Effects of positive and negative requests on compliance following transgression
Fifty Ss were assigned randomly to four cells of a 2 by 2 factorial design. Half the Ss were induced to transgress by cheating on a multiple-choice psychology test, while half the Ss did not transgress. Following the transgression manipulation, 28 of the Ss from each of the above conditions were asked to circulate a petition
- Aronson, E. The theory of cognitive dissonance: A current perspective. In L Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 4. New York: Academic Press, 1969. Pp. 1–34.
- Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. When does a harm-doer compensate a victim? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1967, 6, 435–441. CrossRef
- Carlsmith, J. M., & Gross, A. E. Some effects of guilt on compliance. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1969, 11, 232–239. CrossRef
- Freedman, J. L., Wallington, S. A., & Bless, E. Compliance without pressure: The effect of guilt. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1967, 7, 117–124. CrossRef
- McMillen, D. L. Transgression, self-image and compliant behavior. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1971 20, 176–179. CrossRef
- McMillen, D. L., & Austin, J. B. Effect of positive feedback on compliance following transgression. Psychonomic Science, 1971, 24, 59–61.
- Mills, J. Changes in moral attitudes following temptation. Journal of Personality, 1958, 26, 517–531. CrossRef
- Wallace, J., & Sadalla, E. Behavioral consequences of transgression: I. The effects of social recognition. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1966, 1, 187–194.
- Effects of positive and negative requests on compliance following transgression
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society
Volume 3, Issue 1 , pp 80-82
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Additional Links