Abstract
It has been observed at least since the time of Aristotle that people cannot tickle themselves, but the reason remains elusive. Two sorts of explanations have been suggested. Theinterpersonal explanation suggests that tickling is fundamentally interpersonal and thus requires another person as the source of the touch. Thereflex explanation suggests that tickle simply requires an element of unpredictability or uncontrollability and is more like a reflex or some other stereotyped motor pattern. To test these explanations, we manipulated the perceived source of tickling. Thirty-five subjects were tickled twice-once by the experimenter, and once, they believed, by an automated machine. The reflex view predicts that our “tickle machine” should be as effective as a person in producing laughter, whereas the interpersonal view predicts significantly attenuated responses. Supporting the reflex view, subjects smiled, laughed, and wiggled just as often in response to the machine as to the experimenter. Self-reports of ticklishness were also virtually identical in the two conditions. Ticklish laughter evidently does not require that the stimulation be attributed to another person, as interpersonal accounts imply.
Article PDF
References
Bacon, F. (1677).Sylva sylvarum: or A natural history. London: S. G. & B. Griffin.
Barlow, G. W. (1996). Ethological units of behavior. In L. Houck & L. Drickamer (Eds.),Foundations of animal behavior: Classic papers with commentaries (pp. 138–153). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Black, D. W. (1984). Laughter.Journal of the American Medical Association,252, 2995–2998.
Bradley, M. M., Lang, P. J., &Cuthbert, B. N. (1993). Emotion, novelty, and the startle reflex: Habituation in humans.Behavioral Neuroscience,107, 970–980.
Claxton, G. (1975). Why can’t we tickle ourselves?Perceptual & Motor Skills,41, 335–338.
Cooper, L. (Trans.) (1922).An Aristotelian theory of comedy with an adaptation of the poetics and a translation of the Tractatus coislinianus. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Darwin, C. (1965).The expressions of the emotions in man and animals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1873)
DeSanto, V. R.,Newman, B., &Hemmes, N. S. (1997).The effects of perceived aversiveness on habituation to stimulus in human subjects. Poster presented at the 23rd annual meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Chicago.
Foot, H. C., &Chapman, A. J. (1976). The social responsiveness of young children in humorous situations. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.),Humour and laughter: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 187–214). London: Wiley.
Freedman, B. J. (1989). Now it tickles; now it doesn’t: Psychogenic variations in the perception of tactile stimuli.British Medical Journal,299, 250.
Fridlund, A. J., &Loftis, J. M. (1990). Relations between tickling and humorous laugher: Preliminary support for the Darwin-Hecker hypothesis.Biological Psychology,30, 141–150.
Hall, G. S., &Allin, A. (1897). The psychology of tickling, laughing, and the comic.American Journal of Psychology,9, 1–44.
Harris, C. R. (1999). The mystery of ticklish laughter.American Scientist,87, 344–351.
Harris, C. R., &Christenfeld, N. (1997). Humour, tickle, and the Darwin-Hecker hypothesis.Cognition & Emotion,11, 103–110.
Keith-Spiegel, P. (1972). Early conceptions of humor: Varieties and issues. In J. H. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee (Eds.),The psychology of humor (pp. 4–39). New York: Academic Press.
Koestler, A. (1964).The act of creation. London: Hutchinson.
Laughter. (1912).Edinburgh Review,215, 383–404.
Levine, J. (1979). Humor and psychopathology. In C. Izard (Ed.),Emotions in personality and psychopathology (pp. 37–69). New York: Plenum.
Leuba, C. (1941). Tickling and laughter: Two genetic studies.Journal of Genetic Psychology,58, 201–209.
McKimmin, P. J. (1989).Tickle sensation, pleasure, anxiety and the role of perceived control. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology, San Diego.
Newman, B., O’Grady, M. A., Ryan, C. S., &Hemmes, N. S. (1993). Pavlovian conditioning of the tickle response of human subjects: Temporal and delay conditioning.Perceptual & Motor Skills,77, 779–785.
Provine, R. R. (1993). Laughter punctuates speech: Linguistic, social, and gender contexts of laugher.Ethology,95, 291–298.
Provine, R. R. (1996). Laughter.American Scientist,84, 38–45.
Provine, R. R. (1997). Yawns, laughs, smiles, tickles, and talking: Naturalistic and laboratory studies of facial action and social communication. In J. A. Russell & J. M Fernandez-Dols (Eds.),The psychology of facial expression (pp. 158–175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shepherd, G. M. (1994).Neurobiology (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shultz, T. R. (1976). A cognitive-developmental analysis of humour. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.),Humour and laughter: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 12–36). London: Wiley.
Stearns, F. R. (1972).Laughing. Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.
Sully, J. (1902).An essay on laughter. New York: Longmans, Green.
Weiskrantz, L., Elliot, J., &Darlington, C. (1971). Preliminary observations on tickling oneself.Nature,230, 598–599.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
We gratefully acknowledge Meg Notman’s assistance with the creation of “Mechanical Meg” and her willingness to tickle the feet of strangers. We also thank Benjamin Liu for providing us with several references from antiquity.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harris, C.R., Christenfeld, N. Can a machine tickle?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 6, 504–510 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210841
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210841