Abstract
An eyetracking experiment is reported examining the assumption that a word is skipped during sentence reading because parafoveal processing during preceding fixations has reached an advanced level in recognizing that word. Word n was presented with reduced contrast, with case alternation, or normally. Reingold and Rayner (2006) reported that, in comparison to the normal condition, reduced contrast increased viewing times on word n but not on word n+1, whereas case alternation increased viewing times on both words. These patterns were reflected in the fixation times of the present experiment, but a striking dissociation was observed in the skipping of word n+1: The reduced contrast of word n decreased skipping of word n+1, whereas case alternation did not. Apart from the amount of parafoveal processing, the decision to skip word n+1 is also influenced by the ease of processing word n: Difficulties in processing word n lead to a more conservative strategy in the decision to skip word n+1.
Article PDF
References
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The Celex Lexical Database (Release 1) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
Besner, D., & Roberts, M. A. (2003). Reading nonwords aloud: Results requiring change in the dual route cascaded model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 398–404.
Brysbaert, M., Drieghe, D., & Vitu, F. (2005). Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading. In G. Under wood (Ed.), Cognitive processes in eye guidance (pp. 53–77). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Drieghe, D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2005). Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 954–969.
Drieghe, D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2008). Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1239–1249.
Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E. M., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777–813.
Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 417–429.
Herdman, C. M., Chernecki, D., & Norris, D. (1999). Naming cAsE aLtErNaTeD words. Memory & Cognition, 27, 254–266.
Kliegl, R., & Engbert, R. (2005). Fixation durations before word skipping in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 132–138.
Nuthmann, A., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2005). Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 45, 2201–2217.
Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (2006). Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye movement control. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 1–56.
Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65–81.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422.
Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125–157.
Reingold, E. M., & Rayner, K. (2006). Examining the word identification stages hypothesized by the E-Z Reader model. Psychological Science, 17, 742–746.
White, S. J. (2007). Foveal load and parafoveal processing: The case of word skipping. In R. P. G. van Gompel, M. H. Fischer, W. S. Murray, & R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 409–424). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Drieghe, D. Foveal processing and word skipping during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, 856–860 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.4.856
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.4.856