Abstract
When speech is rapidly alternated between the two ears, intelligibility declines as the rate of alternation approaches 3 to 5 switching cycles per second, and then, paradoxically, returns to a good level beyond that point. We tested intelligibility when shadowing was used as a response measure (Experiment 1), when recall was used as a response measure (Experiment 2), and when time-compression was used to vary the speech rate of the presented materials (Experiment 3). In spite of claims that older adults are generally slower in switching attention, younger and older adults did not differ in the critical alternation rates producing minimal intelligibility. We suggest that the point of minimal intelligibility in alternated speech reflects an interaction between (1) the rate of disruption induced by breaking the speech stream between two sound sources, (2) the amount of contextual information per ear, and (3) the size of the silent gaps separating the speech elements that must be perceptually bridged.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, N. D., Craik, F. I. M., & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1998). The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 1. Evidence from divided attention costs. Psychology & Aging, 13, 405–423.
Benjamin, B. J. (1997). Speech production of normally aging adults. Seminars in Speech & Language, 18, 135–141.
Bergman, M. (1980). Aging and the perception of speech. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cerella, J. (1994). Generalized slowing in Brinley plots. Journal of Gerontology, 49, P65-P71.
Cherry, E. C., & Taylor, W. K. (1954). Some further experiments upon the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 554–559.
Gordon-Salant, S., & Fitzgibbons, P. J. (1993). Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 36, 1276–1285.
Hall, J. W., & Mueller, H. G. (1997). Audiologists’ desk reference (Vol. 1). San Diego: Singular.
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2000). Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 131–138.
Huggins, A. W. F. (1964). Distortion of the temporal pattern of speech: Interruption and alternation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 36, 1055–1064.
Huggins, A. W. F. (1967). Distortion of the temporal patterns of speech by syllable-tied alternation. Language & Speech, 10, 133–140.
Huggins, A. W. F. (1971, August). Perception of temporally segmented speech. Paper presented at the 7th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Montreal.
Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Macken, W. J., Tremblay, S., Houghton, R. J., Nicholls, A. P., & Jones, D. M. (2003). Does auditory streaming require attention? Evidence from attentional selectivity in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 43–51.
Miller, G. A., & Licklider, J. C. R. (1950). The intelligibility of interrupted speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, 167–173.
Morrell, C. H., Gordon-Salant, S., Pearson, J. D., Brant, L. J., & Fozard, J. L. (1996). Age- and gender-specific reference ranges for hearing level and longitudinal changes in hearing level. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 1949–1967.
Neisser, U. (1966). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Panek, P. E., & Rush, M. C. (1981). Simultaneous examination of age related differences in the ability to maintain and reorient auditory selective attention. Experimental Aging Research, 7, 405–416.
Pichora-Fuller, M. K., & Souza, P. E. (2003). Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech. International Journal of Audiology, 42, 2S11–2S16.
Rupf, J. A., Hughes, G. W., & House, A. S. (1971). Speech-synchronized versus periodic interaural switching of speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 608–610.
Salthouse, T. A. (1991). Theoretical perspectives on cognitive aging. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403–428.
Samuel, A. G. (1991). Perceptual degradation due to signal alternation: Implications for auditory pattern processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 392–403.
Schneider, B. A., & Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2000). Implications of perceptual deterioration for cognitive aging research. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), Handbook of aging and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 155–220). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schneider, W., Dumais, S. T., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). Automatic and control processing and attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 1–27). San Diego: Academic Press.
Schubert, E. D., & Parker, C. D. (1955). Addition to Cherry’s findings on switching speech between the two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 792–794.
Scott, S. K., & Johnsrude, I. S. (2003). The neuroanatomical and functional organization of speech perception. Trends in Neurosciences, 26, 100–107.
Smith, B. L., Wasowicz, J., & Preston, J. (1987). Temporal characteristics of the speech of normal elderly adults. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 30, 522–529.
Speaks, C., & Trooien, T. T. (1974). Interaural alternation and speech intelligibility. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 56, 640–644.
Sussman, E., čeponiené, R., Shestakova, A., Näätänen, R., & Winkler, I. (2001). Auditory stream segregation processes operate similarly in school-aged children and adults. Hearing Research, 153, 108–114.
Tun, P. A., Wingfield, A., Stine, E. A. L., & Mecsas, C. (1992). Rapid speech processing and divided attention: Processing rate versus processing resources as an explanation of age effects. Psychology & Aging, 7, 546–550.
Verhaeghen, P. (2003). Aging and vocabulary scores: A meta-analysis. Psychology & Aging, 18, 332–339.
Verhaeghen, P., & Basak, C. (2005). Ageing and switching of the focus of attention in working memory: Results from a modified N-Back task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 134–154.
Waugh, N. C., & Barr, R. A. (1980). Memory and mental tempo. In L. W. Poon, J. L. Fozard, L. S. Cermak, D. Arenberg, & L. W. Thompson (Eds.), New directions in memory and aging: Proceedings of the George A. Talland Memorial Conference (pp. 251–260). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wingfield, A. (1977). The perception of alternated speech. Brain & Language, 4, 219–230.
Wingfield, A., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2000). Language and speech. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), Handbook of aging and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 359–416). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wingfield, A., Tun, P. A., Koh, C. K., & Rosen, M. J. (1999). Regaining lost time: Adult aging and the effect of time restoration on recall of time-compressed speech. Psychology & Aging, 14, 380–389.
Wingfield, A., & Wheale, J. L. (1975a). Interaural alternation, information load, and speech intelligibility. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 57, 1219–1220.
Wingfield, A., & Wheale, J. L. (1975b). Word rate and intelligibility of alternated speech. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 317–320.
Zachary, R. (1986). Shipley Institute of Living Scale (Rev. ed.). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NIH Grant AG19714 from the National Institute on Aging.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stewart, R., Yetton, E. & Wingfield, A. Perception of alternated speech operates similarly in young and older adults with age-normal hearing. Perception & Psychophysics 70, 337–345 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.2.337
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.2.337