Abstract
Categorical perception refers to the ability to discriminate between- but not within-category differences along a stimulus continuum. Although categorical perception was thought to be unique to speech, recent studies have yielded similar results with nonspeech continua. The results are usually interpreted in terms of categorical, as opposed to continuous, perception of both speech and nonspeech continua. In contrast, we argue that these continua are perceived continuously, although they are characterized by relatively large increases in discrim-inability near the category boundary. To support this argument, the amplitude rise time of a tone was varied to produce either an increase or a decrease in the intensity during the initial portion of the tone. A bipolar continuum of onset times increasing and decreasing in amplitude yielded traditional categorical results. However, when only half of this continuum was tested, subjects perceived the same sounds continuously. The finding of traditional categorical results along the bipolar continuum, when the sounds were shown to be perceived continuously in another context, argues against the use of traditional categorical results as evidence for categorical perception.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference Notes
Fujisaki, H., & Kawashima, T.On the modes and mechanisms of speech perception (Annual Report of the Engineering Research Institute, Vol. 28). Tokyo: Faculty of Engineering, University of Tokyo, 1969.
Fujisaki, H., & Kawashima, T.Some experiments on speech perception and a model for the perceptual mechanism (Annual Report of the Engineering Research Institute, Vol. 29). Tokyo: Faculty of Engineering, University of Tokyo, 1970.
Vercoe, B.Music 11. Cambridge, Mass: The studio for Experimental Music, M.LT., 1976.
Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M.Categorical or continuous speech perception. Unpublished manuscript, 1981. (Available from Program in Experimental Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Calif., 95064.)
References
Carney, A. E., Widin, G. P., &Viemeister, N. F. Non-categorical perception of stop consonants differing in VOT.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1977,61, 961–970.
Cutting, J. E. Plucks and bows are categorically perceived, sometimes.Perception & Psychophysics, 1982,31, 462–476.
Cutting, J. E., &Rosner, B. S. Categories and boundaries in speech and music.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,16, 564–570.
Cutting, J. E., Rosner, B. S., &Foard, C. F. Perceptual categories for musiclike sounds: Implications for theories of speech perception.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1976,11, 361–378.
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. S., &Studdert-Kennedy, M. Perception of the speech code.Psychological Review, 1967,74, 431–461.
Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S., &Griffith, B. C. The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1957,54, 358–368.
Massaro, D. W.Experimental psychology and information processing. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1975. (a)
Massaro, D. W.Understanding language: An information processing analysis of speech perception, reading, and psycholinguistics. New York: Academic Press, 1975. (b)
Massaro, D. W. Auditory information processing. In W. K. Estes (Ed.),Handbook of learning and cognitive processes: Attention and memory(Vol. 4). Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1976.
Massaro, D. W., &Oden, G. C. Speech perception and framework for research and theory. In N. J. Lass (Ed.),Speech and language: Advances in basic research and practice (Vol. 3). New York: Academic Press, 1980.
Miller, J. D., Wier, C. C., Pastore, R. E., Kelly, W. J., &Dooling, R. J. Discrimination and labeling of noise-buzz sequences with varying noise-lead times: An example of categorical perception.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1976,60, 410–416.
Paap, K. Theories of speech perception. In D. W. Massaro (Ed.),Understanding language:An information processing analysis of speech perception. reading and psycholingulstics. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
Pastore, R. E., Ahroon, W. A., Baffuto, K. J., Friedman, C., Puleo, J. S., &Fink, E. A. Common-factor model of categorical perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977,3, 686–696.
Pisoni, D. B. Auditory and phonetic codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,13, 253–260.
Pisoni, D. B. Auditory identification and discrimination of the relative onset time of two component tones: Implications for voicing perception in stops.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1977,61, 1352–1361.
Pisoni, D. B., &Lazarus, J. H. Categorical and noncategorical modes of speech perception along the voicing continuum.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1974,55, 323–334.
Rosen, S. M., &Howell, P. Plucks and bows are not categorically perceived.Perception & Psychophysics, 1981,30, 156–168.
Samuel, A. G. The effect of discrimination training on speech perception: Noncategorical perception.Perception & Psychophysics, 1977,11, 321–330.
Studdert-Kennedy, M., Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., &Cooper, F. S. Motor theory of speech perception: A reply to Lane’s critical review.Psychological Review, 1970,77, 234–249.
VanHeuven, V. J. J. P., &Van DenBroecke, M. P. R. Auditory discrimination of rise and decay times in tone and noise bursts.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1979,66, 1308–1315.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The preparation of this paper was supported in part by NIMH Grant MH-35334.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hary, J.M., Massaro, D.W. Categorical results do not imply categorical perception. Perception & Psychophysics 32, 409–418 (1982). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202770
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202770