Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How does testing affect retrieval-related processes? An event-related potential (ERP) study on the short-term effects of repeated retrieval

  • Published:
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The testing effect is conceptualized as the benefit for remembering items that were studied and tested rather than just studied. Thus far, little is known about the underlying neurocognitive mechanisms. In an event-related potential (ERP) study, we investigated the immediate consequences of testing on recollection processes. During an initial study phase, participants encountered object names together with pictures of the denoted objects (“perceived items”) or with the instruction to mentally visualize them (“imagined items”). Directly afterward, they had to differentiate between perceived, imagined, and new items, in two consecutive source memory tests. Half of the studied items were presented in the first run, and all items in the second. Behaviorally, repeated testing led to improved item and source memory, as well as faster reaction times, relative to items that had been tested once. In accordance with these behavioral changes, the left parietal old–new effect (500–900 ms) as the putative correlate of recollection was strongly enhanced by previous testing. An enhancement after testing was also observed for the early portion of the late right frontal old–new effect (700–900 ms). In contrast, old–new effects after 900 ms were not modulated by previous testing. The finding of a stronger left parietal old–new effect for previously tested items suggests that testing leads to an elaboration of memory traces, whereas the faster reaction times are more likely explained in terms of transfer-appropriate processing. The combination of more elaborated memory traces and transfer-appropriate processing provides a tentative explanation for the effectiveness of testing in enhancing retrieval performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addante, R. J., Ranganath, C., Olichney, J., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2012). Neurophysiological evidence for a recollection impairment in amnesia patients that leaves familiarity intact. Neuropsychologia, 50, 3004–3014. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Addante, R. J., Ranganath, C., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2012). Examining ERP correlates of recognition memory: Evidence of accurate source recognition without recollection. NeuroImage, 62, 439–450.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1063–1087. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1063

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, R., Mecklinger, A., Hoppstädter, M., & Meyer, P. (2010). Recognition memory for one-trial-unitized word pairs: Evidence from event-related potentials. NeuroImage, 50, 772–781. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In A. Healy, S. Kosslyn, & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 2, pp. 35–67). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Bridger, E. K., Bader, R., Kriukova, O., Unger, K., & Mecklinger, A. (2012). The FN400 is functionally distinct from the N400. NeuroImage, 63, 1334–1342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2008). Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing. Memory & Cognition, 36, 604–616. doi:10.3758/MC.36.3.604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruse, D., & Wilding, E. L. (2009). Prefrontal cortex contributions to episodic retrieval monitoring and evaluation. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2779–2789. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.06.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cruse, D., & Wilding, E. L. (2011). Temporally and functionally dissociable retrieval processing operations revealed by event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1751–1760.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, T. (2004). Effects of attention and confidence on the hypothesized ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1088–1106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, T., DeBuse, C., & Leynes, P. A. (2007). Conflict and criterion setting in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 2–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Chastelaine, M., Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y. M., & Horton, C. (2009). Effects of multiple study–test repetition on the neural correlates of recognition memory: ERPs dissociate remembering and knowing. Psychophysiology, 46, 86–99.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diana, R. A., Reder, L. M., Arndt, J., & Park, H. (2006). Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 1–21. doi:10.3758/BF03193807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diana, R. A., Van den Boom, W., Yonelinas, A. P., & Ranganath, C. (2011). ERP correlates of source memory: Unitized source information increases familiarity-based retrieval. Brain Research, 1367, 278–286. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.10.030

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diana, R. A., Yonelinas, A. P., & Ranganath, C. (2007). Imaging recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe: A three-component model. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 379–386. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, I. G., & Han, S. (2006). Isolating rule- versus evidence-based prefrontal activity during episodic and lexical discrimination: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of detection theory distinctions. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 1614–1622.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Düzel, E., Vargha-Khadem, F., Heinze, H. J., & Mishkin, M. (2001). Brain activity evidence for recognition without recollection after early hippocampal damage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 8101–8106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Düzel, E., Yonelinas, A. P., Mangun, G. R., Heinze, H. J., & Tulving, E. (1997). Event-related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94, 5973–5978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichenbaum, H., Yonelinas, A. P., & Ranganath, C. (2007). The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 123–152. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094328

