Abstract
A series of three visual search tasks revealed more efficient search for hostile than for peaceful faces among neutral face distractors. Given that this effect has been observed inconsistently in prior literature, meta-analytic methods were employed for evaluating data across three experiments in order to develop a more valid estimate of the potentially small effect size. Furthermore, in the present experiments, different emotional meanings were conditioned to identical faces across observers, thus eliminating confounds between the physical characteristics and the emotional valences of the face stimuli. On the basis of the present findings, we argue that the visual system is capable of determining a face's emotional valence before the face becomes the focus of attention, and that emotional valence can be used by the visual system to determine subsequent attention allocation. However, meta-analytic results indicate that emotional valence makes a relatively small contribution to search efficiency in the present search context.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Batty, M. J., Cave, K. R., & Pauli, P. (2005). Abstract stimuli associated with threat through conditioning cannot be detected preattentively. Emotion, 5, 418–430.
Beaver, J. D., Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (2005). Emotional conditioning to masked stimuli and modulation of visuospatial attention. Emotion, 5, 67–79.
Brown, V., Huey, D., & Findlay, J. M. (1997). Face detection in peripheral vision: Do faces pop out? Perception, 26, 1555–1570.
Byrne, A., & Eysenck, M. W. (1995). Trait anxiety, anxious mood, and threat detection. Cognition & Emotion, 9, 549–562.
Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433–458.
Eastwood, J. D., & Smilek, D. (2005). Functional consequences of perceiving facial expressions of emotion without awareness. Consciousness & Cognition, 14, 565–584.
Eastwood, J. D., Smilek, D., & Merikle, P. M. (2001). Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1004–1013.
Eastwood, J. D., Smilek, D., Oakman, J. M., Farvolden, P., van Ameringen, M., Mancini, C., & Merikle, P. M. (2005). Individuals with social phobia are biased to become aware of negative faces. Visual Cognition, 12, 159–179.
Fallshore, M., & Bartholow, J. (2003). Recognition of emotion from inverted schematic drawings of faces. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 96, 236–244.
Fazio, R. H. (1989). On the power and functionality of attitudes: The role of attitude accessibility. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.),Attitude structure and function (pp. 153–179). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fisher, R. A. (1928). Statistical methods for research workers (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.
Fox, E., & Damjanovic, L. (2006). The eyes are sufficient to produce a threat superiority effect. Emotion, 6, 534–539.
Fox, E., Lester, V., Russo, R., Bowles, R. J., Pichler, A., & Dutton, K. (2000). Facial expressions of emotion: Are angry faces detected more efficiently? Cognition & Emotion, 14, 61–92.
Frischen, A., Eastwood J. D., & Smilek D. (in press). Visual search for faces with emotional expressions. Psychological Bulletin.
Hampton, C., Purcell, D. G., Bersine, L., Hansen, C. H., & Hansen, R. D. (1989). Probing “pop-out”: Another look at the face-in-thecrowd effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 563–566.
Hansen, C. H., & Hansen, R. D. (1988). Finding the face in the crowd: An anger superiority effect. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 54, 917–924.
Horstmann, G., & Bauland, A. (2006). Search asymmetries with real faces: Testing the anger-superiority effect. Emotion, 6, 193–207.
Horstmann, G., Scharlau, I., & Ansorge, U. (2006). More efficient rejection of happy than of angry face distractors in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 1067–1073.
Juth, P., Lundqvist, D., Karlsson, A., & Öhman, A. (2005). Looking for foes and friends: Perceptual and emotional factors when finding a face in the crowd. Emotion, 5, 379–395.
Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & D. A. Davis (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 28–61). San Diego: Academic Press.
Koster, E. H. W., Crombez, G., Van Damme, S., Verschuere, B., & De Houwer, J. (2005). Signals for threat modulate attentional capture and holding: Fear-conditioning and extinction during the exogenous cueing task. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 771–780.
Lleras, A., & Von Mühlenen, A. (2004). Spatial context and top-down strategies in visual search. Spatial Vision, 17, 465–482.
Lundqvist, D., & Öhman, A. (2005). Emotion regulates attention: The relation between facial configurations, facial emotion, and visual attention. Visual Cognition, 12, 51–84.
Marcel, A. J. (1983). Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 197–237.
Martinez, A. M., & Benavente, R. (1998). The AR face database (Tech. Rep. No. 24). Barcelona, Spain: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Computer Vision Center.
McKelvie, S. J. (1995). Emotional expression in upside-down faces: Evidence for configurational and componential processing. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 325–334.
Nothdurft, H.-C. (1993). Faces and facial expressions do not pop out. Perception, 22, 1287–1298.
