Date: 06 Jun 2012
Effects of expectations on loudness and loudness difference
To determine how expectations affect loudness and loudness difference, in two experiments we induced some subjects to expect loud sounds (condition L), some to expect soft sounds (condition S), and others to have no particular expectations (control). In Experiment 1, all subjects estimated the loudnesses of the same set of three moderately loud 1-kHz tones. Estimates were greatest for subjects in condition S and smallest for subjects in condition L. Control subjects’ estimates were intermediate but closer to those of condition S subjects. In Experiment 2, subjects estimated the difference in loudness for pairs of moderately loud 1-kHz tones. Again, estimates were smallest for condition L subjects; estimates were greatest for control subjects, and condition S subjects’ estimates were closer to control estimates than to condition L estimates. This pattern of results is explainable by a combination of (1) Parducci’s (1995) range-frequency theory and (2) a gain control mechanism in the auditory system under top-down governance (Schneider, Parker, & Murphy, 2011).
Boltz, M. G. (1989). Time judgments of musical endings: Effects of expectancies on the “filled interval effect”. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 409–418.CrossRef
Boltz, M. G. (1993). Time estimation and expectancies. Memory & Cognition, 21, 853–863.CrossRef
Cardello, A. V., Melnick, S. M., & Rowan, P. A. (1996). Expectations as a mediating variable in context effects. In I. Taub & R. Bell (Eds.), Proceedings of the food preservation 2000 conference (Vol. 1, pp. 259–309). Hampton, VA: Science and Technology Corporation.
Cardello, A. V., & Sawyer, F. M. (1992). Effects of disconfirmed consumer expectations on food acceptability. Journal of Sensory Studies, 7, 253–277.CrossRef
Foley, H. J., Cross, D. V., Foley, M. A., & Reeder, R. (1983). Stimulus range, number of categories, and the “virtual” exponent. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 505–512.CrossRef
Guirao, M. (1991). A single scale based on ratio and partition estimates. In S. J. Bolanowski & G. A. Gescheider (Eds.), Ratio scaling of psychological magnitude: In honor of the memory of S. S. Stevens (pp. 59–78). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level theory: An experimental and systematic approach to behavior. New York: Harper & Row.
Jones, M. R., Boltz, M. G., & Klein, J. M. (1993). Expected endings and judged duration. Memory & Cognition, 21, 646–665.CrossRef
Le Prell, C. G., Dolan, D. F., Schacht, J., Miller, J. M., Lomax, M. I., & Altschuler, R. A. (2003). Pathways for protection from noise induced hearing loss. Noise & Health, 5, 1–17.
Marks, L. E., & Algom, D. (1998). Psychophysical scaling. In M. H. Birnbaum (Ed.), Handbook of perception and cognition (2/e): Measurement, judgment and decision making (pp. 81–178). New York: Academic Press.CrossRef
Mišić, B. V., Schneider, B. A., & McIntosh, A. R. (2010). Knowledge-driven contrast gain control is characterized by two distinct electrocortical markers. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3, 1–12. doi:10.3389neuro.09.078.2009
Nosofsky, R. (1983). Shifts of attention in the identification and discrimination of intensity. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 103–112.CrossRef
Olson, J. C., & Dover, P. A. (1979). Disconfirmation of consumer expectations through product trial. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 179–189.CrossRef
Parducci, A. (1974). Contextual effects: A range-frequency analysis. In E. C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of perception Volume II: Psychophysical judgment and measurement (pp.127–141). New York: Academic Press.
Parducci, A. (1995). Happiness, pleasure, and judgment: The contextual theory and its applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Parker, S., Murphy, D., & Schneider, B. (2002). Top-down gain control in the auditory system: Evidence from identification and discrimination experiments. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 598–615.CrossRef
Parker, S., & Schneider, B. (1994). The stimulus range effect: Evidence for top-down control of sensory intensity. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 1–11.CrossRef
Peak, H. (1955). Attitude and motivation. In M. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: 1955 (pp. 149–189). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Petzold, P. (1990). The influence of anchor stimuli on judgments of attributes. In H.-G. Geissler, M. H. Muller, & W. Prinz (Eds.), Psychophysical explorations of mental structures (pp. 138–146). Lewiston, NY: Hogrefe & Huber.
Schneider, B. A., & Parker, S. (1990). Does stimulus context affect loudness or only loudness judgments? Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 409–418.CrossRef
- Effects of expectations on loudness and loudness difference
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
Volume 74, Issue 6 , pp 1334-1342
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors