Abstract
In three experiments, we examined the effect of response-outcome relations on human ratings of causal efficacy and demonstrated that such efficacy ratings transfer to novel situations through derived stimulus relations. Causal efficacy ratings were higher, and probability of an outcome given a response was lower, for a differential reinforcement of high rate schedule than for either a differential reinforcement of low rate schedule (Experiment 1) or a variable interval schedule (Experiment 2). In Experiment 3, we employed schedules that were equated for outcome probability and noted that ratings of causal efficacy and the rate of response were higher on a variable ratio than on a variable interval schedule. For participants in all three experiments, causal efficacy ratings transferred to the stimulus present during each schedule and generalized to novel stimuli through derived relations. The results corroborate the view that schedules are a determinant of both response rates and causal efficacy ratings. In addition, the novel demonstration of a mechanism of generalization of these ratings via derived relations has clinical implications.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allan, L. G. (1980). A note on measurement of contingency between two binary variables in judgment tasks. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15, 147–149.
Alloy, L. B., & Abramson, L. Y. (1979). Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 441–485. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.108.4.441
Baeyens, F., Eelen, P., Van den Bergh, O., & Crombez, G. (1990). Flavor-flavor and color-flavor conditioning in humans. Learning á Motivation, 21, 434–455. doi:10.1016/0023-9690(90)90025-J
Baron, A., Kaufman, A., & Stauber, K. A. (1969). Effects of instructions and reinforcement feedback on human operant behavior maintained by fixed-interval reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 701–712. doi:10.1901/jeab.1969.12-701
Baum, W. M. (1973). The correlational-based law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 20, 137–153. doi:10.1901/jeab.1973.20-137
Beck, A. T. (1978). The depression inventory. Philadelphia: Center for Cognitive Therapy.
Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.
Bush, K. M., Sidman, M., & de Rose, T. (1989). Contextual control of emergent equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 29–45. doi:10.1901/jeab.1989.51-29
De Houwer, J., Thomas, S., & Baeyens, F. (2001). Associative learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 853–869.
Dymond, S., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2000). Understanding complex behavior: The transformation of stimulus functions. Behavior Analyst, 23, 239–254.
Fulcher, E. P., Mathews, A., Mackintosh, B., & Law, S. (2001). Evaluative learning and the allocation of attention to emotional stimuli. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 25, 261–280. doi:10.1023/A:1010732328104
Hermans, D. (1998). Evaluative conditioning. Gedragstherapie, 31, 3–6.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1964). Secondary reinforcement and rate of primary reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 7, 27–36. doi:10.1901/jeab.1964.7-27
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaption. New York: Oxford University Press.
Levey, A. B., & Martin, I. (1975). Classical conditioning of human “evaluative” responses. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 13, 221–226. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(75)90026-1
Maldonado, A., Martos, R., & Ramirez, E. (1991). Human judgements of control: The interaction of the current contingency and previous controllability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43B, 347–360. doi:10.1080/14640749108401274
Morgan, J., & Banerjee, R. (2006). Social anxiety and self-evaluation of social performance in a nonclinical sample of children. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 35, 292–301.
Nevin, J. A., Grace, R. C., Holland, S., & McLean, A. P. (2001). Variable-ratio versus variable-interval schedules: Response rate, resistance to change, and preference. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 43–74. doi:10.1901/jeab.2001.76-43
Osman, M., & Shanks, D. R. (2005). Individual differences in causal learning and decision making. Acta Psychologica, 120, 93–112. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.04.003
Peele, D. B., Casey, J., & Silberberg, A. (1984). Primacy of interresponse-time reinforcement in accounting for rates under variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 149–167. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.10.2.149
Raia, C. P., Shillingford, S. W., Miller, H. L., & Baier, P. S. (2000). Interaction of procedural factors in human performance on yoked schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 265–281. doi:10.1901/jeab.2000.74-265
Reed, P. (1994). Influence of the cost of responding on human causality judgments. Memory & Cognition, 22, 243–248.
Reed, P. (1999). Effect of perceived cost on judgments regarding the efficacy of investment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20, 657–676. doi:10.1016/S0167-4870(99)00029-X
Reed, P. (2001a). Human response rates and causality judgments on schedules of reinforcement. Learning & Motivation, 32, 332–348. doi:10.1006/ lmot.2001.1085
Reed, P. (2001b). Schedules of reinforcement as determinants of human causality judgments and response rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 187–195.
Reed, P. (2003). Human causality judgments and response rates on DRL and DRH schedules of reinforcement. Learning & Behavior, 31, 205–211.
Reed, P. (2007). Response rate and sensitivity to the molar feedback function relating response and reinforcement rate on VI+ schedules of reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33, 428–439. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.33.4.428
Reed, P., Frasquillo, F., Colkin, C., Liemann, V., & Colbert, S. (2001). Interference with judgements of control and learning as a result of prior exposure to controllable and uncontrollable feedback during concept-learning tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54B, 167–183. doi:10.1080/02724990042000155
Rozin, P., Markwith, M., & McCauley, C. (1994). Sensitivity to indirect contacts with other persons: AIDS aversion as a composite of aversion to strangers, infection, moral taint, and misfortune. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 495–504. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.103.3.495
Scherer, K. R. (1993). Neuroscience projections to current debates in emotion psychology. Cognition & Emotion, 7, 1–41.
Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 14, 5–13.
Sidman, M. (1990). Equivalence relations: Where do they come from? In D. E. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behavior analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 93–114). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.
Sidman, M., Kirk, B., & Wilson-Morris, M. (1985). Six-member stimulus classes generated by conditional-discrimination procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 21–42. doi:10.1901/jeab.1985.43-21
Staunton, C., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2004). Relational frame theory, semantic priming and event related potentials: Building bridges between cognitive neuroscience and behavioural psychology. Irish Psychologist, 30, 96–102.
Stuart, E. W., Shimp, T. A., & Engle, R. W. (1987). Classical conditioning of consumer attitudes: Four experiments in an advertising context. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 334–351.
Walther, E., Nagengast, B., & Trasselli, C. (2005). Evaluative conditioning in social psychology: Facts and speculations. Cognition á Emotion, 19, 175–196. doi:10.1080/02699930441000274
Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151
Zellner, D. A., Rozin, P., Aron, M., & Kulish, C. (1983). Conditioned enhancement of human’s liking for flavor by pairing with sweetness. Learning & Motivation, 14, 338–350. doi:10.1016/0023-9690(83)90021-8
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The research described here was supported by a research grant from the United Kingdom Economic and Social Research Council.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dack, C., McHugh, L. & Reed, P. Generalization of causal efficacy judgments after evaluative learning. Learning & Behavior 37, 336–348 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/LB.37.4.336
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/LB.37.4.336