Date: 14 Dec 2013
Gut estimates: Pregnant women adapt to changing possibilities for squeezing through doorways
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Possibilities for action depend on the fit between the body and the environment. Perceiving what actions are possible is challenging, because the body and the environment are always changing. How do people adapt to changes in body size and compression? In Experiment 1, we tested pregnant women monthly over the course of pregnancy to determine whether they adapted to changing possibilities for squeezing through doorways. As women gained belly girth and weight, previously passable doorways were no longer passable, but women’s decisions to attempt passage tracked their changing abilities. Moreover, their accuracy was equivalent to that of nonpregnant adults. In Experiment 2, nonpregnant adults wore a “pregnancy pack” that instantly increased the size of their bellies, and they judged whether doorways were passable. Accuracy in the “pregnant” participants was only marginally worse than that of actual pregnant women, suggesting that participants adapted to the prosthesis during the test session. In Experiment 3, participants wore the pregnancy pack and gauged passability before and after attempting passage. The judgments were grossly inaccurate prior to receiving feedback. These findings indicate that experience facilitates perceptual–motor recalibration for certain types of actions.
Adolph, K. E. (2008). The growing body in action: What infant locomotion tells us about perceptually guided action. In R. Klatzy, M. Behrmann, & B. MacWhinney (Eds.), Embodiment, ego-space, and action (pp. 275–321). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Adolph, K. E., & Joh, A. S. (2009). Multiple learning mechanisms in the development of action. In A. Woodward & A. Needham (Eds.), Learning and the infant mind (pp. 172–207). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Bingham, G. P., & Pagano, C. C. (1998). The necessity of a perception–action approach to definite distance perception: Monocular distance perception to guide reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 145–168.PubMed
Franchak, J. M., & Adolph, K. E. (2013). Affordances for action as probabilstic functions: Implications for development, perception, and decision-making. Ecological Psychology, (in press).
Fries, E. C., & Hellebrandt, F. A. (1943). The influence of pregnancy on the location of the center of gravity, postural stability, and body alignment. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 46, 374–380.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Higuchi, T., Takada, H., Matsuura, Y., & Imanaka, K. (2004). Visual estimation of spatial requirements for locomotion in novice wheelchair users. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 55–66.PubMed
Mark, L. S., Baillet, J. A., Craver, K. D., Douglas, S. D., & Fox, T. (1990). What an actor must do in order to perceive the affordance for sitting. Ecological Psychology, 2, 325–366.CrossRef
Murkoff, H., & Mazel, M. (2008). What to expect when you’re expecting (4th ed.). New York, NY: Workman.
Stoffregen, T. A., Yang, C., & Bardy, B. G. (2005). Affordance judgments and nonlocomotor body movement. Ecological Psychology, 17, 75–104.CrossRef
Stoffregen, T. A., Yang, C., Giveans, M. R., Flanagan, M., & Bardy, B. G. (2009). Movement in the perception of an affordance for wheelchair locomotion. Ecological Psychology, 21, 1–36.CrossRef
US Institute of Medicine, Committee on Nutritional Status During Pregnancy and Lactation. (1990). Nutrition during pregnancy: Part I, Weight gain. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Wagman, J. B., & Taylor, K. K. R. (2005). Perceiving affordances for aperture crossing for the person-plus-object system. Ecological Psychology, 17, 105–130.CrossRef
Warren, W. H., & Whang, S. (1987). Visual guidance of walking through apertures: Body-scaled information for affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 371–383.PubMed
Withagen, R., & Michaels, C. F. (2005). The role of feedback information for calibration and attunement in perceiving length by dynamic touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1379–1390.PubMed
Wu, W., Meijer, O. G., Lamoth, C. J., Uegaki, K., van Dieën, J. H., Wuisman, P. I., … Beek, P. J. (2004). Gait coordination in pregnancy: Transverse pelvic and thoracic rotations and their relative phase. Clinical Biomechanics, 19, 480–488.
- Gut estimates: Pregnant women adapt to changing possibilities for squeezing through doorways
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
Volume 76, Issue 2 , pp 460-472
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Perception and action
- Industry Sectors