Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations
Researchers often hypothesize moderated effects, in which the effect of an independent variable on an outcome variable depends on the value of a moderator variable. Such an effect reveals itself statistically as an interaction between the independent and moderator variables in a model of the outcome variable. When an interaction is found, it is important to probe the interaction, for theories and hypotheses often predict not just interaction but a specific pattern of effects of the focal independent variable as a function of the moderator. This article describes the familiar pick-a-point approach and the much less familiar Johnson-Neyman technique for probing interactions in linear models and introduces macros for SPSS and SAS to simplify the computations and facilitate the probing of interactions in ordinary least squares and logistic regression. A script version of the SPSS macro is also available for users who prefer a point-and-click user interface rather than command syntax.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2005). Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: Inferential and graphical techniques. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 373–400.CrossRef
Bissonnette, V., Ickes, W., Bernstein, I., & Knowles, E. (1990). Personality moderating variables: A warning about statistical artifact and a comparison of analytic techniques. Journal of Personality, 58, 567–587.CrossRef
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cronbach, L. J. (1987). Statistical tests for moderator variables: Flaws in analyses recently proposed. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 414–417.CrossRef
Darlington, R. B. (1990). Regression and linear models. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hayes, A. F. (2005). Statistical methods for communication science. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Irwin, J. R., & McClelland, G. H. (2001). Misleading heuristics and moderated multiple regression models. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 100–109.CrossRef
Jaccard, J., & Turrisi, R. (2003). Interaction effects in multiple regression (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Johnson, P. O., & Neyman, J. (1936). Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application to some educational problems. Statistical Research Memoirs, 1, 57–93.
Karpman, M. B. (1983). The Johnson-Neyman technique using SPSS or BMDP. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 43, 137–147.CrossRef
Karpman, M. B. (1986). Comparing two non-parallel regression lines with the parametric alternative to analysis of covariance using SPSS-X or SAS—the Johnson-Neyman technique. Educational & Psychologicals Measurement, 46, 639–644.CrossRef
Kromrey, J. D., & Foster-Johnson, L. (1998). Mean centering in moderated multiple regression: Much ado about nothing. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 58, 42–67.CrossRef
Newsom, J. T., Prigerson, H. G., Schulz, R., & Reynolds, C. F., III (2003). Investigating moderator hypotheses in aging research: Statistical, methodological, and conceptual difficulties with comparing separate regressions. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 57, 119–150.CrossRef
O’Connor, B. P. (1998). SIMPLE: All-in-one programs for exploring interactions in moderated multiple regression. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 58, 836–840.CrossRef
Potthoff, R. F. (1964). On the Johnson-Neyman technique and some extensions thereof. Psychometrika, 29, 241–256.CrossRef
Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational & Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448.CrossRef
Reineke, J. B., & Hayes, A. F. (2007, November). Reporting on campaign finance success: Effects on perceptions of political candidates. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago.
Rogosa, D. (1980). Comparing nonparallel regression lines. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 307–321.CrossRef
Stone-Romero, E. F., & Anderson, L. E. (1994). Relative power of moderated multiple regression and the comparison of subgroup correlation coefficients for detecting moderator effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 354–359.CrossRef
- Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations
Behavior Research Methods
Volume 41, Issue 3 , pp 924-936
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors