáñez, C., Iwaniuk, A. N., Moore, B. A., Fernández-Juricic, E., Corfield, J. R., Krilow, J. M., & Wylie, D. R. (2014). Mosaic and concerted evolution in the visual system of birds. PLoS ONE, 9(3), e90102.
Hart, N. S. (2001). Variations in cone photoreceptor abundance and the visual ecology of birds. Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 187(9), 685–697.
Hart, N. S., Partridge, J. C., & Cuthill, I. C. (2000). Retinal asymmetry in birds. Current Biology, 10(2), 115–117.
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. The Journal of Physiology, 160(1), 106–154.
Husband, S., & Shimizu, T. (2001). Evolution of the avian visual system. In R. G. Cook (Ed.), Avian visual cognition. [On-line]. Available: www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/husband/
Iwaniuk, A. N., & Hurd, P. L. (2005). The evolution of cerebrotypes in birds. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 65(4), 215–230. doi:10.1159/000084313
Jarvis, E., Güntürkün, O., Bruce, L., Csillag, A., Karten, H., Kuenzel, W., & Shimizu, T. (2005). Avian brains and a new understanding of vertebrate brain evolution. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(2), 151–159. doi:10.1038/nrn1606
Jassik-Gerschenfeld, D., & Guichard, J. (1972). Visual receptive fields of single cells in the pigeon's optic tectum. Brain Research, 40, 303–317.
Jones, M. P., Pierce, K. E., Jr., & Ward, D. (2007). Avian vision: A review of form and function with special consideration to birds of prey. Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine, 16(2), 69–87. doi:10.1053/j.jepm.2007.03.012
Kanwisher, N., & Yovel, G. (2006). The fusiform face area: A cortical region specialized for the perception of faces. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 361(1476), 2109–2128. doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1934
Kelly, D. M., Bischof, W. F., Wong-Wylie, D. R., & Spetch, M. L. (2001). Detection of glass patterns by pigeons and humans: Implications for differences in higher-level processing. Psychological Science, 12(4), 338–342.
Martin, G. (1986). The eye of a passeriform bird, the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): Eye movement amplitude, visual fields and schematic optics. Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 159(4), 545–557.
Martin, G. (2007). Visual fields and their functions in birds. Journal of Ornithology, 148(S2), 547–562. doi:10.1007/s10336-007-0213-6
Qadri, M. A. J., Romero, L. M., & Cook, R. G. (in press). Shape-from-shading in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Journal of Comparative Psychology
Swaddle, J. P., Che, J. P. K., & Clelland, R. E. (2004). Symmetry preference as a cognitive by-product in starlings. Behaviour, 141(4), 469–478. doi:10.1163/156853904323066748
Swaddle, J. P., & Pruett-Jones, S. (2001). Starlings can categorize symmetry differences in dot displays. American Naturalist, 158(3), 300–307. doi:10.1086/321323
Swaddle, J. P., & Witter, M. S. (1995). Chest plumage, dominance and fluctuating asymmetry in female starlings. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 260(1358), 219–223. doi:10.1098/rspb.1995.0083
Templeton, J. J., & Gonzalez, D. P. (2004). Reverse lateralization of visual discriminative abilities in the European starling. Animal Behaviour, 67, 783–788. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.04.011
Vallortigara, G. (2006). The cognitive chicken: Visual and spatial cognition in a nonmammalian brain. In E. A. Wasserman & T. R. Zentall (Eds.), Comparative cognition: Experimental explorations of animal intelligence (pp. 71–86). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Wilkinson, F., James, T. W., Wilson, H. R., Gati, J. S., Menon, R. S., & Goodale, M. A. (2000). An fMRI study of the selective activation of human extrastriate form vision areas by radial and concentric gratings. Current Biology, 10(22), 1455–1458. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00800-9
Wilson, H. R., & Wilkinson, F. (1998). Detection of global structure in Glass patterns: Implications for form vision. Vision Research, 38(19), 2933–2947.
Wilson, H. R., Wilkinson, F., & Asaad, W. (1997). Concentric orientation summation in human form vision. Vision Research, 37(17), 2325–2330. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00104-1
Zeigler, H. P., & Bischof, W. F. (1993). Vision, brain, and behavior in birds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary Figure 1
Comprehensive sampling of displays used during training the starlings. The left labels indicate local group type, the top labels indicate global pattern, and the right labels indicate visual angle of the total pattern. (DOC 4028 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qadri, M.A.J., Cook, R.G. The perception of Glass patterns by starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Psychon Bull Rev 22, 687–693 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0709-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0709-z