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, J., Kalpouzos, G., & Nyberg, L. (2011). Rewiring the brain with repeated retrieval: A parametric fMRI study of the testing effect. Neuroscience Letters, 505, 36–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L. H., & Wilding, E. L. (2012). Recollection and familiarity make independent contributions to memory judgments. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 7253–7257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, V., Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Karlsson, M., & Lang, P. J. (2013). Repetition and brain potentials when recognizing natural scenes: Task and emotion differences. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8, 847–854.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finnigan, S., Humphreys, M. S., Dennis, S., & Geffen, G. (2002). ERP “old/new” effects: Memory strength and decisional factor(s). Neuropsychologia, 40, 2288–2304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto, T., Usui, N., Taira, M., & Kojima, S. (2011). Neural enhancement and attenuation induced by repetitive recall. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 96, 143–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayama, H. R., Johnson, J. D., & Rugg, M. D. (2008). The relationship between the right frontal old/new ERP effect and post-retrieval monitoring: Specific or non-specific? Neuropsychologia, 46, 1211–1223.

  • Herron, J. E. (2007). Decomposition of the ERP late posterior negativity: Effects of retrieval and response fluency. Psychophysiology, 44, 233–244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herron, J. E., & Rugg, M. D. (2003). Strategic influences on recollection in the exclusion task: Electrophysiological evidence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 703–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York, NY: Henry Holt.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jang, Y., Wixted, J. T., Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Huber, D. E. (2012). Decomposing the interaction between retention interval and study/test practice: The role of retrievability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, M., & Mecklinger, A. (2003). The late posterior negativity in ERP studies of episodic memory: Action monitoring and retrieval of attribute conjunctions. Biological Psychology, 64, 91–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, M., Stenberg, G., Lindgren, M., & Rosén, I. (2002). Memory for perceived and imagined pictures: An event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia, 40, 986–1002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., Kounios, J., & Reeder, J. A. (1994). Time-course studies of reality monitoring and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1409–1419. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.6.1409

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. J., Kreiter, K., Russo, B., & Zhu, J. (1998). A spatio-temporal analysis of recognition-related event-related brain potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 29, 83–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science, 319, 966–968. doi:10.1126/science.1152408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langeslag, S. J. E., & van Strien, J. W. (2008). Age differences in the emotional modulation of ERP old/new effect. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 70, 105–114.

  • Leynes, P. A., Cairns, A., & Crawford, J. T. (2005). Event-related potentials indicate that reality monitoring differs from external source monitoring. American Journal of Psychology, 118, 497–524.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leynes, P. A., & Phillips, M. C. (2008). Event-related potential (ERP) evidence for varied recollection during source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 741–751.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leynes, P. A., & Zish, K. (2012). Event-related potential (ERP) evidence for fluency-based recognition memory. Neuropsychologia, 50, 3240–3249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride, D. M., & Abney, D. H. (2012). A comparison of transfer-appropriate processing and multi-process frameworks for prospective memory performance. Experimental Psychology, 59, 190–198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mecklinger, A., Johansson, M., Parra, M., & Hanslmayr, S. (2007). Source-retrieval requirements influence late ERP and EEG memory effects. Brain Research, 1172, 110–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mecklinger, A., von Cramon, D. Y., & Matthes-von Cramon, G. (1998). Event-related potential evidence for a specific recognition memory deficit in adult survivors of cerebral hypoxia. Brain, 121, 1919–1935. doi:10.1093/brain/121.10.1919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montaldi, D., & Mayes, A. R. (2010). The role of recollection and familiarity in the functional differentiation of the medial temporal lobes. Hippocampus, 20, 1291–1314. doi:10.1002/hipo.20853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80016-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nessler, D., Friedman, D., Johnson, R. J., & Bersick, M. (2007). Does repetition engender the same retrieval processes in young and older adults? NeuroReport, 18, 1837–1840.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olichney, J. M., Van Petten, C., Paller, K. A., Salmon, D. P., Iragui, V. J., & Kutas, M. (2000). Word repetition in amnesia: Electrophysiological measures of impaired and spared memory. Brain, 123, 1948–1963. doi:10.1093/brain/123.9.1948

