Abstract
To test the effect of linguistic experience on the perception of a cue that is known to be effective in distinguishing between [r] and [l] in English, 21 Japanese and 39 American adults were tested on discrimination of a set of synthetic speech-like stimuli. The 13 “speech” stimuli in this set varied in the initial stationary frequency of the third formant (F3) and its subsequent transition into the vowel over a range sufficient to produce the perception of [r a] and [l a] for American subjects and to produce [r a] (which is not in phonemic contrast to [l a ]) for Japanese subjects. Discrimination tests of a comparable set of stimuli consisting of the isolated F3 components provided a “nonspeech” control. For Americans, the discrimination of the speech stimuli was nearly categorical, i.e., comparison pairs which were identified as different phonemes were discriminated with high accuracy, while pairs which were identified as the same phoneme were discriminated relatively poorly. In comparison, discrimination of speech stimuli by Japanese subjects was only slightly better than chance for all comparison pairs. Performance on nonspeech stimuli, however, was virtually identical for Japanese and American subjects; both groups showed highly accurate discrimination of all comparison pairs. These results suggest that the effect of linguistic experience is specific to perception in the “speech mode.”
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference Notes
Fujisaki. H., & Kawashima, T.On the modes and mechanisms of speech perception. Research on Information Processing, Annual Report No. 2, University of Tokyo, Division of Electrical Engineering, Engineering Research Institute, 1969, 67–73.
Miyawaki, K.A preliminary study of American English /r/ by use of dynamic palatography. Annual Bulletin, Research Institute of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 1972, 6, 19-24.
References
Abramson, A. S., &Lisker, L. Discriminability along the voicing continuum: Cross-language tests. InProceedings of the 6th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Prague, 1967). Prague: Academia, 1970. Pp. 569–573.
DeLattre, P. C, Liberman, A. M., &Cooper, F. S. Acoustic loci and transitional cues for consonants.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1955,27, 769–773.
Eimas, P. D. Developmental aspects of speech perception. In R. Held, H. Leibowitz, & H. L. Teuber (Eds.),Handbook of sensory physiology. New York: Springer-Verlag, in press.
Fry, D. B., Abramson, A. S., Eimas, P. D., &Liberman, A. M. The identification and discrimination of synthetic vowels.Language and Speech, 1962,5, 171–189.
Fujimura, O. Syllable as a unit of speech recognition.IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1975,23, 82–87.
Goto, H. Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds “L” and “R.”Neuropsychologia, 1971,9, 317–323.
Heffner, R.-M. S.General phonetics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1952.
Jones, D.An outline of English phonetics. Cambridge Mass: Hefter, 1956.
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., &Studdert-Kennedy, M. Perception of the speech code.Psychological Review, 1967,74, 431–461.
Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S., &Griffith, B. C. The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1957,54, 358–368.
Mattingly, I. G., Liberman, A. M., Syrdal, A. K., &Halwes, T. Discrimination in speech and nonspeech modes.Cognitive Psychology, 1971,2, 131–157.
Miyawaki, K.A study of lingual articulation by use of dynamic palatography. Masters thesis, Department of Linguistics, University of Tokyo, March 1973.
O’Connor, J. D., Gerstman, L. J., Liberman, A. M., Delattre, P. C, &Cooper, F. S. Acoustic cues for the perception of initial /w, j, r, l/ in English.Word, 1957,13, 25–43.
Pisoni, D. B. Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,13, 253–260.
Pisoni, D. B. Auditory short-term memory and vowel perception.Memory & Cognition, 1975,3, 7–18.
Shankweiler, D. P., &Studdert-Kennedy, M. Identification of consonants and vowels presented to left and right ears.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967,19, 59–63.
Stevens, K. N., Liberman, A. M., Studdert-Kennedy, M., &Ohman, S. E. G. Cross-language study of vowel perception.Language and Speech, 1969,12, 1–23.
Vinegrad, M. D. A direct magnitude scaling method to investigate categorical versus continuous modes of speech perception.Language and Speech, 1972,15, 114–121.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by grants to the following: Haskins Laboratories, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-01994); the Center for Research in. Human Learning, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-01136) and the National Science Foundation (GB 35703X); and James J. Jenkins, National Institute of Mental Health (MH-21153). Dr. Liberman received support from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for his contribution to this research
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miyawaki, K., Jenkins, J.J., Strange, W. et al. An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of [r] and [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English. Perception & Psychophysics 18, 331–340 (1975). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211209
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211209