RTbox: A device for highly accurate response time measurements
Although computer keyboards and mice are frequently used in measuring response times (RTs), the accuracy of these measurements is quite low. Specialized RT collection devices must be used to obtain more accurate measurements. However, all the existing devices have some shortcomings. We have developed and implemented a new, commercially available device, the RTbox, for highly accurate RT measurements. The RTbox has its own microprocessor and high-resolution clock. It can record the identities and timing of button events with high accuracy, unaffected by potential timing uncertainty or biases during data transmission and processing in the host computer. It stores button events until the host computer chooses to retrieve them. The asynchronous storage greatly simplifies the design of user programs. The RTbox can also receive and record external signals as triggers and can measure RTs with respect to external events. The internal clock of the RTbox can be synchronized with the computer clock, so the device can be used without external triggers. A simple USB connection is sufficient to integrate the RTbox with any standard computer and operating system.
This research was supported by NEI and NIMH.
Arieh, Y., & Marks, L. E. (2008). Cross-modal interaction between vision and hearing: A speed-accuracy analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 412–421.CrossRef
Brainard, D. H., Pelli, D. G., & Robson, T. (2002). Display characterization. In J. P. Hornak (Ed.), Encyclopedia of imaging science and technology (pp. 172–188). New York: Wiley.
Chambers, C. D., & Brown, M. (2003). Timing accuracy under Microsoft Windows revealed through external chronometry. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 96–108.CrossRef
De Clercq, A., Crombez, G., Buysse, A., & Roeyers, H. (2003). A simple and sensitive method to measure timing accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 109–115.CrossRef
Dosher, B. A. (1976). The retrieval of sentences from memory: A speed-accuracy study. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 291–310.CrossRef
Jastrow, J. (1890). The time relations of mental phenomena. New York: Hodges.
Lu, H., Morrison, R. G., Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (2006). Role of gamma-band synchronization in priming of form discrimination for multiobject displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 610–617.CrossRef
Luce, R. D. (1991). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
McKinney, C. J., MacCormac, E. R., & Welsh-Bohmer, K. A. (1999). Hardware and software for tachistoscopy: How to make accurate measurements on any PC utilizing the Microsoft Windows operating system. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 129–136.CrossRef
Plant, R. R., Hammond, N., & Turner, G. (2004). Self-validating presentation and response timing in cognitive paradigms: How and why? Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 291–303.CrossRef
Plant, R. R., Hammond, N., & Whitehouse, T. (2003). How choice of mouse may affect response timing in psychological studies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 276–284.CrossRef
Shimizu, H. (2002). Measuring keyboard response delays by comparing keyboard and joystick inputs. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 250–256.CrossRef
Yap, M. J., Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., & Watson, J. M. (2006). Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: Insights from response time distributional analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 1324–1344.CrossRef
- RTbox: A device for highly accurate response time measurements
Behavior Research Methods
Volume 42, Issue 1 , pp 212-225
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, 90089-1061, Los Angeles, CA
- 2. University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
- 3. Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- 4. Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany