Abstract
The ability of prelingually, profoundly deaf readers to access phonological information during reading was investigated in three experiments. The experiments employed a task, developed by Meyer, Schvaneveldt, and Ruddy (1974), in which lexical decision response times (RTs) to orthographically similar rhyming (e.g., WAVE-SAVE) and nortrhyming (e.g., HAVE-CAVE) word pairs were compared with RTs to orthographically and phonologically dissimilar control word pairs. The subjects of the study were deaf college students and hearing college students. In Experiments 1 and 2, in which the nonwords were pronounceable, the deaf subjects, like the hearing subjects, were facilitated in their RTs to rhyming pairs, but not to nonrhyming pairs. In Experiment 3, in which the nonwords were unpronounceable, both deaf and hearing subjects were facilitated in their RTs to both rhyming and nonrhyming pairs, with the facilitation being significantly greater for the rhyming pairs. These results indicate that access to phonological information is possible despite prelingual and profound hearing impairment. As such, they run counter to claims that deaf individuals are limited to the use of visual strategies in reading. Given the impoverished auditory, experience of such readers, these results suggest that the use of phonological information need not be tied to the auditory modality.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blanton, R. L., Nunnally, J. C., &Odom, P. B. (1967). Graphemic, phonetic, and associative factors in the verbal behavior of deaf and hearing subjects.Journal of Speech & Hearing Research,10, 225–231.
Chomsky, N., &Halle, M. (1968).The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
Conrad, R. (1979).The deaf school child. London: Harper & Row.
Crowder, R. G. (1982).The psychology of reading: An introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Evett, L. J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1981). The use of abstract graphemic information in lexical access.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 325–350.
Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests. (1969). New York: Columbia Teachers’ College Press.
Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests (2nd ed.) (1978). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gleitman, L. R., &Rozin, P. (1977). The structure and acquisition of reading: I. Relations between orthographies and the structure of language. In A. S. Reber & D. L. Scarborough (Eds.),Toward a psychology of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Hanson, V. L. (1982). Short-term recall by deaf signers of American Sign Language: Implications for order recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, &Cognition.8, 572–583
Hanson, V. L., Liberman, I. Y., &Shankweiler, D. (1984). Linguistic coding by deaf children in relation to beginning reading success.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,37, 378–393.
Lichtsnstein, E. H. (in press). The relationships between reading processes and English skills of deaf college students: Part If.Applied Psycholinguistics.
Linell, P. (1979).Psychological reality in phonology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., &Ruddy, M. G. (1974). Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word-recognition.Memory & Cognition,2, 309–321.
Schulman, H. G., Hornak, R., &Sanders, E. (1978). The effects of graphemic, phonetic, and semantic relationships on access to lexical structures.Memory & Cognition,6, 115–123.
Steinberg, D. (1973). Phonology, reading and Chomsky’s optimal orthography.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,2, 239–258.
Wike, E. L., &Church, J. D. (1976). Comments on Clark’s “The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy”.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 249–255.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant NS-18010 from the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and by Grant HD4)1994 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hanson, V.L., Fowler, C.A. Phonological coding in word reading: Evidence from hearing and deaf readers. Memory & Cognition 15, 199–207 (1987). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197717
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197717