Abstract
In this report, we examine tachistoscopic perception of lines in structured figures. Previous research has shown that perception of lines is facilitated when the lines occur as parts of coherent three-dimensional figures. Experiment 1 demonstrates that it is not necessary for the figure to be three-dimensional to obtain facilitation. Experiments 2 and 3 show that three-dimensionality is not sufficient either. What is important is that the target lines be structurally relevant to the figure. However, structural relevance of a target segment to the figure as perceived with unlimited viewing time is not perfectly correlated with perceptibility under tachistoscopic conditions; it appears that the targets which fall on the external contour of a figure may be facilitated even without a high degree of structural relevance. In view of this, we suggest a model in which perceivers use processing heuristics to direct processing to aspects of the input that are potentially important for determining the structure of the final figure, working primarily from the outside in.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banks.W. P., &Prinzmetal, W. Configurational effects in visual information processing.Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,19, 361–367.
Bell, H. H., &Handel, S. The role of pattern goodness in the reproduction of backward masked patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976,2, 139–150.
Biederman, I. Perceiving real world scenes.Science, 1972,177, 77–80.
Breitmeyer, B. G., &Ganz, L. Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing.Psychological Review, 1976,83, 1–36.
Eriksen, C. W., &Rohrbaugh, J. Visual masking in multielement displays.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,83, 147–154.
Estes, W. K., Allmeyer, D. H., &Reder, S. M. Serial position functions of letter identification at brief and extended exposure durations.Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,19, 1–15.
Johnston, J. C., &McClelland, J. L. Perception of letters in words: Seek not and ye shall find.Science, 1974,184, 1192–1194.
Keppel, G.Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook. Englcwood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
McClelland, J. L. Perception and masking of wholes and parts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1978,4, 210–223.
Navon, D. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception.Cognitive Psychology, 1977,9, 353–383.
Neisser, U.Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.
Pomerantz, J. Pattern goodness and speed of encoding.Memory & Cognition, 1977,5, 235–241.
Pomerantz, J., Sager, L., &Stoever, R. Perception of wholes and their component parts: Some configurational superiority effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977,3, 422–435.
Prinzmetal.W., &Banks, W. P. Good continuation affects visual detection.Perception & Psychophysics, 1977,21, 389–395.
Waltz.D. Understanding line drawings of scenes with shadows. In P. Winston (Ed.),The psychology of computer vision. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.
Weisstein, N., &Harris, C. S. Visual detection of line segments: An object superiority effect.Science, 1974,186, 752–755.
Weisstein, N., &McGuire, W. Computing the next step: Psychophysical measures of representation and interpretation. In E. Riseman & A. Hanson (Eds.),Computer vision systems, New York: Academie Press, 1978.
Williams, A., &Weisstein, N. Line segments are perceived better in a coherent context than alone: An object-line effect.Memory & Cognition, 1978,6, 85–90.
Wolford, G. Perturbation model for letter identification.Psychological Review, 1975,82, 184–199.
Womersley, M. A contextual effect in feature detection with application of signal detection methodology.Perception & Psychophysics, 1977,21, 88–92.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by NSF Grant BNS76-14830 to the first author and by Grant PHS NH 15828 to the Center for Human Information Processing, University of California, San Diego.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McClelland, J.L., Miller, J. Structural factors in figure perception. Perception & Psychophysics 26, 221–229 (1979). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199872
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199872