Abstract
The concept of subliminal perception has been a subject of interest and controversy for decades. Of interest in the present investigation was whether a neurophysiologic index of stimulus change could be elicited to speech sound contrasts that were consciously indiscriminable. The stimuli were chosen on the basis of each individual subject’s discrimination threshold. The speech stimuli (which varied along anF3 onset frequency continuum from /da/ to /ga/) were synthesized so that the acoustical properties of the stimuli could be tightly controlled. Subthreshold and suprathreshold stimuli were chosen on the basis of behavioral ability demonstrated during psychophysical testing. A significant neural representation of stimulus change, reflected by the mismatch negativity response, was obtained in all but 1 subject in response to subthreshold stimuli. Grand average responses differed significantly from responses obtained in a control condition consisting of physiologic responses elicited by physically identical stimuli. Furthermore, responses to suprathreshold stimuli (close to threshold) did not differ significantly from subthreshold responses with respect to latency, amplitude, or area. These results suggest that neural representation of consciously imperceptible stimulus differences occurs and that this representation occurs at a preattentive level.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaltonen, O., Niemj, P., Nyrke, T., &Tuhkanen, M. (1987). Event-related brain potentials and the perception of a phonetic continuum.Biological Psychology,24, 197–207.
Alho, K. (1995). Cerebral generators of mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic counterpart (MMNm) elicited by sound changes.Ear & Hearing,16, 38–51.
Borgeat, F., Boissonneault, J., &Chaloult, L. (1989). Psychophysical responses to subliminal auditory suggestions for activation.Perceptual & Motor Skills,69, 947–953.
Bradlow, A. R., Pisoni, D. B., Akahane-Yamada, R., &Tohkura, Y. (1997). Training Japanese listeners to identify English Irl and III: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,101, 2299–2310.
Carrell, T. D. Bradlow, A. R., Nicol, T. G., Koch, D. B., &Kraus, N. (1999). Interactive software for evaluating auditory discrimination.Ear & Hearing,20, 175–176.
Chakalis, E., &Lowe, G. (1992). Positive effects of subliminal stimulation on memory.Perceptual & Motor Skills,74, 956–958.
Comerchero, M. D., &Polich, J. (1998). P3a, perceptual distinctiveness, and stimulus modality.Brain Research: Cognitive Brain Research,7, 41–48.
Csépe, V., Karmos, G., &Molnar, M. (1987). Evoked potential correlates of stimulus deviance during wakefulness and sleep in the catanimal model of mismatch negativity.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,66, 571–578.
Dixon, N. F. (1981).Preconsciousprocessing. New York: Wiley.
Escera, C, Alho, K., Winkler, I., &Näätänen, R. (1998). Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,10, 590–604.
Escera, C., &Grau, C. (1996). Short-term replicability of the mismatch negativity.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,100, 549–554.
Flege, J. E. (1995). Two procedures for training a novel second language phonetic contrast.Applied Psycholinguistics,16, 425–442.
Fried, I., Macdonald, K. A., &Wilson, C. L. (1997). Single neuron activity in human hippocampus and amygdala during recognition of faces and objects.Neuron,18, 753–765.
Frodl-Bauch, T., Kathmann, N., Moller, H. J., &Hegerl, U. (1997). Dipole localization and test-retest reliability of frequency and duration mismatch negativity generator processes.Brain Topography,10, 3–8.
Godfrey, J. J., Syrdal-Lasky, A. K., Millay, K. K., &Knox, C. M. (1981). Performance of dyslexic children on speech perception tests.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,32, 401–424.
Hoffman, J. E., Houck, M. R., Macmillan, F. W., III, Simons, R. F., &Oatman, L. (1985). Event-related potentials elicited by automatic targets: A dual-task analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 50–61.
Holender, D. (1986). Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,9, 1–66.
Jamieson, D. G., &Morosan, D. E. (1986). Training non-native speech contrasts in adults: Acquisition of the English ∂-θ/ contrast by francophones.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 205–215.
Jasper, H. H. (1958). The ten-twenty electrode system of the international federation.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,15, 115–117.
Javitt, D. C, Steinschneider, M., Schroeder, C. E., Vaughan, H. G., Jr., &Arezzo, J. C. (1994). Detection of stimulus deviance within primate primary auditory cortex: Intracortical mechanisms of mismatch negativity (MMN) generation.Brain Research,667, 192–200.
Kane, N. M., Curry, S. H., Rowlands, C. A., Manara, A. R., Lewis, T., Moss, T., Cummins, B. H., &Butler, S. R. (1996). Eventrelated potentials: Neurophysiological tools for predicting emergence and early outcome from traumatic coma.Intensive Care Medicine,22, 39–46.
Kaukoranta, E., Sams, M., Hari, R., Hämäläinen, M., &Näätänen, R. (1989). Reactions of human auditory cortex to changes in tone duration: Indirect evidence for duration specific neurons.Hearing Research,41, 15–22.
Klatt, D. (1980). Software for cascade/parallel formant synthesizer.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,67, 971–995.
Kotze, H. F., &Moller, A. T. (1990). Effect of auditory subliminal stimulation on GSR.Psychological Reports,67, 931–934.
Kraus, N., Koch, D. B., Mcgee, T. J., Nicol, T. G., &Cunningham, J. (1999). Speech-sound discrimination in school-age children: Psychophysical and neurophysiologic measures.Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research,42, 1042–1060.
