Skip to main content
Log in

Paradoxes of optimal decision making: a response to Moran (2014)

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Griffiths, T.L., Vul, E., Sanborn, A.N. (2012). Bridging levels of analysis for probabilistic models of cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 263–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanks, T.D., Mazurek, M.E., Kiani, R., Hopp, E., Shadlen, M.N. (2011). Elapsed decision time affects the weighting of prior probability in a perceptual decision task. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 6339–6352.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Ravenzwaaij, D., Mulder, M.J., Tuerlinckx, F., Wagenmakers, E.J. (2012). Do the dynamics of prior information depend on task context? An analysis of optimal performance and an empirical test. Frontiers in Cognitive Science, 3, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Don van Ravenzwaaij.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van Ravenzwaaij, D., Mulder, M.J., Tuerlinckx, F. et al. Paradoxes of optimal decision making: a response to Moran (2014). Psychon Bull Rev 22, 307–308 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0679-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0679-1

Keywords

Navigation