Abstract
This article details three difficulties encountered during the prewriting and drafting stages of document preparation and describes computer aids designed for each difficulty. Writers experience problems in planning ideas and translating ideas into text because of attentional overload, inability to generate useful ideas, and affective interference. Idea processors are programs that perform various functions to assist with generating and organizing ideas so they can be communicated successfully in a written document. Among other things, an idea processor can serve as a funnel for attention, an inventor of ideas, or therapist for emotional hindrance. The article reviews existing programs that function as funnels, inventors, and therapists and concludes with a discussion of the potential efficacy of such programs in solving the major problems associated with planning and translating.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atlas, M. (1979, December).Addressing an audience: A study of expert-novice differences in writing. (Report No. 3). New York: American Institutes for Research.
Beaugrande, R. de (1984).Text production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Boice, R. (1982). Increasing the writing productivity of “blocked” academicians.Behavior Research & Therapy,20, 197–207.
Boice, R. (1983). Clinical and experimental treatments of writing block.Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology,51, 183–191.
Boice, R. (1985). Cognitive components of blocking.Written Communication,2, 91–104.
Boice, R., &Johnson, K. (1984). Perception and practice of writing for publication by faculty at a doctoral-granting university.Research in Higher Education,21, 33–43.
Bonner, P. (1984, March). Make a new plan, Stan.Personal Software, pp. 120–123
Bridwell, L.,Johnson, P., &Brehe, S. (in press). Composing and computers: Case studies of experienced writers. In A. Matsuhashi (Ed.),Writing in real time. Modelling production processes. London: Longman.
Britton, B. K., Glynn, S. M., Meyer, B. J. F., &Penland, M. J. (1982). Effects of text structure on use of cognitive capacity during reading.Journal of Educational Psychology,74, 51–61.
Britton, B. K., &Tesser, A. (1982). Effects of prior knowledge on use of cognitive capacity in three complex cognitive tasks.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,21, 421–436.
Burns, H. (1979). Stimulating rhetorical invention in English composition through computer-assisted instruction.Dissertation Abstracts International,40, 3734A. (University Microfilms No. 79-28268)
Burns, H. (1984). Recollections of first-generation computer-assisted prewriting. In W. Wresch (Ed.),The computer in composition instruction. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Burns, H. L., &Culp, G. H. (1980, August). Stimulating invention in English composition through computer-assisted instruction.Educational Technology, pp. 5–10.
Charney, D. (1984, February). The validity of using holistic scoring to evaluate writing: A critical overview.Research in the Teaching of English, pp. 65–81.
Corbett, E. P. J. (1965).Classical rhetoric for the modern student. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cowley, M. (Ed.). (1958).Writers at work: The Paris Review interviews (Vol. 1). New York: Viking.
Daiy, J. A. (1978). Writing apprehension and writing competence.The Journal of Educational Research,2, 10–14.
Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving (L. S. Lees, Trans).Psychological Monographs,58(Whole No. 270).
Elbow, P. (1981).Writing with power. New York: Oxford University Press.
Flower, L. S (1981).Problem-solving strategies for writing. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Flower, L. S., &Hayes, J. R. (1977). Problem-solving strategies and the writing process.College English,39, 449–461.
Flower, L. S., &Hayes, J. R. (1980a). The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem.College Composition & Communication,2, 21–32.
Flower, L. S., &Hayes, J. R. (1980b). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.),Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Freedman, S. W. (1983). Student characteristics and essay test writing performance.Research in the Teaching of College English,17, 313–325.
Garfield, E. (1983, April 4). Introducing SCI-MATE-a menu-driven microcomputer software package for online and offline information retrieval.Current Contents, pp. 5–15.
Glaser, R. (1984). Education and thinking: The role of knowledge.American Psychologist,39, 93–104.
Glynn, S. M., Britton, B. K., Muth, D., &Dogan, N. (1982). Writing and reviewing persuasive documents: Cognitive demands.Journal of Educational Psychology,74, 557–567.
Gordon, W. J. J. (1961).Synectics. New York: Harper & Row.
Gould, J. D. (1980). Experiments on composing letters: Some facts, some myths, and some observations. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.),Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 97–127).
Graesser, A. C., Hopkinson, P. L., Lewis, E. W., &Bruflodt, H. A. (1984). The impact of different information sources on idea generation: Writing off the top of our heads.Written Communication,1, 341–364.
Green, D. W, &Wason, P. C. (1982). Notes on the psychology of writing.Human Relations,35, 47–56.
Guilford, J. P. (1967).The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hayes, J. R. (1981).The complete problem solver. Philadelphia: Franklin Press.