Kraus, N., Mcgee, T. J., Carrell, T. D., King, C, Littman, T., &Nicol, T. G. (1994). Discrimination of speech-like contrasts in the auditory thalamus and cortex.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,96, 2758–2768.
Kraus, N., Mcgee, T. J., Carrell, T. D., &Sharma, A. (1995). Neurophysiologic bases of speech discrimination.Ear & Hearing,16, 19–37.
Kraus, N., Mcgee, T. J., Carrell, T. D., Zecker, S. G., Nicol, T. G., &Koch, D. B. (1996). Auditory neurophysiologic responses and discrimination deficits in children with learning problems.Science,273, 971–973.
Kraus, N., Mcgee, T. J., Littman, T., Nicoi, T. G., &King, C. (1994). Nonprimary auditory thalamic representation of acoustic change.Journal of Neurophysiology,72, 1270–1277.
Kraus, N., Mcgee, T. J., Micro, A., Sharma, A., Carrell, T. D., &Nicol, T. G. (1993). Mismatch negativity in school-age children to speech stimuli that are just perceptibly different.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,88, 123–130.
Kraus, N., Mcgee, T. J., Sharma, A., Carrell, T. D., &Nicol, T. G. (1992). Mismatch negativity event-related potential elicited by speech stimuli.Ear & Hearing,13, 158–164.
Lang, W., Lang, M., Heise, B., Deecke, L., &Kornhuber, H. H. (1984). Brain potentials related to voluntary hand tracking, motivation and attention.Human Neurobiology,3, 235–240.
Logan, J., &Pruitt, J. (1995). Methodological issues in training listeners to perceive non-native phonemes. In W. Strange (Ed.),Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language speech research (pp. 351–378). Timonium, MD: York Press.
Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (1991).Detection theory: A user’s guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mcgee, T. J., Kraus, N., &Nicol, T. G. (1997). Is it really a mismatch negativity? An assessment of methods for determining response validity in individual subjects.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,104, 359–368.
Näätänen, R. (1990). The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related brain potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,13, 201–233.
Näätänen, R. (1991). Mismatch negativity outside a strong attentional focus: A commentary on Woldorff et al.Psychophysiology,28, 478–484.
Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A. W., &Mantysalo, S. (1978). Early selective attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted.Acta Psychologie,42, 313–329.
Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K., &Sams, M. (1989). Do event-related potentials reveal the mechanism of the auditory sensory memory in the human brain?Neuroscience Letters,98, 217–221.
Näätänen, R., &Picton, T. W. (1987). The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure.Psychophysiology,24, 375–425.
Novak, G., Ritter, W., Vaughan, H. G., Jr., &Wiznitzer, M. L. (1990). Differentiation of negative event-related potentials in an auditory discrimination task.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,73, 255–275.
Pekkonen, E., Rinne, T., &Näätänen, R. (1995). Variability and replicability of the mismatch negativity.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,96, 546–554.
Polich, J. (1988). Bifurcated P300 peaks: P3a and P3b revisited?Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology,5, 287–294.
Sams, M., Kaukoranta, E., Hämäläinen, M., &Näätänen, R. (1991). Cortical activity elicited by changes in auditory stimuli: Different sources for the magnetic N100m and mismatch responses.Psychophysiology,28, 21–29.
Sams, M., Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., &Näätänen, R. (1985). Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,62, 437–448.
Sharma, A., Kraus, N., Mcgee, T. J., Carrell, T. D., &Nicol, T. G. (1993). Acoustic versus phonetic representation of speech as reflected by the mismatch negativity event-related potential.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,88, 64–71.
Skrandies, W., &Jedynak, A. (1999). Learning to see 3-D: Psychophysics and brain electrical activity.NeuroReport,10, 249–253.
Squires, N. K., Squires, K. C., &Hillyard, S. A. (1975). Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man.Electroencephalographv & Clinical Neurophysiology,38, 387–401.
Strange, W., &Dittmann, S. (1984). Effects of discrimination training on the perception of /r/-/l/ by Japanese adults learning English.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 131–145.
Tallal, P., &Stark, R. E. (1981). Speech acoustic-cue discrimination abilities of normally developing and language-impaired children.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,69, 568–574.
Taylor, M.M., &Creelman, C. D. (1967). PEST: Efficient estimates on probability functions.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,41, 782–787.
Tervaniemi, M., Lehtokoski, A., Sinkkonen, J., Virtanen, J., Ilmoniemi, R. J., &Näätänen, R. (1999) Test-retest reliability of mismatch negativity for duration, frequency and intensity changes.Clinical Neurophysiology,110, 1388–1393.
Tiitinen, H., May, P., Reinikainen, K., &Näätänen, R. (1994). Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory.Nature,372, 90–92.
Tremblay, K., Kraus, N., Carrell, T. D., &McGee, T. (1997). Central auditory system plasticity: Generalization to novel stimuli following listening training.Journal of the Acoustical Society of Amerca,102, 3762–3773.
Tremblay, K., Kraus, N., &McGee, T. (1998). The time course of auditory perceptual learning: Neurophysiologic changes during speechsound training.NeuroReport,9, 3557–3560.
Werker, J. F., &Tees, R. C. (1987). Speech perception in severely disabled and average reading children.Canadian Journal of Psychology,41, 48–61.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NIH-NIDCD-DC 01510.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Allen, J., Kraus, N. & Bradlow, A. Neural representation of consciously imperceptible speech sound differences. Perception & Psychophysics 62, 1383–1393 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212140
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212140