Abstract
In three experiments, the effect of costs associated with responding on judgments of the causal effectiveness of the response was examined. In Experiment 1, the temporal interval between outcomes was matched on a variable interval (VI) and a variable ratio (VR) schedule. When each response was made at some “cost,” and outcomes represented some “gain” for the subject, the rating of causal effectiveness for responses was higher on the VR than on the VI schedule. This relationship was absent when the outcome was a triangle Hash. In Experiment 2, the number of responses required per outcome on a VI and a VR schedule were matched, and responses on the VR schedule were rated as more causally effective. In Experiment 3, a VI-to-VR yoking procedure was used. With minimal response costs, judgments were similar on the VI and VR schedules, but with greater response costs, responses performed on the VR schedule were rated as more causally effective than those emitted on the VI schedule.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, C D (1982). Variations in the sensitivity of instrumental responding to reinforcer devaluation.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,34B, 77–98
Alloy, L B, &Abkamsom, L Y (1979) Judgment of contingency in depressed and non-depressed students: Sadder but wiserJournal of Experimental Psychology. General.108.441–485
Blackman, D E. (1968). Response rate, reinforcement frequency, and conditioned suppression.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.11, 503–516
Chapman, G B. &Robbins, S J (1990) Cue interaction in human contingency judgmentMemory & Cognition.18, 537–545
Dickinson, A (1985) Actions and habits The development of behavioural autonomyPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B,308, 67–78
Dickinson, A (1989) Expectancy theory in animal conditioning In S. B Klein & R. R. Mowrer (Eds.).Contemporary learning theories Vol 1. Pavlovtan conditioning and the status of traditional learning theory (pp 279–308). Hillsdale. NJ Erlbaum
Dickinson, A. A Shanks, D R. (1985) Animal conditioning and human causality judgement In L.-G Nilsson & T. Archer (Eds.).Perspectives on learning and memory (pp 167–191) Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum
Ferster, C. B, &Skinner, B. F (1957).Schedules of reinforcement New York Appleton-Century-Crofts
Lea, S. E G. (1979). Foraging and reinforcement schedules in the pigeon Optimal and non-optimal aspects of choiceAnimal Behavior,27, 875–886
Morse, W H, &Kelleher, R T (1970) Schedules as fundamental determinants of behavior. In W. N Schoenfeld (Ed.).The theory of reinforcement schedules (pp 139–185) New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts
Nevis, J A (1979) Reinforcement schedules and response strength In M D Zeiler & P Harzem (Eds ).Advances in analysis of behaviour Vol I Reinforcement and the organization of behaviour (pp 117–158) Chichester, U.K. Willey
Peele, D B. Casey, J. &Silberberg, A (1984) Primacy of interresponse-time reinforcement in accounting for rates under variable-ratio and variable interval schedulesJournal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes10 149–167
Reed, P (1992) Effect of leca1 context of responding on human judgment of causalityMemory & Cognition20, 573–579
Reed, P (1993) Influence of schedule of outcome presentation on human judgments of causalityQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.46A 327–345 or]Reed P (1994) Causality ratings on variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules of reinforcement Manuscript submitted for publication
Reed, P. Schachtman, T R. &Hall G (1988) Overshadowing and potentiation of instrumental responding in rats as a function of the schedule of reinforcement.Learning & Motivation,19, 13–30
Robfrts, R E.Tarpy, R M. &Lea, S E G (1984) Stimulus response overshadowing Effect of signalled reward on instrumental responding as measured by response rate and resistance to changeJournal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes.10. 244–255
Shanks, D R &Dickinson, A (1987) Associative accounts of causally judgment In G H Bower (Ed),The psychology of teaming and motivation (Vol 21. pp 229–261) London Academic Press
Shanks D R Penrson S M &Dickinson, A (1989) Temporal continuity and the judgement of causality by human subjectsQuarrerly Journal of Experimental Psychology41B, 139–159
Wasserman, E A (1990) Detecting response-outcome relations Toward an understanding of the causal texture of the environment In G H Bower (Ed).The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 26 pp 27–82) London Academic Press
Wassfrman, E A, &Necnaber, D J (1986). College students responding to and rating of contingency relarions. The role of temporal contiguityJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.46, 15–35
Wenrden, J H. &Clark, R B (1988) Interresponse time reinforcement and behavior under aperiodic reinforcement schedules A case study using computer modelling.Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behaver Processes.14, 200–211
Zuriff G E (1970) A comparison of variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules of reinforcementJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,13, 269–374
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
-Accepted by previous editor Margaret Jean Intony-Peterson
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reed, P. Influence of the cost of responding. Memory & Cognition 22, 243–248 (1994). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208895
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208895