Hershey, W. R. (1984, May). Thinktank: An outlining and organizing tool.Byte, pp. 189–194.
Hirsch, E. D., Jr., &Harrington, D. P. (1981). Measuring the communicative effectiveness of prose. In C. H. Frederiksen & J. F. Dominic (Eds.),Writing: Process, development, and communication (Vol. 2, pp. 189–208). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kellogg, R. T. (1983) [Cognitive effort in intentional and incidental learning]. Unpublished raw data.
Kellogg, R. T. (1984, November).Cognitive strategies in writing. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Antonio, TX.
Kellogg, R. T. (1985). Computer aids that writers need.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,17, 253–258.
Kellogg, R. T. (1986).Effects of topic knowledge on the allocation of time and effort to writing processes. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Klare, G. R. (1976). A second look at the validity of readability formulas.Journal of Reading Behavior,8, 129–152.
Kubie, L. S. (1958).Neurotic distortion of the creative process. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
Landauer, T. K. (1985). Psychological research as the mother of invention. In L. Borman & B. Curtis (Eds.),Proceedings of CHI ’85, Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–10). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Lauer, J. M. (1967). Invention in contemporary rhetoric: Heuristic procedures.Dissertation Abstracts International,28, 5060A. (University Microfilms No. 68-7656)
Layman, D. (1984, August 7). Framework: An outline for thought.PC Magazine, pp. 119–127.
Lowenthal, D , &Wason, P. C. (1977, June 24). Academics and their writing.London Times Literary Supplement, p. 282.
Luchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving.Psychological Monographs,54(Whole No. 248).
Macdonald, N. H. (1983). The UNIX Writer’s Workbench software: Rationale and design.Bell System Technical Journal,62, 1891–1908.
Neumann, D. (1986). A psychotherapeutic computer application: Modification of technological competence.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,18, 135–140.
Neuwirth, C.M. (1984). Toward the design of a flexible, computer-based writing environment. In W. Wresch (Ed.),The computer in composition instruction. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Nold, E. W. (1981) Revising. InC. H. Frederiksen and J. F Dominic (Eds.),Writing: Process, development, and communication (Vol 2, pp. 67–80). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Owens, P. (1984, April). Thinktank and Promptdoc.Popular Computing, pp. 186–189.
Rodrigues, D., &Rodrigues, R. J. (1984). Computer-based creative problem solving. In W. Wresch (Ed.),The computer in composition instruction, Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English
Rose, M. (1980). Rigid rules, inflexible plans, and the stifling of language: A cognitivist’s analysis of writer’s blockCollege Composition & Communication,31, 389–401.
Rose, M. (1984).Writer’s block: The cognitive dimension Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Rosenberg, H., &Lah, M I. (1982). A comprehensive behavioral-cognitive treatment of writer’s block.Behavioral Psychotherapy,10, 356–363.
Rueckert, W. H. (1963)Kenneth Burke and the drama of human relations. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Selmi, P. M., Klein, M. H., Greist, J. H., Johnson, J H., &Harris, W. G. (1982). An investigation of computer-assisted cognitive-behavior therapy in the treatment of depression.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,14, 181–185.
Seymour, J. (1984, September). Data bases: Managers go on-line.Today’s Office, pp. 36–40.
Smith, R. N. (1982). Computerized aids to writing. In W. Frawley (Ed.),Linguistics and literacy (pp. 189–208). New York: Plenum
Stein, M. I (1974).Stimulating creativity: Vol. 1 Individual procedures. New York: Academic Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). All’s well that ends well, but it’s a sad tale that begins at the end: A reply to Glaser.American Psychologist,40, 571–572.
Taylor, C. W., &Barron, F (Eds). (1963).Scientific creativity. Its recognition and development. New York: Wiley
Uhlig, R. P, Farber, D. J., &Bair, J. H (1979)The office of the future Holland: Elsevier North-Holland
Von Blum, R., &Cohen, M E. (1984). WANDAH. Writing aid and author’s helper. In W Wresch (Ed),The computer in composition instruction. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English
Walker, L (1984, April). How to polish up your word processing.Personal Software, pp. 108–115, 156–157.
Winterowd, W R. (1968).Rhetoric: A synthesis. New York Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Wresch, W (1984). Questions, answers, and automated writing In W Wresch (Ed.),The computer in composition instruction. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English
Young, R. E., Becker, A L., &Pike, K. L. (1970). Rhetoric Discovery and change. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Zinsser, W. (1983).Writing with a word processor. New York: Harper & Row.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kellogg, R.T. Designing idea processors for document composition. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 18, 118–128 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201010
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201010