Öhman, A. (1993). Fear and anxiety as emotional phenomena: Clinical phenomenology, evolutionary perspectives, and informationprocessing mechanisms. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 511–536). New York: Guilford.
Öhman, A., Lundqvist, D., & Esteves, F. (2001). The face in the crowd revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 80, 381–396.
Purcell, D. G., & Stewart, A. L. (2006, May). The anger superiority effect: Confounds with schematic stimuli. Poster presented at the 18th Annual Meeting of the Association for Psychological Science, New York.
Purcell, D. G., Stewart, A. L., & Skov, R. B. (1996). It takes a confounded face to pop out of a crowd. Perception, 25, 1091–1108.
Reynolds, M. G., Eastwood, J. D., Partanen, M., Frischen, A., & Smilek, D. (in press). Monitoring eye movements while searching for affective faces. Visual Cognition.
Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (Rev. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., & Fazio, R. H. (1992). On the orienting value of attitudes: Attitude accessibility as a determinant of an object's attraction of visual attention. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 63, 198–211.
Schubö, A., Gendolla, G. H. E., Meinecke, C., & Abele, A. E. (2006). Detecting emotional faces and features in a visual search paradigm: Are faces special? Emotion, 6, 246–256.
Smilek, D., Dixon, M. J., & Merikle, P. M. (2006). Revisiting the category effect: The influence of meaning and search strategy on the efficiency of visual search. Brain Research, 1080, 73–90.
Smilek, D., Enns, J. T., Eastwood, J. D., & Merikle, P. M. (2006). Relax! Cognitive strategy influences visual search. Visual Cognition, 14, 543–564.
Smilek, D., Frischen, A., Reynolds, M. G., Gerritsen, C., & Eastwood, J. D. (2007). What influences visual search efficiency? Disentangling contributions of preattentive and postattentive processes. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 1105–1116.
Snodgrass, M., Shevrin, H., & Kopka, M. (1993). The mediation of intentional judgments by unconscious perceptions: The influence of task strategy, task preference, word meaning, and motivation. Consciousness & Cognition, 2, 169–193.
Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S., de Houwer, J., de Ruiter, K., Ajzenstzen, M., & Holland, S. (2004). AD/HD and the capture of attention by briefly exposed delay-related cues: Evidence from a conditioning paradigm. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 45, 274–283.
Stormark, K. M., Hugdahl, K., & Posner, M. I. (1999). Emotional modulation of attention orienting: A classical conditioning study. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 40, 91–99.
Suslow, T., Dannlowski, U., Lalee-Mentzel, J., Donges, U.-S., Arolt, V., & Kersting, A. (2004). Spatial processing of facial emotion in patients with unipolar depression: A longitudinal study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 83, 59–63.
Suslow, T., Junghanns, K., & Arolt, V. (2001). Detection of facial expressions of emotions in depression. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 92, 857–868.
Suslow, T., Roestel, C., Ohrmann, P., & Arolt, V. (2003). Detection of facial expressions of emotions in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 64, 137–145.
Thompson, P. (1980). Margaret Thatcher: A new illusion. Perception, 9, 483–484.
Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
Tsotsos, J. K. (1997). Limited capacity of any realizable perceptual system is a sufficient reason for attentive behavior. Consciousness & Cognition, 6, 429–436.
Van Damme, S., Crombez, G., Hermans, D., Koster, E. H. W., & Eccleston, C. (2006). The role of extinction and reinstatement in attentional bias to threat: A conditioning approach. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 44, 1555–1563.
Van Selst, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1993). Perception below the objective threshold? Consciousness & Cognition, 2, 194–203.
White, M. (1995). Preattentive analysis of facial expressions of emotion. Cognition & Emotion, 9, 439–460.
Williams, M. A., Moss, S. A., Bradshaw, J. L., & Mattingley, J. B. (2005). Look at me, I'm smiling: Visual search for threatening and nonthreatening facial expressions. Visual Cognition, 12, 29–50.
Wolfe, J. M. (1989). Visual search. In H. Pashler. (Ed.), Attention (pp. 13–73). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Wolfe, J. M. (1998). What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search? Psychological Science, 9, 33–39.
Wolfe, J. M. (2001). Asymmetries in visual search: An introduction. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 381–389.
Wolfe, J. M. (2003). Moving towards solutions to some enduring controversies in visual search. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 70–76.
Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 419–433.
Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 495–501.
Yasuda, T. (2005). Effects of configural information on face shape perception. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 76, 131–138.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gerritsen, C., Frischen, A., Blake, A. et al. Visual search is not blind to emotion. Perception & Psychophysics 70, 1047–1059 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.6.1047
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.6.1047