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A., Rogers, T. B., & Smythe, P. C. (1968). Why are pictures easier to recall than words? Psychonomic Science, 11, 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paller, K. A., Hutson, C. A., Miller, B. B., & Boehm, S. G. (2003). Neural manifestations of memory with and without awareness. Neuron, 38, 507–516.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paller, K. A., Voss, J. L., & Boehm, S. G. (2007). Validating neural correlates of familiarity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 243–250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2009). Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory? Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 437–447. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, S. M., & Donaldson, D. I. (2008). Electrophysiological evidence for the effect of interactive imagery on episodic memory: Encouraging familiarity for non-unitized stimuli during associative recognition. NeuroImage, 39, 873–884. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III, & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 20–27. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosburg, T., Johansson, M., & Mecklinger, A. (2013). Strategic retrieval and retrieval orientation in reality monitoring studied by event-related potentials (ERPs). Neuropsychologia, 51, 557–571.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosburg, T., Mecklinger, A., & Johansson, M. (2011a). Electrophysiological correlates of retrieval orientation in reality monitoring. NeuroImage, 54, 3076–3084.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosburg, T., Mecklinger, A., & Johansson, M. (2011b). Strategic retrieval in a reality monitoring task. Neuropsychologia, 49, 2957–2969.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D., & Kornblum, S. (1982). A priming method for investigating the selection of motor responses. Acta Psychologica, 1, 223–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossion, B., & Pourtois, G. (2004). Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart’s object pictorial set: The role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception, 33, 217–236. doi:10.1068/p5117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rugg, M. D., & Curran, T. (2007). Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 251–257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rugg, M. D., Mark, R. E., Walla, P., Schloerscheidt, A. M., Birch, C. S., & Allan, K. (1998). Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory. Nature, 392, 595–598. doi:10.1038/33396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schloerscheidt, A. M., & Rugg, M. D. (2004). The impact of change in stimulus format on the electrophysiological indices of recognition. Neuropsychologia, 42, 451–466.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592–604. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.4.6.592

    Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174–215. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, B., Hanslmayr, S., Opitz, B., Mecklinger, A., & Bäuml, K.-H. (2009). Oscillatory correlates of retrieval-induced forgetting in recognition memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 976–990.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sprondel, V., Kipp, K. H., & Mecklinger, A. (2012). Electrophysiological evidence for late maturation of strategic episodic retrieval processes. Developmental Science, 15, 330–344.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stenberg, G., Hellman, J., Johansson, M., & Rosén, I. (2009). Familiarity or conceptual priming: Event-related potentials in name recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 447–460. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stenberg, G., Johansson, M., & Rosén, I. (2006). Conceptual and perceptual memory: Retrieval orientations reflected in event-related potentials. Acta Psychologica, 122, 174–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van den Broek, G. S. E., Takashima, A., Segers, E., Fernández, G., & Verhoeven, L. (2013). Neural correlates of testing effects in vocabulary learning. NeuroImage, 78, 94–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vilberg, K. L., & Rugg, M. D. (2009). Functional significance of retrieval-related activity in lateral parietal cortex: Evidence from fMRI and ERPs. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 1490–1501.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, J. L., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). FN400 potentials are functionally identical to N400 potentials and reflect semantic processing during recognition testing. Psychophysiology, 48, 532–546.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilding, E. L. (2000). In what way does the parietal ERP old/new effect index recollection? International Journal of Psychophysiology, 35, 81–87.

  • Wing, E. A., Marsh, E. J., & Cabeza, R. (2013). Neural correlates of retrieval-based memory enhancement: An fMRI study of the testing effect. Neuropsychologia, 51, 2360–2370.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, C. C., Hayama, H. R., & Rugg, M. D. (2006). Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity. Brain Research, 1100, 125–135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441–517. doi:10.1006/jmla.2002.2864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yonelinas, A. P., Aly, M., Wang, W. C., & Koen, J. D. (2010). Recollection and familiarity: Examining controversial assumptions and new directions. Hippocampus, 20, 1178–1194. doi:10.1002/hipo.20864

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, S. S., & Rugg, M. D. (2010). Dissociation of the electrophysiological correlates of familiarity strength and item repetition. Brain Research, 1320, 74–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author note

The research was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG; Grant No. Ro 3533/1-1). The authors greatly appreciate the technical assistance of Maxie Siebert, Hannah Heindrihoff, and Patrizia Schneider.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Experimental Neuropsychology Unit, Saarland University, Campus, Building A2.4, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany

    Timm Rosburg, Michael Weigl & Axel Mecklinger

  2. Department of Psychology, Neuropsychology Division, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

    Mikael Johansson

Authors
  1. Timm Rosburg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mikael Johansson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael Weigl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Axel Mecklinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timm Rosburg.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 15.8 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rosburg, T., Johansson, M., Weigl, M. et al. How does testing affect retrieval-related processes? An event-related potential (ERP) study on the short-term effects of repeated retrieval. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 15, 195–210 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-014-0310-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-014-0310-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation